Warning: Wikileaks May Have Just Been Hacked By NSA

AND just after we were signed OVER ....HMMMM

originally posted by: Noncents
I haven't been able to get the Norse map to actually load. Has anybody had luck with that?

It's gone and twitter.
Wikileaks and CNN and reuters still available.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Well Duhhhh !!!!!

Of COURSE ATS is a honeypot!

As a former member (kinda, sorta, maybe past and present)
of the intelligence community, can tell you that the NSA,
DIA, and a few other 3, 4 and 5 letter agencies around the
world have targeted websites such as ATS, RENSE,
ZERO HEDGE, HOTMAIL, OUTLOOK, GMAIL, etc,
for YEARS (if not decades now!).

Since SSL2 was broken a few years back, man-in-the-middle
servers have been put on almost all major telcos, Cable-Co's,
and Edge Servers so that basic metadata (and sometimes
full interception) can be gathered and datamined for
connections, associations, and technical data.

In the USA, for the most part, only a general sweep
of emails that look for the specified "FIVE EYES"
dictionary terms are run through on an automated
basis. When found terms trigger a secondary examination
by rather advanced datamining software, the systems do
a more specific associative dig into the data before it
EVER gets flagged for a look by a human SIGINT/HUMINT analyst.

Only SPECIFICALLY TARGETED individuals get a long-term,
continuous datamining software assignment on ALL their
communications. If foreign, the person simply gets monitored
from the get go. If US born or a citizen and resident in-country,
GENERALLY a court order is obtained (although I have seen that
NOT happen a few times!) before a SIGINT/HUMINT person/team
is assigned.

And those targets are assigned threat levels that take into account
personality traits (is he/she violent or passive?), connections to other
persons (do they have relatives in Syria or Yemen), types of activities
(are they an ATS blogger or Patriot Website operator?) or their education
and expertise level (i.e. are they a chemist, bioligist or nuclear tech or ex-military?).

Only after about 10-15 steps is ANY targeted individual scanned
on a continuous basis and since the current ACTIVE Person-of-Interest
database is about 600,000 persons in size even that gets whittled
down to less than 20,000 and then about 2500 to 10,000 depending
upon year, that get personal teams of SIGINT/HUMINT operators to
take a closer more personal look!

The CIA and NSA don't like to share their almost IDENTICIAL SearchBook
databases (user interfaces are nearly identical to Facebook but designed
for Persons of Interest!). And the turf wars EVEN IN 2016 are RIDICULOUS !!!!
I just goto the DIA one...it's much easier to deal with a self-discliplined
Major or Captain! No BS from any idiot cement-condo-sucking urbanite
barely-post-millennial managers!

So don't flatter yourselves, thinking you're being scanned by the NSA!
A machine does that mostly for time, date, location, to/from data
and any subject matter keywords metadata and only a FEW lucky
ones get any real-world human attention!

The blackouts you saw today LIKELY started from Virginia and New Jersey
and went on from there! Possibly internal-to-USA agency started this
because of Wikileaks but you can't TOTALLY discount Russia, North Korea,
China and Eastern European Criminal Organization IN THAT ORDER being
the cause...my bet is this is an exercise by NSA to test disruption software
BEFORE giving it a full Cyberwarfare Whack at Russia by Early-to-Mid December!

TOUCHE !!!!!

P.S. Fer Da Spooks: Don't Mess With Me!
My Friends Can Send Your Planet into the Sun!
Don't Tick Them Off !!!!

originally posted by: nikkib0421

I saw somewhere Department of Homeland Security is looking into it.

The perfect distraction scenario unfolding just as planned. You won't know what's happened until they tell you.

a reply to: IAMTAT

From WikiLeaks just now about DDoS:

Tweet

Edited to Add: This group is after Russia and state today's attack was a test of power. I can't believe they are friends of WikiLeaks if true. News reports say over a million computers or devices were used to power the attack via malware.

I have reason to suspect my PC was used in this attack if I'm correctly assessing the situation. I have a malware file I've been unable to get rid of even after aggressive Norton scans. I just did another one. Where did I get it? When I downloaded a tool to open a WikiLeaks file weeks ago which was on the same page as the WikiLeaks download link. Other people complained the download tool had malware.

a reply to: tweetie

So wikileaks thinks Assange supporters are causing these attacks and have asked them to stop. The Cyber wars have started it seems.

a reply to: IAMTAT

I don't know...

This crew is taking responsibility:

New World Hackers

Edit: I put my edit in the wrong post above. It should go here!

Edited to Add: This group is after Russia and state today's attack was a test of power. I can't believe they are friends of WikiLeaks if true. News reports say over a million computers or devices were used to power the attack via malware.

I have reason to suspect my PC was used in this attack if I'm correctly assessing the situation. I have a malware file I've been unable to get rid of even after aggressive Norton scans. I just did another one. Where did I get it? When I downloaded a tool to open a WikiLeaks file weeks ago which was on the same page as the WikiLeaks download link. Other people complained the download tool had malware.

The Obama administration should not have attempted to misuse its instruments of state to stop criticism of its ruling party candidate.

twitter.com...

Obama -> Kerry -> Ecuador -> Assange detained?
seems like it. they claim he's alive. that doesn't have to mean he's alive and well.

a reply to: jedi_hamster

On another thread I posted my doubts that the WikiLeaks tweet actually came from WikiLeaks. It seems like something the USA's NSA would plant in order to make a case against WikiLeaks. In the cyberspace context, it could be used as a false flag to justify... things I do not wish to contemplate.

a reply to: Kapriti

so you think they would blame wikileaks instead of Russia?
right after Hillary pulled 17 agencies out of her ass?

nah. doubt it.

Heard Podesta was in London today. Kerry was just there, wikileaks tweets going round the twist.

There's some deep state ish going on right now, pieces are moving that have been kept in reserve.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

that's curious, if not dangerous. got any link?

a reply to: jedi_hamster

Looking, can't post in the forum i saw the message in. Trying a workaround. Gimme a few.

a reply to: jedi_hamster

Looking, can't post ib the forum i saw the message in. Trying a workaround. Gimme a few.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
Heard Podesta was in London today. Kerry was just there, wikileaks tweets going round the twist.

There's some deep state ish going on right now, pieces are moving that have been kept in reserve.

Saw the photo of Podesta meeting Khan in London via Twitter.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Thank youn Kzhir Khan? As in worked at Hogan Lovell?

Also, interdasting 4chan post, the pertinent bit:

I downloaded all of wikileak's tweets into a database and have been running some stylometric analysis on the data. What I have found is deeply upsetting.

There is a detectable change in writing style in the tweets beginning after a particular October 16 tweet. Compared to old wikileaks, "new" wikileaks:

>makes significantly more spelling/grammatical errors than old wikileaks (ex. "pricipally" instead of "principally")
>uses significantly more hashtags and writes shorter messages than old wikileaks
>has noticeably different formatting (ex. spaces between certain tokens that weren't there before, periods missing from sentences, etc.)
>has a less rich vocabulary (using a random sample of 20 tweets from each group, "new" wikileaks used 36% less unique words)
>uses a narrative writing style as opposed to old wikileak's expository writing style (i.e. told in a story format rather than a facts-and-figures format)

...

Here's where the real plan kicks in: in the coming weeks, "new" wikileaks will release several batches of fabricated emails. It will not be immediately obvious that these documents were fabricated, but the liberal media will soon find out. When they do, they will relentlessly broadcast their discovery across the nation. This will destroy the credibility of wikileaks and allow the undecideds to wave off any damaging evidence against Clinton as mere "conspiracy theories."

You have been warned.

Hm



But then other anons come in and counter. One says theres a payload in the .pdf OP links and that they're the shill.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

one way or another, i don't like it one bit.

the whole ddos attack smells false flag to the high heaven. that would be used to blame Russia though, and i've got a feeling wikileaks is somehow connected to it all. the question is, how.

another thing crossed my mind. if wikileaks wasn't hacked/taken over, perhaps they're throwing anonymous under the bus because they know the whole ddos is a false flag to blame Russia. "quick, anonymous, take the credit before it's too late".

a certain irony, a company that's made its name via illegally hacked means cries loudly when itself is hacked.

lol

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Sadiq Khan. London's Mayor.