It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Another Woman Comes Forward About Trump Assaulting Her

page: 2
76
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 04:44 PM
link   
Everyone on the Forum is here because someone had enough balls to grab their mother in the P---y. Why is everyone who has a mother or father shocked by this behavior?? I'm sure there have been times when your mom told your dad not tonight and he probably pushed the envelope....should e now charge all parents or people who have had sex with a crime...

Now if Mr. Trump had held them down and forced himself on them I would call rape....But every person man or woman has dealt with a handsy person in the bar or in public....Imagine if everyone called the cops every time a guy or girl grabs someones butt in a bar......

RIDICOLOUS!!! These women have passed the statue of limitations and if they felt so strongly about it then they should have come forward...I'm sure everyone would have given them their day in court and both the accusers and the accused would have ad an opportunity to give their story.....Problem is there was never any story or crime to report....This is slander in an effort to sway an election plain and simple.




posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 04:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: kruphix

So this is why Bruce Jenner became a woman!


Dignity is forsaken.




posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 04:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: kruphix

So what? She is probably like the other CRT people on the interwebs...do anything for a payday.

And the whole wiping away the tears thing? Really?



There it is - the two fallbacks of the Trump campaign and their CTR minions.

1. Deflect to Hillary.
2. Attack the source or the person(s) in the source
3. Call those who have an opposing viewpoint a "shill" by suggesting their a CTR operative

The baseless and paranoid conspiracies (and I'm all for a good conspiracy) that the Trump campaign has to come up with shows the desperation, it's truly palpable.

Trump's entire presidency basically centers around "he's not Hillary or Bill Clinton," and because of this his supporters believe him to be incapable of any sort of wrongdoing.

It's interesting to say the least.

Oh, and number four is to tell anyone who has an opposing viewpoint to Trump that they're secretly a Hillary lover and supporter. Which by the way, I certainly am not.

I detest authoritarians and do not discriminate. Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton have more in common with one another than they do with us "we the people."



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 04:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: GodEmperor


Lame.


That about sums it up.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 04:47 PM
link   
a reply to: kruphix





She said she first encountered Donald Trump in 1998


why come forward now ?
why not a year ago ?
why come out now just at a pivotal point in the election ?
what held her back for so long ?

questions asked by detectives
who are worth their salt



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 04:48 PM
link   
a reply to: GuidedKill

Slander?

Logical consistency and all, what would the correct term be then regarding people suggesting Hillary is dead, employs body doubles and/or clones, has severe medical illnesses, can't walk up a flight of stairs, coughs up Reptilian eggs, etc etc?

I absolutely detest Hillary Clinton because of her POLICIES and IDEALS - it has nothing to do with anything else. Most people however are more considered with assassinating her character.

It's funny - Trump supporters slander Clinton all the time but can't take any criticism themselves. Bunch of insecure bunch imo.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 04:48 PM
link   
a reply to: kruphix




Can you prove any of these women have any connection at all to the DNC or the Clinton campaign?


Can you prove any of these women's conveniently timed stories?

They're both speculation but Ockham's razor says their lying. If these women came forward at any other time than during an election(especially the last month) I'd be more inclined to believe them over Trump.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 04:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: jtma508
All I can add is God help these women if Donald actually gets elected. I mean God help us all but as far as they are concerned, can you imagine what will become of their lives when The Donald wields the power of his office like his personal blunt object?



They will all be Killed Of Course .......Not .



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 04:50 PM
link   
a reply to: RomeByFire

I didn't say those weren't examples of slander as well....However the OP wasn't about Hillary so please stay on topic....Thanks.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 04:50 PM
link   
a reply to: RomeByFire

Just go to 2:20 and tell me this is not an actress and this is not an agenda.



Seriously? WTF is up with you people?




posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 04:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: RomeByFire

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: kruphix




How many more women have to come forward to share their stories before Trump and his supporters start to take this issue seriously?


The more women the DNC and Clinton camp scrape up with these bogus claims just continues to make them even easier to discredit.

Trump's run for presidency hangs from the female vote. Clinton knows this and we'll see more and more women 'coming forward' through the election.




See, if I were to say something like "the more wild and baseless conspiracies that pop up around Hillary Clinton regurgitated by the alt-right the easier it is to discredit them and cast my vote for Hillary because it shows the level of intellect of the other respective camp," people would lose their minds lol.



Posted by ME: (it seems there are too many quotes in what I am quoting to make it format right).

I like that. If you aren't going to use it, I will.


The more wild and baseless conspiracies that pop up around Hillary Clinton regurgitated by the alt-right, the easier it is to discredit them and cast my vote for Hillary because it shows the level of intellect of the other respective camp.



edit on 20-10-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)

edit on 20-10-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 04:51 PM
link   
a reply to: kruphix

You act as though these claims have been fully investigated by the FBI and confirmed. And the amount of evidence itself is just to great to dismiss even without vetting.

Man lets talk about the administration calling for Ecuador to silence free speech and crying about outside someone or another tied up in american elections.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 04:51 PM
link   
If the op truly believes these women then why post in the mud pit?



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 04:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: thesaneone
If the op truly believes these women then why post in the mud pit?


Because even he knows this story, like the other unfounded allegations stinks to high hell..


If it looks like S--t and if it smells like S--t.....It's probably S--t.

At least that's that was I was taught...But who am I except a College educated man with a whole lot of common sense....
edit on 20-10-2016 by GuidedKill because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 04:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: thesaneone
If the op truly believes these women then why post in the mud pit?


I think the OP knew the deplorable responses that would ensue.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 04:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: thesaneone
If the op truly believes these women then why post in the mud pit?


I think the OP knew the deplorable responses that would ensue.


Which is what?
There is no proof other then she said.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 04:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: RomeByFire

Just go to 2:20 and tell me this is not an actress and this is not an agenda.



Seriously? WTF is up with you people?



You people?

Well you hit the fourth Trump tactic - assume and suggest I'm a Clinton supporter lol.

Wtf is up with you people? I'm not one to watch YouTube clips as a verifiable source, sorry man haha, but believe me when I say I'm not bought on the supposed actions that transpired between Trump and these women?

Where did I once say they were being truthful? Please quote me on that - I'll patiently wait, because I'm certain I didn't and you instead insisted that I did only to tear it down yourself. That's a fallacy lol.

Like I said - anything/anyone that doesn't follow the narrative of "Trump is holy, Hillary is evil," is automatically assumed to either be a Hillary shill or a supporter of Hillary.

i can't stand Hillary Clinton, but I'm not deluded and have a somewhat decent memory.

A few months back ATS'ers were linking CNN polls showing that "Trump is winning," and now that the polls show he is down they refer to CNN as "Clinton News Network." I don't have cable and haven't had cable for a few years now, so I don't watch television - but one thing is certain, Trump supporters have been desperately clutching at any straw they can find to discredit Hillary and bolster Trump and that's telling to me.

Ffs - there was an ongoing 4chan thread with Trump supporters (using their dumbass Pepe memes) who were hacking online polls to make it look like Trump was winning. I mean, honestly?

You and your people are going to whine and complain about a rigged election, then proceed to attempt to rig online polls to secure an election - and I'm (who does not support either candidate) supposed to see that as different, somehow?

Lol. Yeah, Trump and his cult and their attempts at doing exactly what they claim that Hillary and the MSM is what I call "hipocritical," and I'm not one to support one who has to cheat to win.

That goes for both political candidates. I don't support either of them. Not to sure why every Trump supporter on ATS insists that anyone who isn't a Trump supporter is a Hillary supporter.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 05:05 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

It's the equivalent of what Trump supporters say so I don't see why they would be upset about it.

We all remember the 6 billion moar votes for Trump (in a nation that has 310~ million) in every anti-Trump thread, well, logical consistency and all.

For every anti-Hillary thread she gains 18493 moar mizillion votes because I say so, it's # annoying and stupid.

This election cycle has destroyed what ATS used to be. The Democrat/Republican partisan-paradigm is back into gear. The American people began to wake up and the two current life-long familial and oligarchal pals have ensured that the division reigns supreme over partisan politics than unity.

And people absolutely love it. The American people are watching the "Twitter and meme battles," with one hand on their cell phone to post their commentary and another hand in the bucket of popcorn because it's "entertaining."

Those of us who have been saying for years that the partisan-paradigm is the biggest danger to our freedoms and livelihood have to sit and watch this nation and our ignorant populace sling baseless insults and perpetuate ridiculous conspiracies about "the other camp," all the while we watch as our nation divided even further while TPTB continually grow even more powerful.

The American people deserve one of these asshats. We deserve the authoritarian dictatorship we have been so slowly drifting towards for decades. The American people have spoken - it's what they want.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 05:06 PM
link   
a reply to: RomeByFire

Cute, a Hillary supporter.

I think it's trying to communicate.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 05:09 PM
link   
a reply to: RomeByFire


You people?
Well you hit the fourth Trump tactic - assume and suggest I'm a Clinton supporter lol.
Wtf is up with you people?
I'm not one to watch YouTube clips as a verifiable source, sorry man haha, but believe me when I say I'm not bought on the supposed actions that transpired between Trump and these women?
Where did I once say they were being truthful? Please quote me on that - I'll patiently wait, because I'm certain I didn't and you instead insisted that I did only to tear it down yourself. That's a fallacy lol.


Mea Culpa. In my defence, you are a confessed socialist though, right?


You and your people are going to whine and complain about a rigged election, then proceed to attempt to rig online polls to secure an election - and I'm (who does not support either candidate) supposed to see that as different, somehow?


I am from England: Hello pot, I am the kettle.





top topics



 
76
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join