posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 02:51 PM
So I was reading through another email on her hearing and found this:
So Feinstein is feeding HRC intelligence that the ICIG is still concerned about the thumb drive and server? Is this legal for her to do?
Then it is asked for after that conversation and her attorney hands it over roughly 10 days later by HRC attorney.
My radar is pinging as to why the ICIG had concerns that there was more top secret info on the thumb drive and the server. That suggests to me that
more is known about it than let on. Feinstein seems to be in on the cover up from the email exchange here. It shows to me that there was doubt from
the top that HRC gave over everything she had.
Why is Feinstein giving them a heads up on this and is it legal for her to do so after a conversation with the ICIG?
Just odd....no idea if illegal or not, but regardless she gave them the heads up it was being questioned by a top authority.