It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MaximRecoil
By looking at some more of the Romanian sites (with semi-coherent translating by Google), I found various claims of the alloy composition. In one case there were multiple alloy compositions listed on the same site, along the names of the labs that did the tests:
The National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Department archaeometallurgy. The results were the following: aluminum - 80.5%, tin - 6.5%, copper - 6%, silicon - 4%, zinc - 2%, lead - 0.5% Antimony - 0.5%, in addition they were highlighted traces of silver, nickel, manganese and iron.
MMPG - ICPMMN - Baia Mare - AND RESEARCH CENTER FOR RADIOACTIVE METAL - Magurele - Bucharest - Analysis Bulletin no. 334 on A-1975-sample symbol CNST - Bucharest: Al - 74.17% Cu - 4.62% Zn - 1.81% Pb - 0.11% Sn - 0.33% Ni - 0 , 0024% Bi - 0.0003% Ag - 0.0002%, Co - 0.0023%, Cd - 0.11% Zr - 0.20%. Ga - traces and Si - now. Note: Due to lack of material, they could not dose other elements, although their presence was detected during analysis. Section chief, Dr. Ing. Niederkorn I. Chief collectively researchers. Ing. Neciu St., Researcher. Princ., M. Gradin.
RESEARCH CENTER FOR RADIOACTIVE METAL - Magurele Commune - Analysis Bulletin nr.380, sample NK-2, brought by Dr. Eng. John Niederkorn: Al - 92.74% Si - 2.84%, Cu - 6.2% Zn - 0.95% Pb - 0.41% Sn - 0.33% Ni - 0.002% Bi - 0.0003, Ag - 0.0002%, Co - 0.002% Cd - 0.055, Zr - 0.20%.
Link< br />
The object was sent to the Institute of Archaeology in Cluj-Napoca, to be examined. Dr. Niederkorn analyzed the composition of this artifact and concluded that it is a very complex metal alloy. 12 elements came together to form the "heel aluminum Aiud". It is, thus, composed of 89% aluminum, 6.2% copper, 2.84% silicon, 1.81% zinc, 0.41% lead, 0.33% tin, 0.2% zirconium, 0.11% cadmium, nickel 0.0024%, 0.0023% cobalt, 0.0003% bismuth and gallium traces. In addition, this strange object is covered with a thin layer of aluminum oxide which is at least 300-400 old years.
Link
So it's all over the place, depending on who is doing the testing, with aluminum percentage ranging from 74.17% to 92.74%, which is a big difference. The ones that go out to the ten-thousandths place would seem to be the most accurate, though three of them do that and they still differ drastically from each other. The only thing I see in common among all of them, aside from aluminum being the primary metal, is copper being the second-most prominent metal, ranging from 4.62% to 6.5%, depending on the test.
On this Wikipedia page - en.wikipedia.org... - there is a list of some aluminum alloys by composition, and most of them have a very low copper percentage, except for 2014, 2024, and 2219 (2000 series), all of which have copper percentages similar to the test results of this mystery object. Wikipedia says this about the 2000 series alloy:
2000 series are alloyed with copper, can be precipitation hardened to strengths comparable to steel. Formerly referred to as duralumin, they were once the most common aerospace alloys, but were susceptible to stress corrosion cracking and are increasingly replaced by 7000 series in new designs.
As for the object's age, it seems they are going by the thickness of the aluminum oxide layer on it, which is said to be over 1mm thick. Various Romanian sites mentioned that, for example:
A totally unusual was the existence of an abnormal layer of aluminum oxide on the entire surface of the object. It is known that this metal oxidizes very hard in depth, usually covering itself with a protective oxide surface layer that limits the oxidation phenomenon of mass penetration of metal. The most plausible explanation seems to be from this point of view, very old object ... But aluminum was discovered in the laboratory in 1825 by Oersted, and its production industrially started only in 1883 ... in a century it was virtually impossible to produce an oxide layer so thick.
Has been said on this occasion that some experts have estimated by evaluating the aluminum oxide layer thicker than a millimeter object discovered at Aiud could have fantastic age of 250,000 years!
Link< br />
So it seems to be a cast and/or machined piece of Duralumin, found 33 feet down alongside mastodon bones, with a 1mm+ thick layer of aluminum oxide, and in 43 years, no one has identified it, even though, based on its size, it would seem to belong to a large and conspicuous machine, and should be easy to identify, especially by the people native to the country in which it was found. It's very bizarre.
ETA: This is interesting:
Corrosion protection
Although the addition of copper improves strength, it also makes these alloys susceptible to corrosion. For sheet products, corrosion resistance can be greatly enhanced by metallurgical bonding of a high-purity aluminium surface layer. These sheets are referred to as alclad, and are commonly used by the aircraft industry.
en.wikipedia.org...
That could explain the varying alloy composition results (though it says it's for sheet products, so it may not apply here), because the surface layer would be a different alloy than the rest of it. I wonder if there could be intermetallic alloys between the surface layer and the core as well.
Also interesting is that that same article says that Duralumin's composition and heat treatment were a German wartime secret.
originally posted by: IVANV
So much disinformation.. Poster above has even switched the name of the institutes and compositions and made up compositions.
originally posted by: Atsbhct
originally posted by: Atsbhct
a reply to: GreenGunther
It looks something like a link from a tanks tracks.
Scratch this theory.
Someone in the comments of the article stated they thought it looked like a tooth from an excavator bucket. I think that's more than believable.
originally posted by: evc1shop
TO me, it looks like a locking lever (pawl) in an escapement mechanism or part of a Gear and Pawl ratcheting assembly possibly used on a crane cable spool or something like that. I see there is what looks to be a very smooth bore that still has a polished finish on it and then there is a round blind hole on the flat portion that could have easily held the end of a release rod use to push the pawl out of the position so the gear it locks can spin freely. It doesn't look that old to me though it could be a UFO (unknown found object)
originally posted by: Tardacus
This is really interesting.
"Lab tests concluded it is an old UFO fragment given that the substances it comprises cannot be combined with technology available on Earth."
we still don`t possess the technology to combine those particular 13 types of metal.
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: Tardacus
This is really interesting.
"Lab tests concluded it is an old UFO fragment given that the substances it comprises cannot be combined with technology available on Earth."
we still don`t possess the technology to combine those particular 13 types of metal.
BS
It's an example of the 2000 series of aluminum alloys.
That's not a date, by the way. Architectural aluminum uses the 6000 series.
Harte
Alloying elements
In addition to aluminum, the main materials constituting duralumin are copper, manganese and magnesium.
en.wikipedia.org...
aluminum - 88%
copper - 6.20%
silicon - 2.84%
zinc - 1.81%
lead - 0.41%
tin - 0.33%
zirconium - 0.2%
cadmium - 0.11%
nickel - 0.0024%
cobalt - 0.0023%
bismuth - 0.0003%
silver - 0.0002%
gallium - traces
originally posted by: Harte
a reply to: MaximRecoil
Maybe I got the wrong series. Try the 5000 series. It's been over a decade since I worked in the industry, and we primarily used the 6000 series.
At any rate, the post I responded to was certainly BS, as it said "we still don`t possess the technology to combine those particular 13 types of metal."
Harte
originally posted by: MaximRecoil
originally posted by: Harte
a reply to: MaximRecoil
Maybe I got the wrong series. Try the 5000 series. It's been over a decade since I worked in the industry, and we primarily used the 6000 series.
At any rate, the post I responded to was certainly BS, as it said "we still don`t possess the technology to combine those particular 13 types of metal."
Harte
It definitely isn't 5000 series, which has a low copper percentage (0.8% at the most), and up to 6.2% magnesium. I think it would be considered 2000 series if someone were to manufacture that particular recipe today; I just don't think it is any currently known/established variety of 2000 series, i.e., I think it would be given a 2XXX number that isn't currently in use.