It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Nucleardoom
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Nucleardoom
yes, but that decency and respect for life has to extend out beyond the womb.
and at the moment I don't think it does in the republican camp.
Millions respectfully disagree with you.
originally posted by: Nucleardoom
originally posted by: Nucleardoom
So the father should have no say in the life he has also created?
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Nucleardoom
No none at all.
Well good luck to your future offspring as it seems they may never see the light of day with your nazi viewpoint on parental rights. But it seems you wouldn't care too much about killing them anyway.
Parent of the year award winner right there.
originally posted by: Nucleardoom
I refer to it as human decency and a respect for life.
But who needs that nowadays right?
originally posted by: eNumbra
More redefinition.
Whatever it takes.
I am ok with earlier abortions. It should never got to that point and if the woman life is in danger different story as well. The law gives the ability with a good lawyer to abort whenever no?
The further along a woman is in her pregnancy, the more likely a doctor is to induce labor, rather than perform an abortion, but some practitioners may be able to perform an abortion up to 34 weeks, Gunter said.
But at 38 to 39 weeks of pregnancy, if it's clear that the fetus will not survive long after birth, a modified abortion is no longer an option. A health care provider induces labor, and this "is simply called a delivery," Gunter said.
www.livescience.com...
originally posted by: Grimpachi
Mental midgets that go around calling people Nazis doesn't have any right to require anything of a woman he happens to get lucky with to bring that mental midgets offspring into the world. Those mental midgets should just be happy they managed to get laid in the first place.
originally posted by: GoShredAK
If a baby was getting close to term and suddenly needs to come out to keep baby and mother alive why wouldn't they just do an emergency C-section?
Then mom and baby just have to stay in the hospital and recover.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Nucleardoom
Hitler's own belief that they should ... As well as promoting motherhood, the Nazis also restricted abortion and contraception.
I certainly do not align with that wack jobs thinking how about you? Do facts get in your way of BS labeling people Nazis they should, but carry on I know you will.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Nucleardoom
there is no abortion that close to birth...
it's not an option!!!
that only leaves inducing labor or c-section...
so which is it that you think trump is talking about??
or is he just showing his ignorance here???
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
originally posted by: randomthoughts12
Hillary could not deny that the law gives the ability to take the baby 1 day before birth.
"That is not what happens in these cases" is what she said.
Donald clearly pointed out only god has that right.
This just gave me the creeps about her even more.
Lol that won't be the story. The story will be that Trump is stupid enough to think you can have an abortion the couple days before it's due..
Which isn't accurate nor anything ANYONE has done.
Hell he even pooped all over the pro life argument by not challenging Hillary quote his "penalize the woman stance" that pro lifers learned decades ago was a HUGE loser.
Trump once again played to his base and ran off everyone else.
What is more disturbing- that a Presidential candidate is practically foaming at the mouth to terminate lives, or the fact that the most awful people in the country were in the audience cheering her on? Literally cheering her on for saying mothers have the authority to do whatever they want with fully grown babies about to exit the womb.