It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Nucleardoom
originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: randomthoughts12
I'm anti-abortion and religious and that's still bullsh*t to me.
It's the pregnant woman's right. No one else.
I call bullsh*t on that. Granted the woman carries the baby, but what about the other half that created that life?
So the father should have no say in the life he has also created?
penalize the woman
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Bone75
So your answer is yes, you would choose to put your newborn child through endless suffering until they die.
Bet you wouldn't do that to your dog.
So a dog doesn't deserve to suffer but a human fetus does. Wow, that's messed up.
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: Hazardous1408
The same is true for the woman equally. She's has the choice to absolve herself of responsibilities, so should the man.
It's called equality.
Article 3 of the UN Human Rights states everyone has the right to life. Fetuses are a stage in human development thus they are human.
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
Then you may get depressed when you come to the realization that those are the two that can become president.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: ksiezyc
Fine. But only persons that has been "born" have rights, according to the UN and according to the US Constitution.
The unborn do not have rights. Period.