It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Donald Trump refuses to say whether he'll accept election results

page: 8
91
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 09:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Greggers

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Who cares if he refuses to accept the election results?


People who fear he might incite rioting or other forms of violence among his less stable followers.


The only ones with any history of violence have been the Hillary supporters.

Go break a window.




posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 09:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Greggers

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Who cares if he refuses to accept the election results?


People who fear he might incite rioting or other forms of violence among his less stable followers.


The only ones with any history of violence have been the Hillary supporters.

Go break a window.


Why would I break a window?

Hey man, I was just answering your question.

No one really cares if Trump whines and cries about the election result. What people care about is the possibility that there will not be a "peaceful" transition of power.


edit on 21-10-2016 by Greggers because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 09:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: xuenchen

That's politicians for you-stooping to the lowest common denominator.

However Trump seems to be suffering from Footin mouthis and his hare brained schemes are as hilarious as those created by Wile E. Coyote. Hillary doesn't speak for Trump-his oratorical faux pas's are his fault and his alone and that will lose him the election.

Even Rigging won't save him now.


I remember how absolutely STUNNED people were who were supporting Al Gore's campaign, when he lost to Bush. What will you do when Trump wins? Pull the hair you still have all out?



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 09:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

If what you say is true, can you imagine how easily everyone would have walked all over him in office ???

A true punk, old punk yes, and afraid as all hell.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 09:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: xuenchen

That's politicians for you-stooping to the lowest common denominator.

However Trump seems to be suffering from Footin mouthis and his hare brained schemes are as hilarious as those created by Wile E. Coyote. Hillary doesn't speak for Trump-his oratorical faux pas's are his fault and his alone and that will lose him the election.

Even Rigging won't save him now.


I remember how absolutely STUNNED people were who were supporting Al Gore's campaign, when he lost to Bush. What will you do when Trump wins? Pull the hair you still have all out?


But, Gore actually did not lose.

And there was proof of tampering with Diebold machines.

I followed this one closely - - as I was online at the time.

There was definite reason for protest and outrage over that election.


edit on 21-10-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 09:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: greyhat
Giving up and kissing the feet of someone who politically raped you isn't taking high ground, that's called Stockholm syndrome.

Conceding defeat like a man isn't "kissing their feet". Are you one of those assholes who spits in their hand when teams line up to shake hands after a game or something?


And remember the Florida recount.

I remember it. Do you? Gore challenged the election because there appeared to be credible evidence of fraud, after the voting had already taken place. He lost that gamble and then ultimately conceded defeat too. Or did you forget that part? I didn't.


Without rule of law in the election process you have no working government, you just have a mafia mob ruling you if the so called "winner" rigged the game.

Thanks for the non sequitur.


When you then go on to endorse the gangster who had you ridden out of the race by illegal means, that are somehow legal.....that is kissing feet dude.

Sure glad I don't have to think like you do, and bow down gracefully just because the sewer "system" says that is how things should be.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 09:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Who is suggesting to disrupt the flow of government and tear it apart ?

Trump. He can't accept that he is losing and blaming everyone but himself which is going a long way to tearing apart our government and will contribute to further government dysfunction after the election as people's biases prevent them from supporting anything Hillary decides to implement or push.

Bernie on the other hand knows that he can do more good by not breaking the system but working within it and changing minds. The peaceful way that we've always done it.


Bill Clinton helped seal Nafta and outsourcing which we the middle class is still paying for . He was president between 93-01 which allowed him to benefit from the dot com bubble .

That is like giving credit to Bush for the boom real estate market during his first term.

Ah I see. So if it is something that is good we can't give credit to the President for it, but if it's bad it's ALWAYS the President's fault. At least that's the narrative I see here on ATS, and you aren't doing a lot to dispel it here. Clearly this is an unwinnable argument for me if Bill can't take credit for the positive things that happened during his Presidency.


Ya, in Krazy's world the rich elite always win, but let us badmouth Trump for taking advantage of all the "cheats".

If all of this is true, why complain about not seeing Trump's taxes..clearly he WON that along time ago, everyone should gracefully acknowledge they lost to him and he does not have to pay taxes.

Bernie is the village idiot.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 09:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Will you say that Trump wins if there is evidence of tampering?



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 09:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: roadgravel
High probability is that if he loses, he'll whine and claims fraud for 10 years, maybe the rest of his life. Trump always wins, he can't lose without losing face.

No surprise his daughter just stated her father would never lie to the American people. I guess she hasn't seen the tapes from the last few months. He's forgetting what lies he is telling.


Who cares ?

And not only that, but what lies are you talking about ??

I have seen a lot of spin and talk about lies, and yet like Hillary, when questioned, it is all slanted opinion pieces by morons without a brain.

And by the way, when Hillary stated what she will do as President, she never said anything about the HOW, it was the worst most stale promise speech anyone has ever heard, and not once was asked HOW she would do any of it.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 09:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Will you say that Trump wins if there is evidence of tampering?



This is nothing like what happened with the Diebold machines.



Diebold: the controversial manufacturer of voting and ATM machines, whose name conjures up the demons of Ohio’s 2004 presidential election irregularities, is now finally under indictment for a “worldwide pattern of criminal conduct.” Federal prosecutors filed charges against Diebold, Inc. on Tuesday, October 22, 2013 alleging that the North Canton, Ohio-based security and manufacturing company bribed government officials and falsified documents to obtain business in China, Indonesia and Russia. Diebold has agreed to pay $50 million to settle the two criminal counts against it. This is not the first time Diebold’s been accused of bribery. columbusfreepress.com...



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 09:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Can you be sure? I mean we still have a bit until vote day.



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:00 PM
link   
a reply to: kruphix

Like the inventor of the Internet? Gore brought us closer to the banana republic the left desires than Trump ever could. Boo Hoo, Trump hurt your snowflake sensibilities again? Feel a bit triggerd with your double standard? LOL..



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:36 PM
link   
a reply to: JimmyJones63

Had Gore not been selected, but elected, as he was, I do not believe that 9/11 would have happened.

Many black voters were disenfranchised in Florida. That was stolen, then Cheney enters the oval office with his briefcase of plans and the rest is history.

edit on 21-10-2016 by AnkhMorpork because: damn typo!



posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 10:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: JimmyJones63
a reply to: kruphix

Like the inventor of the Internet? Gore brought us closer to the banana republic the left desires than Trump ever could. Boo Hoo, Trump hurt your snowflake sensibilities again? Feel a bit triggerd with your double standard? LOL..


Gore was actually very instrumental in getting the internet public.



posted on Oct, 22 2016 @ 05:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: xuenchen

That's politicians for you-stooping to the lowest common denominator.

However Trump seems to be suffering from Footin mouthis and his hare brained schemes are as hilarious as those created by Wile E. Coyote. Hillary doesn't speak for Trump-his oratorical faux pas's are his fault and his alone and that will lose him the election.

Even Rigging won't save him now.


I remember how absolutely STUNNED people were who were supporting Al Gore's campaign, when he lost to Bush. What will you do when Trump wins? Pull the hair you still have all out?


But, Gore actually did not lose.

And there was proof of tampering with Diebold machines.

I followed this one closely - - as I was online at the time.

There was definite reason for protest and outrage over that election.



I know about that, and I never supported Bush because of that, and his threats against Ross Perot's family which was why Perot quit. And we also know Obama used Mafia help to win his senate seat and we also know those machines were heavily manipulated by someone dirty who wanted Obama to win. His multi-billion dollar payoffs to friends is proof of scum baggery of the worst kind, and Hillary represents these same very dirty people, and if it comes to pass again, America is deader than road kill. You can't support scum like that and close your eyes to just those you don't like because of their party affiliation, and expect to keep waking up to pretty flowers and rainbows, because it will burn right down to the ground with these kinds of crooks in charge eventually.



posted on Oct, 22 2016 @ 05:35 AM
link   
a reply to: kruphix

its not even going to be close so trump can say what he wants.

if he doesnt concede supreme court will just make the choice for him quickly. i doubt it takes a week even cuz its gonna be a landslide victory or clinton.

look at arizona he is going to lose arizona even.

and utah lol, utah has been republican for 52 years and because of trump, the independent is leading in utah over the republican candidate.



posted on Oct, 22 2016 @ 05:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: xuenchen

That's politicians for you-stooping to the lowest common denominator.

However Trump seems to be suffering from Footin mouthis and his hare brained schemes are as hilarious as those created by Wile E. Coyote. Hillary doesn't speak for Trump-his oratorical faux pas's are his fault and his alone and that will lose him the election.

Even Rigging won't save him now.


I remember how absolutely STUNNED people were who were supporting Al Gore's campaign, when he lost to Bush. What will you do when Trump wins? Pull the hair you still have all out?


But, Gore actually did not lose.

And there was proof of tampering with Diebold machines.

I followed this one closely - - as I was online at the time.

There was definite reason for protest and outrage over that election.



Which makes Trump's decision to hold judgement absolutely fine, and somewhat smart.



posted on Oct, 22 2016 @ 06:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: Drawsoho
If they steal it he will be like mount Krakatoa.
And I hope he takes it to court and all the #
that they did to win it will be exposed and that
means Hillary will be wearing prison stripes.

a reply to: Chance321



you gotta be realistic.

thinking trump is going to win is delusional.

look at utah, republican or over 50 years. the reddest state in the union.

because of trump , the independent is leading the republican candidate in utah.

if trump cant win utah, hillary is going to win in a landslide so you dont have to worry about it being close or contested.



posted on Oct, 22 2016 @ 06:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Greggers

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Who cares if he refuses to accept the election results?


People who fear he might incite rioting or other forms of violence among his less stable followers.


Yeah, I don't know if you noticed or not, but it's not them that do the rioting in this country.

That's a Democrat tactic. And they aren't even considered unstable by other Democrats.



posted on Oct, 22 2016 @ 07:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: xuenchen

That's politicians for you-stooping to the lowest common denominator.

However Trump seems to be suffering from Footin mouthis and his hare brained schemes are as hilarious as those created by Wile E. Coyote. Hillary doesn't speak for Trump-his oratorical faux pas's are his fault and his alone and that will lose him the election.

Even Rigging won't save him now.


I remember how absolutely STUNNED people were who were supporting Al Gore's campaign, when he lost to Bush. What will you do when Trump wins? Pull the hair you still have all out?


But, Gore actually did not lose.

And there was proof of tampering with Diebold machines.

I followed this one closely - - as I was online at the time.

There was definite reason for protest and outrage over that election.



So did I, and so was I.

It's what got me interested in politics more than just a passing interest.

However, as much as I disliked Gore, I started out thinking "Yeah, lets recount, and make sure" then as time went on, and more and more recounts were demanded, and it went from "hanging chads" to "dimpled chads" I thought they were pushing it. It made me see how Liberals will not accept anything other than their view. Which is an observation that's still true today. More so really.

There has been reports of votes switched from Republican to Democrat in electronic voting machines recently too. So, if you were against it then, you should be against it now. They called it a "CALIBRATION ERROR" As someone who has built and repaired touch screens for a living, I can tell you a calibration error cannot happen the same way every time on different machines. That's just statistically impossible.

There was reason, in your opinion. Who are you to deny anyone else that right?

I personally don't think Gore won. He won the popular vote, but that's irrelevant as we all know. He lost due to the electoral college system. A system I've believed for a longtime is flawed. However, it's what we have, and I don't see it changing as long as BOTH parties continue to manipulate it. They'd have to unite on the issue, and what are the chances of EITHER one taking that stance, let alone agreeing with the other party.

Reason #14378 why I'm an Independent.

edit on 22-10-2016 by poncho1982 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
91
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join