It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Who Won the debate?

page: 8
62
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:39 PM
link   
Paid agitators, fact.

Hillary, no response.

Accept it or not.

Trump smashed her.




posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: reldra

It doesn't #en matter, we've all lost. In just glad i served this country when it mattered, and that i homeless because it can all go to # and i won't even know, thats not a resignation of my love for this country but rather an acceptance of the absurdity.



Plus, women love me out here regardless of political leaning.


And don't forget y'all never give up, and ...





I know alot of times we don't agree, but I have your back brother vet.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: John_Rodger_Cornman
I vote for someone whom I agree with the most on policy.

It is not horse racing or a football game.


See, that's what you're getting wrong.

Do you see anyone trying to reach a consensus?
This is sports.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:42 PM
link   
a reply to: cavtrooper7

Thats an effing joke..

www.politifact.com...


Were they dead broke?

All this begs the question of whether someone who can afford to buy a $2.85 million house is "dead broke." We reached two accounting professors at Ohio State University’s Fisher College of Business, one of the top-ranked schools in the country. Assistant Professor Jeffrey Hoopes said to call the Clintons dead broke would be a stretch for how the term is commonly understood.

"Almost any president leaving office can expect tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars of future earnings as a result of their having been president," Hoopes said. "Speaking, consulting, board positions, and so on, are all very lucrative."



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: John_Rodger_Cornman
Hopefully we never vote in another republican or democrat ever.



I was thinking of the thing where if a third party gets a certain percent of the vote, they get matching funds in 2020. Then I studied both Johnson and Stein. In a FB app-like survey, I had matched with Stein 2nd after Sanders.

Then I studied their platforms.


Jill Stein wants to eliminate student debt, a noble cause I am all for...but how she says she can do it is incorrect. She cannot do it the way she says.

Gary Johnson is often incoherent.

There was no real third choice after Sanders exited.

edit on 19-10-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)

edit on 19-10-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)

edit on 19-10-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: reldra

Where did she get RICH after she was so broke?


How did Trump get rich after he bankrupted 4 or 5 times?



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:46 PM
link   
a reply to: BubbaJoe

I spent SIX not really.
They TOO have a command structure.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: BubbaJoe

originally posted by: John_Rodger_Cornman

originally posted by: BubbaJoe

originally posted by: DePlOrAbLeAmErIcAn
a reply to: reldra

I hope you vote for Gary Johnson...


And that will be a vote that doesn't count.


I vote for someone whom I agree with the most on policy.

Hopefully we can get past the 5% level for federal matching funds and easier ballot access.

It is not horse racing or a football game.


There are only two votes in this race due to the electoral college, if your candidate doesn't make the cut, basically you vote don't count. I do not disagree with you though.


Not exactly.

Objective A: Win the election outright. (Not happening without getting into the debates AND getting big donor money)

Objective B: Prevent Hillary or Trump from getting 270.(Still in play)

Objective C: Get above 5% for matching federal funding and easier ballot access(Still in play)

Objective D: Promote the Libertarian Party to independents,challenge the CPD excluding third parties and prepare for 2020. (Done. But could have been better if we qualified for the debates)



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:46 PM
link   
a reply to: BubbaJoe

Thanks bubbajoe from Misery....for the reply

edit on 19-10-2016 by Encryptor because: MISERY HAS NO FRIENDS



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:47 PM
link   
a reply to: BubbaJoe
Using what passes for business these days.
AND rebuilt his porfolio THUS actually accomplishing RATHER than continue a traitors path.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:47 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

It was even until he mentioned the Chicago protest of his rally and the project veritas clips.

She nearly shat a brick and kept it clenched from there on out.

She was a s-l-o-w t-a-l-k-i-n-g mess. Nervous, mumbling to herself, and un convincing the way an bad actor is on a scene they have done too many times with no breaks.

I guess people see what they want to see, but those without a filter saw it. The media saw it and was shaken. The Trump presidency became a scary reality for them tonight.

He has the popular vote in the bag....


edit on 10 19 2016 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: kyleplatinum
Paid agitators, fact.

Hillary, no response.

Accept it or not.

Trump smashed her.



No, he didn't.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:49 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

Cellphone app+ PROGRAMMING stupid.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:49 PM
link   
a reply to: TechniXcality

I wish I could help you right now Tech!



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: John_Rodger_Cornman
Hopefully we never vote in another republican or democrat ever.



I was thinking of the thing where if a third party gets a certain percent of the vote, they get matching funds in 2020. Then I studied both Johnson and Stein. In a FB app-like survey, I had matched with Stein 2nd after Sanders.

Then I studied their platforms.


Jill Stein wants to eliminate student debt, a noble cause I am all for...but how she says she can do it is incorrect. She cannot do it the way she says.

Gary Johnson is often incoherent.

There was no real third choice after Sanders exited.


Gary Johnson is socially liberal and fiscally conservative. A classical liberal.
He shares values with most independents and moderates.
Only one problem. He's not a far right neo-con or a far-left delusional progressive.
So they both hate him.

Hopefully we can get on TV in 2020 and not be excluded by the CPD.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Puppylove
No one won. We all lost by having the debate in the first place.


There is a winner and a loser of a debate. Whether or not the people in general won is a matter of opinion. Your opinion on that is fine.


None of these should be really called "debates" since nothing was really ever "debated".

Notice how Hillary did not answer one tough question again ???

I did like how her eyes looked while Trump made his last statement, she looked like a lost deer in the headlights, hoping and praying people do not have her whole universe deconstructed.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jdennis10
a reply to: TechniXcality

I wish I could help you right now Tech!


That was really cool of you, i'd help too. Maybe a Pool to help you out Tech i know a lot of ATS'rs would pitch in!



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: reldra

It doesn't #en matter, we've all lost. Im just glad i served this country when it mattered, and that i homeless because it can all go to # and i won't even know, thats not a resignation of my love for this country but rather an acceptance of the absurdity.



Plus, women love me out here regardless of political leaning.

And don't forget y'all never give up, and ...




Tech, the 'we've all lost' answer was already given to this thread, which is not an answer. It would be if it was a 3 part question.

Tech, you resigned your life, is what you did. I watched the night it happened. I begged that you go back to your parents. I begged that you go to welfare and get an apartment. I have spent significant amounts of time doing that as well as just talking to you.

Then come into my thread and say it just doesn't matter. It matters to me. You matter to me. But f it, apaprently what matters to me does not count.

Clinton won the debate. Your picture in a sleeping bag and a blunt will not sway me.

Thanks so much for sticking up for me.




edit on 19-10-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12
I don't know who won but the democrats are doing a happy dance and the republicans are asking themselves "why" did we nominate that guy.


What would make you think that ???

And by the way who are "the republicans" anyways.

A whole lot of people are voting for who they think will make the changes necessary, and are certainly entirely sick of anything to come out of Hillary's mouth.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 10:58 PM
link   
Who won the debate?

Big business won. And we are all paying it for the privilege of losing.
edit on 19-10-2016 by TzarChasm because: (no reason given)







 
62
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join