It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Who Won the debate?

page: 12
62
<< 9  10  11    13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 12:49 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

Watched the debate and rewatched it - and Trump won both times.

Did you notice, hillary revealed US nuclear response time... pretty nice indeedos... she is a beauty.




posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 01:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: deckdel
a reply to: reldra

Watched the debate and rewatched it - and Trump won both times.

Did you notice, hillary revealed US nuclear response time... pretty nice indeedos... she is a beauty.


Us nuclear response time is publicly available information.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 01:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: deckdel
a reply to: reldra

Watched the debate and rewatched it - and Trump won both times.

Did you notice, hillary revealed US nuclear response time... pretty nice indeedos... she is a beauty.


Classic!



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 01:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: deckdel
a reply to: reldra

Watched the debate and rewatched it - and Trump won both times.

Did you notice, hillary revealed US nuclear response time... pretty nice indeedos... she is a beauty.


Classic!



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 01:24 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

It does make me wonder, introvert. If you could imagine a debate Clinton wouldn't win against a "conservative'



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 01:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
I think it's easy to say that Clinton "won" this debate, simply because she remained on point and was able to articulate her responses quite well. She presented herself well.

Trump, on the other hand, appeared to be much more restrained but lacked in substance. In fact, you could have taken a Right Wing conspiracy theorist, dressed him in a nice suit, put him on stage and the overall message/rhetoric would have been the same. He was regurgitating conspiratorial nonsense.

The claims of a rigged election and personal attacks mimic much of the same content we see posted on this very site.


What conspiracies? I didn't hear any.

Other than the rigged election, which in my opinion isn't a conspiracy. When George Soros owns all the voting machines in every battleground state, and when we have democratic operatives on video rigging elections then in my opinion it's unpatriotic not to question election results.

Elections are the cornerstone of our democracy, if we never question it then we are ignoring our foundation.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 01:27 PM
link   
a reply to: xstealth

You can't tell a self proclaimed socialist that



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 01:27 PM
link   
a reply to: xstealth

You can't tell a self proclaimed socialist that

... It may need to be said twice, but #ed i hate WiFi
edit on 20-10-2016 by TechniXcality because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 01:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: introvert

It does make me wonder, introvert. If you could imagine a debate Clinton wouldn't win against a "conservative'


A much better informed "conservative" could have challenged her on issues like foreign policy, highlighting some of the current administrations missteps. The problem is, Trump is not well-informed.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 01:48 PM
link   
a reply to: xstealth



What conspiracies? I didn't hear any.

Other than the rigged election, which in my opinion isn't a conspiracy. When George Soros owns all the voting machines in every battleground state, and when we have democratic operatives on video rigging elections then in my opinion it's unpatriotic not to question election results.


You prove my point. We could have put you on stage and we probably couldn't tell the difference between you and Trump.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 01:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xstealth



What conspiracies? I didn't hear any.

Other than the rigged election, which in my opinion isn't a conspiracy. When George Soros owns all the voting machines in every battleground state, and when we have democratic operatives on video rigging elections then in my opinion it's unpatriotic not to question election results.


You prove my point. We could have put you on stage and we probably couldn't tell the difference between you and Trump.


I'm not sure you ever had a point for me to prove.

Unyielding trust in government isn't a point, it's propaganda.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 01:57 PM
link   
The candidate you liked more before you heard the debate, that is who won.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 01:59 PM
link   
a reply to: xstealth



I'm not sure you ever had a point for me to prove.


Perhaps you did not comprehend what I said in my first post. We could have taken any number of Right Wing conspiracy theorists, put them in a suit, stood them in front of the podium and they would have spit the same rhetoric as Trump.

"The election is rigged"...blah blah.



Unyielding trust in government isn't a point, it's propaganda.


This is not about unyielding trust in government. It's about having proof the election is rigged before you cry conspiracy.

The same thing happened with Benghazi and the email issue. The conspiracies were created before the decisions or findings were made public in order to insulate those that were not willing to believe the results, unless the results were in their favor.

There is a pattern here.
edit on 20-10-2016 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 02:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

This is not about unyielding trust in government. It's about having proof the election is rigged before you cry conspiracy.

The same thing happened with Benghazi and the email issue. The conspiracies were created before the decisions or findings were made public in order to insulate those that were not willing to believe the results, unless the results were in their favor.

There is a pattern here.


We have proof



www.washingtontimes.com...

townhall.com...

www.indystar.com...


I know you don't care, because they always vote for your side.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 02:24 PM
link   
Once again, Hillary Clinton proved she was a better politician.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump proved he was a better human being.

Which isn't saying much, Trump has been a rather awful human being. He is just less awful than Hillary in that regard.

But Americans aren't voting for a Vicar of the Catholic Church.
And Americans have no need of more Politicians lying to them while their taxes increase and their borders crumble.

Donald Trump is a plumber. He smells like a sewer and his rear end is showing. But, the pipes are busted.

America needs a Plumber

Not a Politician.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 02:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

Don;t feel bad, she had the facts, he didn't. We need someone who knows what the are doing.



ATS was at one time not to long ago hard on this sort of talk about career politicians. Not to mention the two party scam. And these were not even debates really.

But no sweep these lifer political hacks that cant even really read the constitution and want to over ride the constitution by SCOTUS appointments. She talks about continuing the work of the last 8 years yea right BS.
edit on 20-10-2016 by Logarock because: n



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 02:43 PM
link   
a reply to: xstealth



We have proof


That is not proof. That is the opinion of one man that does not provide the evidence to support the opinion. Also, those videos were released by a group/man known for releasing edited videos out of context for the sake of propaganda.

I've personally talked to them and they refuse to release the unedited footage. What does that tell you?



I know you don't care, because they always vote for your side


What side is that? I am not voting for either candidate in this election.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 03:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: xstealth



We have proof


That is not proof. That is the opinion of one man that does not provide the evidence to support the opinion. Also, those videos were released by a group/man known for releasing edited videos out of context for the sake of propaganda.

I've personally talked to them and they refuse to release the unedited footage. What does that tell you?



I know you don't care, because they always vote for your side


What side is that? I am not voting for either candidate in this election.


He's released 40 hours of unedited footage to all the media to verify the claims.

If it wasn't verified, you could guarantee the media would be screaming fraud, and there isn't a sound from them about it.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 03:08 PM
link   
a reply to: xstealth



He's released 40 hours of unedited footage to all the media to verify the claims.


Do you have a link to that claim? Like I said earlier, I talked to them personally and they stated that they would not release any unedited footage because everything was already in it's proper context.



If it wasn't verified, you could guarantee the media would be screaming fraud, and there isn't a sound from them about it.


Probably because the media looked like fools when they released the ACORN garbage and the Planned Parenthood fiasco.

No one takes them seriously, except for the partisan hacks. Show me the evidence there is voter fraud. Not opinion. Real evidence.



posted on Oct, 20 2016 @ 03:14 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert



watch it at 16:50, I've heard other news sources say they have all 40 hours and have many journalists verifying the unedited footage - but this is the only one I could find on youtube for proof.

But I'm sure they've had time to verify it now, 10 journalists watching 4 hours of footage each. If something was wrong with it, it would be headline news now.




top topics



 
62
<< 9  10  11    13  14 >>

log in

join