It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Lets Get Ready to Rumble!!!! (Trump Vs Clinton) Tonight 9pm ET FINAL DEBATE

page: 46
46
<< 43  44  45    47  48  49 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:41 PM
link   
Who cares if he doesn't accept the results? If he loses, he goes on vacation.




posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:41 PM
link   
Only one thing is certain about the results of this election.

America loses.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee


Trumps Done!


Yes... they are both done.

what's your point?



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: interupt42

Thos are all excellent. More important than that is what we're REALLY going to do about the effects of deindustrialization. It's like the 1980's all over again. The GOP candidate has trickle-down economics, the Democrat has the same s# basically but they keep acting like they're going to fix s# by raising the taxes on the wealthy.

For what? We don't need to raise more money to put more people on welfare. We need to figure out what we're going to do to put manual laborers to work in the face of an economy that simply doesn't need that percentage of manual laborers.


Probably why both candidates will lead us to a world war. Jobs for everybody.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:42 PM
link   
Did I see Vince Neil there?



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Mike Stivic

Or basically saying the same thing



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:42 PM
link   
Thoughts on the debate as a whole.

I thought Trump won the debate, but not a huge victory. I think that he had better points that weren't addressed about emails, taking money from the Saudis, her not doing anything for twenty years, and her allegedly hiring people to cause disruptions at her rally.

I thought that both seemed to interrupt, to go over time, and to ignore points addressed to them. Hillary did what she does, repeats her talking points.

Having said that, Trump is not a great debater. There were tons of times he could have said better things, but he didn't.

Chris Wallace did awesome. Tried to keep these two meatheads in line, and went after them we he should in a equal manner.

Media harping on him not accepting the results of the election already (which I knew would happen). Now I get to watch the crap show that is the media coverage of this.

Ah screw it, I may just watch Rick and Morty instead.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: liveandlearn

originally posted by: MisterSpock
First dishonest thing chris said all night...

"The decision is up to you".

I'll forgive him.


a very politically correct comment.. or just stating the truth...assuming no fraud.




The electoral college decides, and if need be they can act as a failsafe switch. Everyone knows this, especially chris.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:42 PM
link   
He's not a polished debater as she is, but in the hard hitting facts he annihilated her. She was purely in a defensive position, inherently so because hses been a deeply, grand canyon of a 'flawed' policy maker and he's the new guy from the outside.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:42 PM
link   
a reply to: kruphix

he did not say that
he said he would wait and see



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee




Trumps Done!


Yep. Put a fork in him.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:42 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

I don't agree at all.

I've read the communist manifesto, and Das Kapital, and the works of Lenin (most of them anyway). There's nothing like that in them.

Socialist governments have typically favoured expansion and development of domestic industry. Outsourcing is a tool of the corporatocratic establishment to make the rich even richer and the poor even poorer.

Us real lefties don't approve of rule by a corporate elite at all you know



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: kruphix
First thing all after shows are talking about.

TRUMP WON'T ACCEPT THE RESULT OF THE ELECTION.

Yeah, that's because they get their talking points by the same handful of the elite.

I mean, follow along. Flex those abs, tighten those hammies and pull your head out of the sand.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: kruphix
First thing all after shows are talking about.

TRUMP WON'T ACCEPT THE RESULT OF THE ELECTION.


Our public is so stupid. We respect the democratic process! (Except when the DNC rigs the primaries)



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: kruphix
First thing all after shows are talking about.

TRUMP WON'T ACCEPT THE RESULT OF THE ELECTION.


Could that be his closing zinger to stay in the news? NAH!

Is the voting / campaigning / electioneering process totally slanted and riggged against him? NAH!



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Trump interrupted Clinton constantly, he fought with the moderator, he called her a Nasty Women, he refused to say he would accept the results of the election, the audience LAUGHED at him when he said he respects women.

He was on the defense almost the entire night.

I'll admit, Trump did better in the first 45 minutes then he has done in any of the other debates...but fell on his face in the last 45 minutes.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:45 PM
link   
News media is AGHAST because Trump might not accept the results, if he loses. They compare him to all prior politicians who have lost. Trump is not a politicians!



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:45 PM
link   
The fact that anyone accepts any electoral result in America post 1965 is a damning indictment of American society in general tbh.



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: interupt42

Thos are all excellent. More important than that is what we're REALLY going to do about the effects of deindustrialization. It's like the 1980's all over again. The GOP candidate has trickle-down economics, the Democrat has the same s# basically but they keep acting like they're going to fix s# by raising the taxes on the wealthy.

For what? We don't need to raise more money to put more people on welfare. We need to figure out what we're going to do to put manual laborers to work in the face of an economy that simply doesn't need that percentage of manual laborers.


I will agree with you here. All of this talk of jobs, we need to understand that automation is eliminating many of these jobs. Wouldn't it be nice to have candidates that sought to lead us into the future?



posted on Oct, 19 2016 @ 09:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: kruphix

he did not say that
he said he would wait and see


But it doesn't matter what he said does it.

It matters that the media will be talking about how he won't accept the results for the next few weeks.



new topics

top topics



 
46
<< 43  44  45    47  48  49 >>

log in

join