It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

More proof CNN is truly the Clinton News Network

page: 4
48
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 08:21 AM
link   
a reply to: RickyD


As a director the last thing you ever want is to see bars and the tone...

But they will go to it if they have no other go to. Like un scripted content on live feed.

Obviously someone cut away form a reference to wikileaks. They probably argued beforehand about it.




posted on Oct, 21 2016 @ 09:17 PM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

To be honest the most likely scenario to me is the producer calling for the cut to bars. They probably have standing orders to do such things with the very idea that you can just fool everyone with this lost signal BS...and to most it will fool them. The producer is going to be the one with the power to over ride what the director would do naturally or instinctively. The producer is also the one who would always be right there watching with everyone in the production room with all the feeds. Producers are the ones who deal with the money men for the production too so go figure there...they're the direct go between for the news company and the production crew.



posted on Oct, 22 2016 @ 07:39 AM
link   
a reply to: RickyD


They probably have standing orders to do such things with the very idea that you can just fool everyone with this lost signal BS...and to most it will fool them.

We agree about that, color bars means they still have carrier signal.



posted on Oct, 22 2016 @ 02:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan




These guys really have no clue how Stalin-esque they've become, do they?


That was under the threat of death.

Here/CNN/OTHERS do so of their own free will.

Entirely more deplorable.


For the sake of argument, let's say that CNN is all-in for Clinton. Is that not their right? They have the freedom of the press and they can publish, print and air whatever they so choose.

You, also, have the right to freedom of the press. You can create your own outlet to counter CNN if you wish.



Does Wikileaks also have that freedom? If so -- for the sake of argument -- can you elaborate that fact to the Clinton supporters so they can stop crying about illegally obtained data, even though they praise the same data when it's Republicans falling victim? You're seemingly logical so I'm sure you'll understand.



posted on Oct, 22 2016 @ 03:22 PM
link   
I wonder if CNN would be taking the same approach if WikiLeaks was revealing something about Republicans?

.



posted on Oct, 22 2016 @ 09:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
I wonder if CNN would be taking the same approach if WikiLeaks was revealing something about Republicans?

.


They'd be all over it of course. Every logical mind can see that, and has seen that in the past. Wikileaks went from a godsend to democrats, to an evil entity.



posted on Oct, 23 2016 @ 01:51 PM
link   
Hey all, been a while... computer took a dump and like idiot did not have links backed up. Don't forget to backup your favs or links people lol. Anyway, this is a sore subject for me. So sore I have actually stopped watching all main stream media and only watch bbc or get news on the net now and that is sad. We created journalism, at least in the sense of what it used to be, a noble, honest, impartial profession.

In days gone by it was great men going into harms way to give you the story, the who, what, when, and where, and in a way that was impartial and did not slant one way or the other but rather presented just the facts and let the reader, or listener in most cases, make up their own minds.

This was the way it was meant to be. Today, it is all bought and paid for. Slanted for one candidate that the cabal wants to win, who knows will win because Trump is right, it is rigged. The elections in this country have been rigged for decades now and it was never meant to be this way.

It was not meant to let two parties control America, control the electoral college by manipulating boundaries, moving lines, fraud, etc etc... in fact it was meant that the vote of the people would decide the presidency. The electoral college is corrupt and outdated and this country was never meant to be strictly a two party system controlled by the college. It is time we changed all that... Notice I said we.

Little known fact, we can change things... and without taking up arms as Jefferson would have it. All we have to do is all get together, all the people rise up in each of our states and demand a constitutional convention. The states can call this convention and we can change everything, we can change our constitution and in so doing get our country back.

Some great things we could all agree on and do:

Term Limits for all public service: congress, president, all judges including supreme court
Balanced Budget Amendment written into the constitution and set in stone. (would mean instant over night smaller govt.)
Supreme Court: was never meant to be life long (40 plus years), give them term limits, make them voted on by public and not appointed by corrupt political system. Provide peoples over ride vote for anything the supreme court does. They were never meant to be God in this country or to write law and over ride Congress or the people period. Some say it is time to get rid of them all together.
Executive Orders: Never legal in the first place. Set it in stone so President can not be a dictator.
States Rights: Fed was never meant to have power over the states. If the people of state vote for no gay marriage, or for anything for that matter, that is their right. the Fed needs to get out of states business or maybe it is time to separate, period. States and citizens have right to govern themselves. Fed was never meant to ride rough shod over them as Lord and King.
Taxes: the govt. can't fix this, we could.

This is just a sample, it only takes 26 states to ratify these changes... we are talking common sense changes all of the real people can agree on to take our country back... something we could do....

Journalism in this country is dead.. does not exist anymore. Everyone should show their disgust by not watching, or reading them etc... write them scathing letters as I have and hurt them in their pocket books and maybe, maybe they will change...

the bot



posted on Oct, 23 2016 @ 06:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: masqua
a reply to: bastion

Please check your Private Messages.

Thanks


Thanks for the quick resolution - only posted it in public as was so confused, so thanking you and the job mods do in public to make it clear you guys weren't in the wrong and there's no 'conspiracy' here.



posted on Oct, 23 2016 @ 06:41 PM
link   
I'll bet if someone wanted to make an argument that CNN is in Trump's back pocket, they could have recorded hundreds of examples from earlier in the election. No candidate has ever gotten so much free press.

Of course, at this point, it's hard to find any story anywhere that favors Trump that isn't an outright lie or a distortion of some kind..

Perhaps someone with a video rig handy can record newscasts on all the major networks after this election is over to prove the MSM is in the Republican's back pocket.

Not because it's true. But just to show it can be done.
edit on 23-10-2016 by Greggers because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
48
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join