It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) reinforced his support for fossil fuels and his opposition to slashing carbon emissions, saying climate policy will hurt jobs, as he faced Democratic challenger Patrick Murphy in a debate Monday. Asked about sea level rise now affecting Florida, Rubio, a longtime climate denier, said he supports mitigation efforts but opposes laws that aim to cut carbon emissions. “If in fact sea levels are rising… we should spend money to mitigate that,” he said, but added that “as a policy maker, you have to show me whether the laws you want me to pass will actually impact the issue that you are raising. I have people that come to me and say: we want you to pass these laws on carbon emissions, and I ask them, well how many inches of sea rise will it prevent?” Miami, Rubio’s hometown, has been suffering from flooding as sea level rise, linked to the greenhouse gas emissions that drive climate change, continues. In fact, storm surges and higher tidal flows worsened by climate change could gobble 30 percent of Miami houses in the next 75 years, according to a recent study.
originally posted by: lostbook
So, Rubio is saying that he doesn't think that any laws passed won't affect the Sea levels that much.
Source: dailycaller.com...
As populations increase, the need for industry does as well. That means more water is drawn from the ground for industrial purposes. Add the weight of an increasing population and you have a recipe for subsidence. Water that once filled areas underground is now gone, and the land settles into these new hollow spaces.
Andrew Kiernan, a real estate expert from Franklin Street, makes the point that Miami Beach was built on sand, something that would lend itself to subsidence.
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: lostbook
I think the seas have been rising for thousands of years. And at a pretty steady pace. So climate change or not, building next to the ocean is something a historically challenged person might do.
It's a shame that the AGW crowd has just about erased those facts from view and now, all people see is fear mongering. If more truth was discussed and less hyperbole, I would think many more people would be on board with carbon mitigation.
originally posted by: scojak
originally posted by: lostbook
So, Rubio is saying that he doesn't think that any laws passed won't affect the Sea levels that much.
I don't have an opinion one way or the other on the guy, but from what I'm reading he is not saying that. He is asking for verifiable proof of a cause and effect before making a decision, something that all laws should need before they are enacted.
Obviously this type of proof would be very difficult to obtain for climate change, but he is not saying what you said and I don't believe in putting words in someones mouth.
At first sight, coal trade with the People’s Republic of China is currently facing a challenging period. In recent years, China has started to focus on environmental protection. Air pollution in China has become an actual threat to the citizens’ health. The country has therefore decided to reduce its coal consumption. In April 2016, The Chinese government took a decision to postpone the construction of about 200 new coal-fired power stations. Coal imports, including those from Russia, were reduced. China acquired about 25 million tons of Russian coal in 2014. In 2015, however, it only bought 15 million tons. The same procurement has been preserved at the same level in 2016. However, this reduction is most likely temporary. Russian coal mining business has good prospects in China. Despite all the measures to reduce coal consumption, China still remains its largest consumer. journal-neo.org...
originally posted by: MamaJ
a reply to: lostbook
I don't understand why we want to continue to interfere with mother nature.
We have raped and pillaged her enough with our will to bring about change that suits us.
If my area gets bad...I will move. The ancient people did that and so can we. We will be forced to.
If you want change start with yourself and go green, drive on ethanol or battery operated car. Plenty you can do to help Mother Earth.
This planet has ALWAYS maintained itself and will continue.
Climate has always changed this is nothing new..what's new is how man can maker a dollar off the climate changing.
Follow the money. The trail starts on the late 1800's early 1900's. Begin with the name John D. Rockefeller. You will find the many interests of our world today even in science but it all began with OIL.
Sea level cannot rise in certain places only, It either rises everywhere or it doesn't rise. That's simple physics.