It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Democratic heads roll after video shows agitators planted at Trump rallies

page: 3
79
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:02 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 




posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: spiritualzombie


Meanwhile Trump covered in his own feces says its rigged if he loses. Riiight.




Well....2 Dem campaign execs just got fired for it, so....there's that.


One got fired.

Bob Creamer did not "get fired", regardless of what O'Keefe says.

His statement is indicating that Democracy Partners is stepping back from their role with the Clinton campaign. Bob Creamer isn't stepping away from his job at Democracy Partners.



posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: xuenchen

They should be prosecuted.

People were hurt, people could have died, property was damaged during their planned attacks.


The first 2 brownshirts exposed.


Prosecuted for what exactly?

The video shows hypothetical schemes that were suggested by the planted fake donor.

So what exactly are the charges going to be?


You are flat-out lying now.


Ummmm....no.

If you watch the video released today, it is made very clear that the voter fraud scheme was suggested by the fake donor, who is a Project Veritas reporter. Foval "brainstormed" with him about it (O'Keefe's own words), and he ultimately told Foval that he isn't touching the fake donor's plan with a 10 foot poll because it sounded like voter fraud to him.

So in actuality, O'Keefe's video today just showed that Bob Creamer refused to participate in the fake donor's voter fraud scheme.



posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: xuenchen

They should be prosecuted.

People were hurt, people could have died, property was damaged during their planned attacks.


The first 2 brownshirts exposed.


Prosecuted for what exactly?

The video shows hypothetical schemes that were suggested by the planted fake donor.

So what exactly are the charges going to be?


Hmmmm....that's odd. Did you watch the same videos we did? Floval clearly stated on numerous occasions that he did exactly that....incited violence with instigators he had go to rallies.


We went over this plenty yesterday.

Foval stated that he organized protesters to go to Trump rallies.

It's not his fault that Trump supporters can't control themselves.


+4 more 
posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:08 PM
link   
a reply to: kruphix

There really is no end to your dishonesty.


+5 more 
posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:08 PM
link   
a reply to: kruphix

hahahaha

You're grasping at straws now.



posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: spiritualzombie


Meanwhile Trump covered in his own feces says its rigged if he loses. Riiight.




Well....2 Dem campaign execs just got fired for it, so....there's that.


One got fired.

Bob Creamer did not "get fired", regardless of what O'Keefe says.

His statement is indicating that Democracy Partners is stepping back from their role with the Clinton campaign. Bob Creamer isn't stepping away from his job at Democracy Partners.


Of course he isn't stepping away from his job at the company he co-founded....unless there is a BoD he doesn't have to. I would hazard a guess that you will see HRC heavily distance herself from this group. Had he not made that statement there would likely have been an even more damning statement by the DNC denouncing him....he HAD to do it to save his company.



posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: xuenchen

The two main guys in the Project Veritas 1 videos. Guess that gives the video serious credibility.



If Trump brings up the "RIGGED" theme tomorrow night, Hillary will simply say, "We identified 2 people causing disruptions and immediately fired them this week!'



posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: xuenchen

They should be prosecuted.

People were hurt, people could have died, property was damaged during their planned attacks.


The first 2 brownshirts exposed.


Prosecuted for what exactly?

The video shows hypothetical schemes that were suggested by the planted fake donor.

So what exactly are the charges going to be?


Hmmmm....that's odd. Did you watch the same videos we did? Floval clearly stated on numerous occasions that he did exactly that....incited violence with instigators he had go to rallies.


We went over this plenty yesterday.

Foval stated that he organized protesters to go to Trump rallies.

It's not his fault that Trump supporters can't control themselves.


Oh...so agitate agitate agitate until someone hits you.....THEN jump on FB Live and post it....probably texted to every protester he bussed in.



posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: kruphix

hahahaha

You're grasping at straws now.


How so?

Are you saying that Bob Creamer did not say to stay away from the fake donor's voter fraud scheme?



posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe

He didn't have to do it to save his company...his company will be fine.

He did it for his stated reason, to not become a distraction.

There is no secrecy here...it's just smart politics. You get out in front of a manufactured hit piece to shut it down.

Trump could learn a thing or two from Bob Creamer.



posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: xuenchen

They should be prosecuted.

People were hurt, people could have died, property was damaged during their planned attacks.


The first 2 brownshirts exposed.


Prosecuted for what exactly?

The video shows hypothetical schemes that were suggested by the planted fake donor.

So what exactly are the charges going to be?


You are flat-out lying now.


It might actually be Hillary herself. Lies just like her.



posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe




Oh...so agitate agitate agitate until someone hits you.....THEN jump on FB Live and post it....probably texted to every protester he bussed in.


Define agitate in this context.



posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: kruphix

hahahaha

You're grasping at straws now.


How so?

Are you saying that Bob Creamer did not say to stay away from the fake donor's voter fraud scheme?


Are you saying he didn't originally say they were good ideas and he began actually writing them down to go over? LOL! Pulled out his agenda and even said he was going to run it by his Latino counterpart....didn't sound like voter fraud to him then I guess...

Maybe he got a gut feeling he was being set up with the questions being posed and changed his mind to discuss by the second interview....

But yeah....guy is guilty as hell...I will BET you there will be more fall out from this and more will come out on him.

His company is likely done with the DNC for a while if not for good.



posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:25 PM
link   
a reply to: kruphix

Fired, quit, stepped back... Doesn't matter 2 DNC promoters/helpers that have the appearance of impropriety are gone. I would think the DNC would be grateful to have them gone, to lessen any appearance of corruption and/or impropriety that people may infer from the videos.



posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: kruphix

hahahaha

You're grasping at straws now.


How so?

Are you saying that Bob Creamer did not say to stay away from the fake donor's voter fraud scheme?


Are you saying he didn't originally say they were good ideas and he began actually writing them down to go over? LOL! Pulled out his agenda and even said he was going to run it by his Latino counterpart....didn't sound like voter fraud to him then I guess...

Maybe he got a gut feeling he was being set up with the questions being posed and changed his mind to discuss by the second interview....

But yeah....guy is guilty as hell...I will BET you there will be more fall out from this and more will come out on him.

His company is likely done with the DNC for a while if not for good.


Yes, he originally said he had to talk to the people who were more involved with voter registration. Then he came back and said emphatically NO.

You have to remember that he thinks he is dealing with a donor, you have to entertain donors to a point. You can't flat out insult them to their face. So what do you do? You lead them on, passing them off to the next person so it looks like you are interested in their crazy plans.

This isn't uncommon in any industry. Donors, investors, grantors...they are all catered to and lead to believe that they are actually being listened to.



posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: Vasa Croe




Oh...so agitate agitate agitate until someone hits you.....THEN jump on FB Live and post it....probably texted to every protester he bussed in.


Define agitate in this context.


Well...Floval talks about it multiple times in the first video then goes on to talk about "agitator training" in multiple cities around the country at about 8:50 min into the video, so feel free to watch it again and learn.



posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: LockNLoad
a reply to: kruphix

Fired, quit, stepped back... Doesn't matter 2 DNC promoters/helpers that have the appearance of impropriety are gone. I would think the DNC would be grateful to have them gone, to lessen any appearance of corruption and/or impropriety that people may infer from the videos.


Are you considered fired if you own a company that is doing work for many organizations, and you decide to stop doing work for one of them?



posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:30 PM
link   
a reply to: kruphix

He also confirms that the conversations in the videos where "hypothetical conversations", just as I supposed they were and that were confirmed in the latest video today. These conversations and "plans" were brought up and suggested by the fake donor put forth by O'Keefe.


"Hypothetical Conversations" are Code Words for Dems getting Caught Bragging about a Terrible Truth , and trying to BS their way out of it . Sorry , That Dog Don't Hunt...........



posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe




His company is likely done with the DNC for a while if not for good.


To address this point, you would have to understand the world of consulting.

Democracy Partners doesn't have to work with the DNC, they can consult for another consulting firm that is working for the DNC...and there is no connection with Democracy Partners and the DNC.

This happens all the time, across multiple industries.




top topics



 
79
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join