Originally posted by WestPoint23
I always though it was to fire the missiles. In my head Red button=Missiles being fired.
No, no, no. That's the Mig 31 Firefox you're thinking of!
I'd suggest the Saab Gripen would actually be better suited to the PAF's operational requirements as they share the "highway as emergency combat
strip" operatinal doctrine of the Swedes, while the Viggen would have been the best bet for India 20 years ago. A true multi-role aircraft designed
to defeat MiGs. Of course scale of economy means the Swedes don't build things cheap and the Yanks can.
From an outside perspective, the F/A18E/F is possibly a better bet than F16, given that Super Hornet's design cycle is younger than Fighting
Falcon's and is scheduled (as far as I know) to go longer than Fighting Falcon.
I suppose one plus to owning Fighting Falcon is that it's easy to provide an aggressor squadron that almost perfectly imitates your enemy!
Given that Canberras and Hunters are not built to mix it up with Falcons and nobody really builds dedicated bombers anymore (obvious exception: B2),
F/A 18 would seem to me to be a better choice over F16. Especially when you consider that the LCA is supposed to enter service and would slot straight
into the natural position of the F16, leaving the bigger Hornet to get really dirty moving the rubble sidways.