It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Now It All Makes Sense. Trump Doesn't Plan To Win. He's Launching A Media Empire.

page: 5
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in


posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 03:27 PM
a reply to: Greggers

What democracy?

Western Democracy died decades ago.

Only a shell to act as a cover remains.

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 03:29 PM
Case in point.

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 03:33 PM
This is absolutely true; it’s the buzz all over…with Roger Ailes as the boss of the new network which will be called the SPNN

Standing for :

Sexual Predator News Network

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 03:36 PM
This OP in particular is notorious for attack after shameless attack.

Always tabloid in nature, "rarely" (and I say rare as there are definitely exceptions) anything of substance.

But hey, I surmise on subject matter alone this thread as will be another 100+ flag gem. I wonder why ?!?!???????!???!??????

(Hint check the majority of topics being created in the "political mudpit" forum)


posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 03:37 PM
a reply to: Greggers

THANK you for your opinion I HAVE superior knowledge, forbidding the downfall of the country...

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 06:28 PM
That's just what the party of whining victims needs, another "news source".

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 06:40 PM
I always had a feeling he didn't really want to win. I was curious to know how far he would go and what he would do to get himself either disqualified or just drop out. I think he is controlled opposition for Hillary.

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 06:48 PM
Let's say he is a plant, and let's say despite all their attempts to use him as such to help get Hillary elected, it fails and Trump wins by a landslide of popular votes.

Do the electoral college ignore the landslide and put Hillary in anyway? If they don't, does Trump refuse the presidency? If he does win, and does accept, and he was a plant expected to lose, then what?

I mean they are trying really hard, but considering Brexit anything could happen...

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 07:18 PM
a reply to: theantediluvian

Whats happens when he wins and becomes president? Does this thread then turn to the fact Trump wanted a media empire while being president? I'll guess it does ...

As he will win.

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 07:20 PM
Do some of us get to say "I told you so!", now?

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 07:21 PM

originally posted by: olaru12

The largest voting demographic in America is women and they don't like it when you grab their privates just because you have a lot of money.

Interesting, before I got married and settled down with a great woman, the only shot I had at getting the "top" babes was by treating them like #. Strangely, if you don't you're not good enough, I.e lacking confidence.

Do I think it's right? No and I married to someone who isn't like that. That doesn't change the reality of my experience whether it "PC" or not.

Having two daughters myself, my concern is what and where do they get that from? School? Absent dad's? TV?

# if I know, I just try my best to encourage my little owns to have enough confidence on ther own. Fingers crossed.

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 07:23 PM
a reply to: theantediluvian

Been say'n it would be Hillary for eight years now.

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 07:55 PM
If Trump really wanted the Presidency; why is he pulling ads and money from the very key states he needs to win? Does that make sense?

Can't wait for the final debate!!

edit on 18-10-2016 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 10:15 PM

off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:27 PM

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: neo96
A billionaire oligarch named Ted Turner created CNN.

Another billionaire oligarch named Rupert Murdoch created FOX news in response to the rampant media bias of the time.

Another one percenter named All Gore created current tv until he sold it to a fossil fuel state in the middle east.

Who bloody cares if Trump does?

Hell he could call it TNN.

Beat me to it, lets not forget the news outlets that are infiltrated
and Pwoned by The Clintons and Obama, as proved with the DNC
and Podesta links.

CNN, Clinton News Network...

Most of the networks are owned by republican corporations, not liberals.



Fabian Socialist.

She's a neo con. Not a leftist AT ALL! Only American right wingers even think she is. Meanwhile, the rest of the world laughs..

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:31 PM
a reply to: theantediluvian

I'm glad for this, that there will be a counter-cultural voice against the establishment raging against the machine. That's a good thing, because it speaks truth to power and holds their feet to the fire, keeps them on their toes.

So long as it's rational, and not part of some sort of controlled opposition designed not to be taken seriously by the mainstream ie: when Alex Jones goes off on one of his incredible rants.

Maybe even 9/11 truth will break into the mainstream.

And I'm about as anti-Trump as you can get in terms of not wanting him to become POTUS.

The problem is for his supporters, if this was the plan all along, because they're not the type of people who like to be used and abused by people who are really just out for themselves and their own special interests..

I don't think that Trump is smart enough to pull it off to be honest with you, but I think it's a good idea Trump Media or whatever they end up calling it.

I wonder though if that investment bank told them to take a hike..?

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:42 PM

Everything being released point to Trump as a plant by the Clinton campaign... If true, is he in on it?

Trumps arrogance made him the perfect patsy for unknowingly taking the fall for the false left-right paradigm , and allowing mainstreet to vent . his candidacy started out as nothing more than a publicity stunt for the Trump brand, TPTB had the playboy dirt on him from the start , they just weren't expecting so much blowback.

Warning: propaganda piece paid for by numerous "Foundations"

edit on 19-10-2016 by Tellurian because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:45 PM
The key to understanding the next few weeks, to understanding dumb story after dumb story, dumb thread after dumb thread is this:

We are in the middle of the most expensive propaganda effort in the history of the world. It is to try to elect the otherwise unelectable Hillary Clinton, the most corrupt individual to ever get this close to the White House.

To that end, they are now desperately focused on decreasing Trump voter turnout by any means necessary. They will say anything and try pretty much anything. This thread is part of an effort to convince Trump voters that their vote doesn't matter. Whether paid or simply an amateur effort, this thread is on message and taking part in coordinated strategy.

If any of these dumb threads about how she is destined to win, or how Trump never wanted to win were true, etc etc, it wouldn't be the most expensive propaganda effort in history already. Her own campaign spending will come close to a billion dollars, and all the other spending (Super PACs and all sorts of unconventional spending these days...) are probably something like 1 to 2 billion dollars.

This election is looking more and more like Carter vs Reagan except of course that Jimmy was pretty boring and more or less squeaky clean, especially compared to Hillary. The media was lockstep in predicting a safe win for Jimmy and he got beat in a landslide.

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:48 PM
I just feel it when I watch him - Alex Jones is 1000% honest.
No corporate sponsers, no establishment funders, no corruption
at all.

He gets the most interesting and diverse people on to interview.
Haiti in particular - he's friends with that good billionaire who
for the past 7 years has flown weekly missions there to help
and feed the people who are dying.

Apparently the Clinton Foundation and the UN forces there have
been cheating and hurting the people, crapping in their water
supply, stealing 95% of charitable donations and withholding
food and aid to them after Matthew hit them and destroyed
parts of the island.

If the worse Trump did was talk dirty then what is the deal?
Clinton accomplished nothing as Secretary of State and as
First Lady, everyone knows it - she has nothing to run on
except attacks on her opponent.

Now who is going to the Oval Office? Not Hill as I see it.

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

edit on 18-10-2016 by Drawsoho because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 18 2016 @ 11:52 PM
if trump was trying to lose the election and was really just a patsy for Clinton, why is he then bringing the wikileaks revelations to his speeches? why is he calling Clinton out for being a corrupt and fraudulent liar?

If he was trying to lose, he's doing a good job of winning.

this thread like this assumption that he's throwing the election is batsh!t stupid.

<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in