posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 06:06 PM
On what is now the 9th dump of emails it has been revealed that no other than - you guessed it - John Podesta wished for the San Bernardino attacker
Syed Farook, instead be Christopher Hayes (who wrote the report he first found the identity of the attacker in).
Take from this what you will it at least shows that Podesta supports homegrown classic American shooters over those with Muslim backgrounds. Finally a
politician who supports true Americans eh?
The email chain began on Dec. 2, when digital operative Matt Ortega forwarded a tweet from MSNBC host Christopher Hayes that named one of the shooters
in the San Bernardino, Calif., attack as Sayeed Farook. Consultant Karen Finney forwarded the email to Podesta, commenting, “Damn.” Podesta
responded: “Better if a guy named Sayeed Farouk [sic] was reporting that a guy named Christopher Hayes was the shooter.”
Of course the media have sensationalised to the point
Podesta lamented that a Muslim, not a white man, named as killer in 2015 massacre
Note the use of 'white man' and not 'average american' or instead that 'reporter and attackers identities were reversed'.
This could be taken as a racial/ethnic/religious issue but I am unsure what to call it. Personally I think I just shows how politicians show their
true colours and agendas maybe there is some truth in Podesta wishing it to be a white man as this could support say an anti gun or increased
surveillance agenda yet Podesta didn't use those exact words so I will let ATS judge his meaning.
The biggest thing for me is that Podesta seems to say: 'Oh that's a shame it doesn't suit our agenda' instead of asking 'how they do this' or 'this is
terrible' it is very telling he jumps to the political implications.
edit on 16102016 by DodgyDawg because: Title change
on 16102016 by DodgyDawg because: Changed 'this could be taken as a racial...' from a weaker sentence