It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Donald Trump Openly Calls For Voter Intimidation

page: 4
120
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 10:56 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

Meh, no worries, antediluvian. His followers will all be there watching the voting November 28th.




posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 11:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Olivine

If he is sober in that it would be hilarious seeing him drunk.



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 11:43 PM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom

You can't change their minds. They make BS OP's and BS comments. They won't even bother reading it and understanding it themselves. They'll believe it means what they're told.



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 11:44 PM
link   
Trump calls for voting intimidation without calling for voter intimidation. It keeps getting better.



posted on Oct, 16 2016 @ 11:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Trump calls for voting intimidation without calling for voter intimidation. It keeps getting better.


The entire Republican party doesn't seem to understand what intimidation is.

Saying Trump or his supporters aren't intimidating is hilarious.

He literally threatens to throw Hillary in jail. That's not intimidation?

But no, you can turn individual circumstances on their head and make individual excuses for everything, the point is the party is metaphorically raining feces, not that each drop is small enough to ignore.



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 12:03 AM
link   
a reply to: imjack


He literally threatens to throw Hillary in jail. That's not intimidation?


Pay very close attention because I am getting sick of having to repeat myself.

He didn't say he was going to lock her up.

What he said was that if he was elected president he would instruct his attorney general (whom many believe will be Christie) to find a special prosecutor to look into her case.

Then later when Hillary responded, she said that it's a good thing that people like Donald Trump aren't in charge of the laws to which Trump interjected - because you would be in jail.


Stop spinning the facts.



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 12:07 AM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom

It's obvious I'm generalizing, can you answer the question, is that not intimidating?

You're a liar if you say no.



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 12:09 AM
link   
a reply to: imjack

Intimidating to Hillary? Yes.

Intimidating to the American voter? Not so much.

I think intimidating your opponent in a presidential debate is, if not one of the main objectives, certainly an advantageous byproduct.



edit on 10/17/2016 by ColdWisdom because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 12:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: imjack

Intimidating to Hillary? Yes.

Intimidating to the American voter? Not so much.

I think intimidating your opponent in a presidential debate is, if not one of the main objectives, certainly an advantageous byproduct.




Being intimidating isn't the point of a debate. That shows your character.

Similar to how I was saying Trump supporters use intimidation just like Trump, not that Trump intimidates voters.

Bunch of bullies that didn't get their way and will surely riot when it's over.



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 12:33 AM
link   
a reply to: imjack


Being intimidating isn't the point of a debate. That shows your character.


Hence the reason why I said it wasn't the point of a debate, just an added bonus. I mean you certainly wouldn't not want to intimidate your opponent. Right?


Bunch of bullies that didn't get their way and will surely riot when it's over.


Honestly, with the level of anxiety wrought within this country today, I'm expecting there to be riots no matter who wins. And you are naive if you disagree.

edit on 10/17/2016 by ColdWisdom because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 12:50 AM
link   
a reply to: imjack

Many acts of threat and violence have been perpetrated against Trump and his supporters, and now you call foul because someone said something. Someone tried to assassinate Donald Trump. His rally in Chicago was cancelled because mobs of people were outside rioting. People egged, spat on, punched, their property stolen and vandalized, all because of who they want to vote for.

Is that intimidation?



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 01:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

"Aware"?

LOL.




posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 01:19 AM
link   
Left or right if someone attempts to push around voters, I can beat their asses,and WILL.
I got a few DECADES to take out on some DESERVING soul.



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 01:21 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Am I drawing false equivalents? Endless deflection from a party with no ground.

The point is if you don't think Trump is bruiser and represents that, you're fooling yourself.



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 01:29 AM
link   
a reply to: imjack

It isn't deflection. You said the Republican Party doesn't understand intimidation. I was simply asking if what Trump supporters experienced was intimidation. If you want to convict people of future crimes, you will have to make a better case than quoting one or two supporters. On the other hand, one can easily point out the acts of violence that have already happened.



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 01:31 AM
link   
There have been acts of violence on both sides.

The lies about this need to stop.

Denying the obvious truth simply leads to post-fact hell.



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 01:32 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

Yeah. Trump (and his fanboys) are absolute nuts.

Hillary's going to kick his butt in the upcoming landslide.



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 03:57 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

They're trying to undermine people's confidence in the process. Make them stay home on election day.

This guy's a cheater. A nasty human being.

The one thing he didn't plan on is happening and his ego just can't take the hit.



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 04:01 AM
link   
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

Have they apprehended anyone in that yet?



posted on Oct, 17 2016 @ 05:31 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

Meh.

This is just Trump's standard modus operandi.

He's setting up the post-game board for when he loses:

"It was rigged! See I told you so! Rigged!!"





He'll get half the populace jumping up and down on their soapboxes screaming "Rigged! Rigged!"

And Trump will gleam in all his glory sipping on a single malt scotch wearing a Fozzie Bear smile as the masses still adore him because he "only lost due to a rigged election".

And he'll still be king, a king that didn't actually lose....

Praise be to his all-knowing orange glow.





top topics



 
120
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join