WTF Do These Wikileaks Numbers Mean?---BREAKING

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: IlluminatiTechnician

They'd still have to prove a link between her and his death though and you know that wouldn't be easy to do. All you'd ever have is speculation.

You sent it to the wrong person genius. I didn't write that post. It seems that you are the one speculating here.

originally posted by: goou111


Wow this sounds like Zoolander.

"If Assange was killed and Hillary still gets elected....... We deserve to be nuked by Russia."

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Hazardous1408

How it's done is a timer.

At a certain time like ever day a reset.

Rinse and repeat.

Not complicated at all.

So if he is alive he resets the timer?
That makes sense.

Thing is you cannot pre plan a tweet for a specific time.

So we're back to "How"?

Not to be mean...but you're looking at this as a user. A programmer uses an API that gives access to internal processes. Take a look at this TWITTER API DOC. It provides code methods for posting a tweet.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Regardless of where the clues point, if Assange is murdered, Hillary is done. Notice, I didn't say "her campaign" is done.

If he is murdered...She and Obama ordered it. To assume otherwise is ridiculous.

Gah, I hope people understood that was the gist of my crazy theory.

Totally understood, MME.

Is there anything that Kerry, UK FCO and Ecuador all have in common in the past at any point? Could there be 3 connected things somehow? I am confused on the Ecuador one unless the only reason Assange has been able to continue his stay in the embassy is that he has something HUGE on them and is using that to keep his asylum there. I mean they have really gone to bat for him not allowing anyone to take him.

a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

Yeah this ha been cleared up already, Awake.


#Assange hashtag on twitter is being deluged by bots sharing the same crappy "Pamela Anderson vegan meal" article likely as crowd control for all the "is he dead" comments.


There is also a post going round that he is being extradited as Ecuador caved and he has said he won't leave the embassy alive or he will suicide himself.
All speculation from someone with "diplomatic sources".

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Is there anything that Kerry, UK FCO and Ecuador all have in common in the past at any point? Could there be 3 connected things somehow? I am confused on the Ecuador one unless the only reason Assange has been able to continue his stay in the embassy is that he has something HUGE on them and is using that to keep his asylum there. I mean they have really gone to bat for him not allowing anyone to take him.

Kerry implicates Hillary AND Obama.
I believe the Kerry file shows how Hillary blackmailed Obama into making HER SOS..instead of Obama's original choice of Kerry.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

They're connected in the facts that all three deal with foreign policy.

John Kerry is the State Secretary,

Foreign and Commonwealth Office speaks for itself

and the Ecuadorian Embassy is self explanatory too, it's also where Assange took political asylum.

Anything other than that would be guesswork.

a reply to: IlluminatiTechnician

Jesus. Calm down. So I replied to the wrong person. Don't have a stroke about it.

Either way it doesn't change the content of my post anyway.

In case anyone hasn't seen this:



If this is true, then tomorrow's headlines might prove interesting.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
In case anyone hasn't seen this:

If this is true, then tomorrow's headlines might prove interesting.

Saw it.
I think it pays to be skeptical about that...Too much bravado.

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Kapriti

They can present a case based on circumstantial evidence all day long if they wish. But if you think that is going to be enough to convict anyone in office you're kidding yourself.

It happens, Here's just one case which also involved only circumstantial evidence to get a prosecution using the Espionage Act.

Regarding the whole of the Hillary issue, the circumstantial evidence is beyond overwhelming and if something happens to Assange then motive is clearly already present. That droning him talk doesn't look too good when you think about it either.

Here is the post;

www.twitter.com...

You'll have to view the picture to see what has been said.
The tweet itself is mundane, it's the picture of the 4chan(?) post that is interesting.

a reply to: mOjOm

They can present a case based on circumstantial evidence all day long if they wish. But if you think that is going to be enough to convict anyone in office you're kidding yourself.

Aside from a confession and hard evidence detailing exactly what happened nothing will come of it.

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
Thomas Jefferson

No one is talking about court cases.

The Second is both a Right and a Responsibility.

There are two Rs.

P

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
In case anyone hasn't seen this:

If this is true, then tomorrow's headlines might prove interesting.

I can see them now.

Nestled between several new donald trump rape victims coming forward. We will hear how Julian Assange voluntarily turned himself in and admitted the wikileaks docs were all fake and apologizes to clinton.

a reply to: Hazardous1408

See my previous post.

Think it's actually full-chan rather than half-chan.



Well, there sure is a lot of buzz across all the main social networks about this, and consequntly a lot of attention directed WikiLeaks direction.

I wonder what will become of this?

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Hazardous1408

See my previous post.

Think it's actually full-chan rather than half-chan.

 

Well, there sure is a lot of buzz across all the main social networks about this, and consequntly a lot of attention directed WikiLeaks direction.

I wonder what will become of this?

It feels like watching history playing out before us.

Wikileaks is replying to a few tweets, last one was 25 minutes ago

WikiLeaks Verified account
‏@wikileaks


WikiLeaks Retweeted
McClatchyDC ‏@McClatchyDC 25m25 minutes ago

New WikiLeaks emails show influence of Univision chairman in Clinton campaign www.mcclatchydc.com...=cpy …
ago. twitter.com...

2 hours ago replied here:

WikiLeaks Verified account
‏@wikileaks

@ianbremmer They have done it repeatedly and illegally to our journalistic staff and lawyers. https://__._/google-warrant/

twitter.com...

Tweet Wikileaks replied to :

Previous Tweet
Next Tweet
ian bremmer Verified account
‏@ianbremmer

White House response to Wikileaks should be hack of Julian Assange correspondence. That seems reasonable.
twitter.com...

So, has the White House made comments about hacking Julian Assange?

I'll go chase this down.....

originally posted by: IAMTAT

It feels like watching history playing out before us.

Technically, you're always watching history play out before you.

Any reports from of people turning up at the embassy? There should be an anon or two there by now right?

Anyone on here ever download the Wikileaks "Insurance" file? If so, anyone try any of these keys to open it yet?