WTF Do These Wikileaks Numbers Mean?---BREAKING

a reply to: cvsouth

originally posted by: Ohanka
a reply to: Tjoran

4 year old info i'm afraid.

Yup, sorry guy's

a reply to: IAMTAT

From your fingers, to the man upstairs! BESS not be suicide/child porn found, with suicide note....blahblahblah........They have to realize by now, WE ARE NOT STUPID! Well most of us, with our eyes open........

Only just noticed now the tweets with the keys have "Pre-commitment" before them, followed by the intended targets.

Wonder what Pre-commitment means.

I feel like I have to say this: Assange has to know, by now, that these rumors are swirling.

If he is alive and letting them swirl?

I already wonder if he is controlled opposition and a disinfo agent.

originally posted by: Ohanka
Only just noticed now the tweets with the keys have "Pre-commitment" before them, followed by the intended targets.

Wonder what Pre-commitment means.

en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: Tjoran

Oh, cool.

Well that answers that then.

Thank you

(3 years of university education sure paid off )

It's the golden age of truthing my friends! It's like the 12 days.of Christmas with scandalous information.

a reply to: Ohanka

From my 2nd post in the thread:

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: IAMTAT

From elsewhere on the web:

>What does "pre-commitment" mean?

>Precommitment is a strategy in which a party to a conflict uses a commitment device to strengthen its position by cutting off some of its options to make its threats more credible. Any party employing a Strategy of Deterrence faces the problem that retaliating against an attack may ultimately result in significant damage to their own side. If this damage is significant enough, then the opponent may take the view that such retaliation would be irrational, and therefore, that the threat lacks credibility, and hence, it ceases to be an effective deterrent. Precommitment improves the credibility of a threat, either by imposing significant penalties on the threatening party for not following through, or, by making it impossible to not respond.

en.m.wikipedia.org...

It's being said this could mean more files are indeed coming or this could be a warning that if pressure isn't taken off of WikiLeaks (possibly Assange directly) then something else will be released.

a reply to: Tjoran

Alternatively, in the context of the Cold War, fail-deadly retaliation systems such as the Soviet Dead Hand make a response to a sudden attack automatic, regardless of whether or not anyone is left alive to make decisions.

originally posted by: Ohanka
Only just noticed now the tweets with the keys have "Pre-commitment" before them, followed by the intended targets.

Wonder what Pre-commitment means.

I believe they mean these files are already in position with others..ready to be opened on command. The codes sent tonight are called 'Hash' and will be used to authenticate the files, when opened.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Regardless of where the clues point, if Assange is murdered, Hillary is done. Notice, I didn't say "her campaign" is done.

originally posted by: eNumbra

originally posted by: DodgyDawg
Kerry was the informant all along
>Assange received a tip that Kerry’s been outted
>All communications compromised
>Tweets an encrypted message for him
>”Cover blown, initiate safehouse protocol, they are coming for you”

^^^ 4chan's theory

Well, now I can't stop picturing John Kerry on the run, pulling some Jason Bourne moves, killing men with copies of Better Homes and Gardens.

Come on now...more likely he is disguised and walking around fairly normal. With Halloween around the corner and the need for a fast and easy disguise, maybe we should be looking for Frankenstein. I mean...it wouldn't take much make-up.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
I'm thinking these are 'validation' codes for pre-released files...to be opened by others should Assange be announced dead or extradited.
These have been released as leverage insurance against UK, US, Ecuador cooperating in extradition.

I agree and their new Tweet saying this

WikiLeaks ‏@wikileaks 2h2 hours ago @ianbremmer They have done it repeatedly and illegally to our journalistic staff and lawyers. https://__._/google-warrant/

Makes me think this is a cyber type war mongering before an actual full out Cyber-war.

Like... "leave my people alone or else"

Julian Assange escaped the CIA black ops death team by fleeing the embassy in a creepy clown costume. So many of those wandering the street at night these days the powers that be won't know who to stop.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Regardless of where the clues point, if Assange is murdered, Hillary is done. Notice, I didn't say "her campaign" is done.

If he is murdered...She and Obama ordered it. To assume otherwise is ridiculous.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Ohanka
Only just noticed now the tweets with the keys have "Pre-commitment" before them, followed by the intended targets.

Wonder what Pre-commitment means.

I believe they mean these files are already in position with others..ready to be opened on command. The codes sent tonight are called 'Hash' and will be used to authenticate the files, when opened.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.

You're implying an Insurance policy that's shared with certain key people in geographically diverse location? If so, that would be a good idea, in case Hillary-Obama cuts off his Internet Access...or worse.

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
If it was a dead mans switch who is tweeting???

Such a dead man's switch would be scripted to send out the tweet(s) automatically; Nobody would have to be doing it. I don't think that's what's happening, though.

How is that done then?

Enlighten me because unless his twitter account is hooked to his dying heart that's an impossibility.

It depends on how it is setup. But a simple explanation would be something with a log-in where you input a username and password. If you don't log in every 24 hours, a program is executed that runs the sending of the tweets, emails, etc. All the software would have to do is check the last date and time of login. If that date and time has exceed 24 hours...run the sends.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Regardless of where the clues point, if Assange is murdered, Hillary is done. Notice, I didn't say "her campaign" is done.

I was throwing out a completely wild theory. In my theory, info would have to flow incredibly fast so that it could work in Hillary's favor before the election.

I honestly wasn't being serious...But if Hillary could frame Trump & the Russians for framing her...

It was silliness...nothing more.

a reply to: Kapriti

They can present a case based on circumstantial evidence all day long if they wish. But if you think that is going to be enough to convict anyone in office you're kidding yourself.

Aside from a confession and hard evidence detailing exactly what happened nothing will come of it.

Also how the hell is Bob Beckel thrown in the mix??? I seriously doubt a fat old drunk is going to be a big player in an assassination against Assange. WTF are you talking about???

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Regardless of where the clues point, if Assange is murdered, Hillary is done. Notice, I didn't say "her campaign" is done.

If he is murdered...She and Obama ordered it. To assume otherwise is ridiculous.

Gah, I hope people understood that was the gist of my crazy theory.