It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Is The US Now At DEFCON 3?

page: 1
17
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 07:41 PM
link   
Seeing various instances of this emanating from the UK

Here's another one

I remember Operation Paul Bunyan and 9-11. Things were real. You could see loaded belt-fed weapons on armored vehicles if you looked.

Any first-hand sightings?




posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 07:46 PM
link   



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 07:47 PM
link   
I can't find any source to confirm this.

I've also talked to my former platoon sgt and he has not confirmed this either.

I'm guessing this isn't a thing right now.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 07:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Snarl




You could see loaded belt-fed weapons on armored vehicles if you looked.

Q: What good are loaded belt-fed weapons on armored vehicles in a nuclear war?

A: About the same as unloaded belt-fed weapons.

edit on 10/15/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 07:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Snarl

The UK will be keeping an eye on Russia's ONLY (haha) aircraft carrier as I sails through soon.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 07:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Defcon denotes defensive conditions.

There are certain procedures to be followed depending on the level. It isn't all about nuclear war.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 07:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

It's a tell.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 07:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Snarl

The UK will be keeping an eye on Russia's ONLY (haha) aircraft carrier as I sails through soon.


Maybe 1 Aircraft carrier, but the most concerning part is how many subs, bombers and nukes they posses(HA?)



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 08:00 PM
link   
a reply to: projectvxn
First link from the OP:
US citizens warned to prepare for NUCLEAR WAR over claims attack warning upgraded


Do you think a Russian invasion of the US mainland is feasible?
edit on 10/15/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 08:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Black_Fox

The only country I would be concerned of using a nuke would be North Korea. And I won't be concerned of that until they can turn their lights on at night. Probably a few decades.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 08:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: projectvxn
First link from the OP:
US citizens warned to prepare for NUCLEAR WAR over claims attack warning upgraded


Do you think a Russian invasion of the US mainland is feasible?


Mutual destruction my friend.. neither side will risk it..



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 08:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Black_Fox

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Snarl

The UK will be keeping an eye on Russia's ONLY (haha) aircraft carrier as I sails through soon.


Maybe 1 Aircraft carrier, but the most concerning part is how many subs, bombers and nukes they posses(HA?)

Just takes one sub.
Bombers, they might have. But it just takes one sub.
Nukes, on subs.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 08:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: projectvxn
First link from the OP:
US citizens warned to prepare for NUCLEAR WAR over claims attack warning upgraded


Do you think a Russian invasion of the US mainland is feasible?
seeing as that would take boats and planes, and both could be sank and shot down.... No.

Or... They hack, create chaos with our sirens and EAS, emp and then invade.

But I doubt it.


+1 more 
posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 08:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Misterlondon

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: projectvxn
First link from the OP:
US citizens warned to prepare for NUCLEAR WAR over claims attack warning upgraded


Do you think a Russian invasion of the US mainland is feasible?


Mutual destruction my friend.. neither side will risk it..

I grew up knowing that I may be vaporized at any time within the next 8 minutes.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 08:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I didn't even allude to that.

If this were a defcon 3 scenario, if I were still in, we'd mount guns on Hawks ready our MOPP4 gear, strap body armor on, and maybe even patrol the skies.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 08:08 PM
link   
a reply to: projectvxn




I didn't even allude to that.

Yeah. Well.
The OP did. Pretty much.
Going by the first link provided.


edit on 10/15/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 08:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Snarl


But conspiracy theorists have warned the threat has secretly been upgraded two levels to DEFCON 3 - meaning the US could mobilise troops in as little as 15 minutes.

Conspiracy theorists are the source , I'm no longer worried.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 08:16 PM
link   
a reply to: gortex



Conspiracy theorists are the source , I'm no longer worried.

I wouldn't go that far.
But I am less worried than I was 50 years ago.

edit on 10/15/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 08:18 PM
link   
defconwarningsystem.com...

There is a page or five for defcon



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 08:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Snarl


But conspiracy theorists have warned the threat has secretly been upgraded two levels to DEFCON 3 - meaning the US could mobilise troops in as little as 15 minutes.

Conspiracy theorists are the source , I'm no longer worried.


Exactly!!

I only trust the MSM, they vet any claim and only report on it if they have facts!

Oh, also, they make sure to report on all pertinent matters.

Everything else is just speculation.




top topics



 
17
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join