It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Bill Clintons Accusers Acted Immediately, Trumps Took Decades, Why ?

page: 2
36
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 09:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Greggers
Ummm... Bill Clinton's accusers did NOT act immediately. Were you alive in the 90s?



They probably saw the Clinton body count rising, and didn't want to be another "suspicious suicide"... those seem to follow the Clintons around...

Most politicians call and ask for money. The Clintons call and say "we know where you live"...
edit on 14-10-2016 by madmac5150 because: My ducks are assholes




posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 10:01 PM
link   
Because Trump's new accusers just prior to the election are fraudulent, slander and libel and should be charged with political interference.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 10:04 PM
link   
Not sure if CTR Brock's $5 MILLION BOUNTY had anything to do with it, but perhaps we could ask him how much of that bounty is left?




posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 10:07 PM
link   
Cousin of Zervos refuting assault claim.

here

It's apparent to many this is just fabricated BS but the slow learning lefties might catch on at some point.

On second thought, no they won't.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 10:08 PM
link   
Because Bill is a rapist scum and trump is just a regular old dirty old man



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 10:33 PM
link   
Many people here are pointing out that bill's accusers did not act immediately. Could that be because of hillary threatening them and the long long line of dead bodies behind the clintons? I would take my time and give it some serious thought before I opened my mouth too. Poor Monica had to open her mouth twice...



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 10:38 PM
link   
www.donaldjtrump.com...

Very interesting. He could just ignore it as there is no proof, but statements are good too!



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 10:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: MrSpad
Which Trump accusers? The ones whom he settle lawsuits with in the past? Or the ones that did not seek legal action and only told people close them only to hear Trump on tape bragging about doing it? Ha has been sued in the past and he is being sued now. Not everybody goes that route, they are often embarrassed and do not want to talk about it. Util that first person comes forward. This is very common in rape cases. People like Trump and Cosby get away with it because nobody wants to go public until somebody steps up then they it all comes out. This is not uncommon nor unusual.

If you're gonna make some false accusations at least source something ffs.

You're a MOD.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 11:40 PM
link   



From: albertpeia.com...

In 1972, a 22-year-old woman told campus police at Yale University that she was sexually assaulted by Clinton, a law student at the college. No charges were filed, but retired campus policemen contacted by Capitol Hill Blue confirmed the incident. The woman, tracked down by Capitol Hill Blue last week, confirmed the incident, but declined to discuss it further and would not give permission to use her name;

In 1974, a female student at the University of Arkansas complained that then-law school instructor Bill Clinton tried to prevent her from leaving his office during a conference. She said he groped her and forced his hand inside her blouse. She complained to her faculty advisor who confronted Clinton, but Clinton claimed the student ''came on'' to him.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 12:52 AM
link   
In a 1997 lawsuit against Trump, Jill Harth accused Trump of “attempted ‘rape.’


Filed in 1997


Billionaires with million dollar lawyers at their beck and call sure can make it hard for the plebs to get justice.

Look Trump has already bragged about the behavior he is accused of. Is this a case of Trumps unbelievability?



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 12:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: madmac5150


I wonder show much Hillary pays for a good sex abuse story?


Pretty sure that the dollar amount was 5 million.

Either from Correct The Record, or a yellow journalist site.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 01:01 AM
link   
I watched a documentary about Jimmy Savile and it had interviews with people who he abused and they were asked why they didn't come forward and the answers are the same here.
No one would believe them (going on ats this is true)
The accused has much power and influence.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 01:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Grimpachi
In a 1997 lawsuit against Trump, Jill Harth accused Trump of “attempted ‘rape.’


Filed in 1997


Billionaires with million dollar lawyers at their beck and call sure can make it hard for the plebs to get justice.

Look Trump has already bragged about the behavior he is accused of. Is this a case of Trumps unbelievability?


His ex wife also accused him of rape long before this election season.

It's not as though these allegations are out of character for this guy.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 01:05 AM
link   
a reply to: beeeyotch

To answer your question...

With Bill Clinton, the abuses really happened. Hence, immediately reported, due to the trauma.


With Donald Trump, the abuses did not happen. (Amazed at how hours are spent on quite literally "nothing")


It's no more complicated that that, beeeyotch.


edit on 10/15/2016 by carewemust because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 01:08 AM
link   
It's all a sham... These things never happened and they are being paid out of the clinton foundation

for the contribution to helping Grandma.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 01:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: beeeyotch

To answer your question...

With Bill Clinton, the abuses really happened. Hence, immediately reported, due to the trauma.


With Donald Trump, the abuses did not happen. (Amazed at how hours are spent on quite literally "nothing")


It's no more complicated that that, beeeyotch.



What are you talking about?

Jaunita Broaddrick waited 21 years.

Paula Jones waited 3 years.

Kathleen Willey waited 5 years.

Similar to the Trump accusers, they all came forward when the accused could suffer serious political consequences whether any charges stuck or not.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 02:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Greggers

I posted a link that showed a history of women all the way back to Bill's Yale days of complaining of his sexual assaults.

albertpeia.com...

With formal accusations against Bill Clinton at Yale and as governor of Arkansas, the left is obsessed with women's rights now? Especially with Hillary actively conspiring to intimidate Bill's victims? The hypocrisy of the Clintons knows no bounds. The outrage stems from continued use of women as political pawns by the Clintons for their convenience.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 02:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: WilburnRoach
a reply to: beeeyotch

Ask Cosby's victims, celebrities are like Gods in this country! Trump admitted he took full advantage of this!


This is exactly right.

More reason to move away from the celebrity worship and political religion that continues to enslave us.

Is there a Natural Rights party?



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 09:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
I watched a documentary about Jimmy Savile and it had interviews with people who he abused and they were asked why they didn't come forward and the answers are the same here.
No one would believe them (going on ats this is true)
The accused has much power and influence.


They have the right to speak their mind, Trump has the right to defend himself. We should hear them out. But we also are not supposed to assume guilt based on just words.

What is questionable is their timing. If they are telling the truth, why did they wait until *LESS THAN A MONTH* before the general election? Why didn't they come forward when Trump announced he was running for President in the first place? Why not after the first debate? Why not after Iowa or New Hampshire primaries? Why not after he started leading in delegate count? Why not when it was apparent that he was leading against anyone but Cruz? Why not when Cruz conceded?

It's not like Trump hasn't been in the news. It's not like there weren't prior accusations of inappropriate behavior towards women. There has been plenty of time to bring this news out in a meaningful way.

So I am left to believe this is entirely political, and doubt the stories of these women as fabrications and super-embellishments.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 10:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Grimpachi

That's civil litigation.

And was ALL about the benjamins.

They wrapped that up in a nice tidy bow of $25,501,000.

Not exactly credible in the least.




top topics



 
36
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join