BOMBSHELL: Hillary Sent Classified Intelligence Info to John Podesta's Hacked Email Account

originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: xuenchen

Except the FBI is in the bag for her too so nothing will happen.

Meanwhile if a private charges his mp3 player on a SIPR computer he gets an article 15 or ends up in prison.

Yup.

originally posted by: LifeMode

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: projectvxn

I read the email.

Nothing in it says it's classified.


In fact it's a pretty boring email with nothing written that you wouldn't expect from a well educated ATSer discussing the geopolitics of the Middle East & North Africa.




But if you can quote what you'd find to be deemed "classified" from the email go ahead.


I'm all ears.

They already found this stuff on her server. Higher than top secret. WTF are you talking about. Congress could not even look at it.

Are you talking about this specific email?

If not you can

a reply to: Hazardous1408

It's an operational discussion.

Let me know how much time you've spent having operational discussions outside of SIPR or higher networks.

I'd be in jail for that.

It didn't need to be answered. The fact that such a question was even asked over a non secured system is illegal as hell.

a reply to: xuenchen

Do you ever, ever get tired of this topic?

It hasn't gone anywhere yet... What makes anyone think it will?

Hackers and Leakers alike have been promising the "Final smoking gun" every week for months now...

Yet Hillary is likely the winner in a month...

Let's find our own solutions, as a people.

Convention of States is promising.

originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Hazardous1408

It's an operational discussion.

Let me know how much time you've spent having operational discussions outside of SIPR or higher networks.

I'd be in jail for that.

It didn't need to be answered. The fact that such a question was even asked over a non secured system is illegal as hell.

How so?

Please enlighten me.

Don't give me this appeal to authority bollocks just answer the question how can Hillary asking Podesta that question be classified or illegal???

& why the f*ck would she be asking him that anyways?
Did he have clearance?
She didn't cos she had been out of a job for 2 years.


So yeah, enlighten me.

a reply to: Hazardous1408

You don't sent operational discussions to gmail accounts.

ALL operational discussions MUST BE, by federal law, sent over secured networks SIPR or above.

No exceptions.

Gmail isn't part of the SIPR network. It isn't JWICS, hell it doesn't even have the security of NIPR.

YOU keep saying things like this:

It would be classified, yes. If the question had been answered. It wasn't. There is no response to that question, so how can asking a question be classified?

So I ask again, how much experience do you have with classified networks to say something like this? It might be an appeal to authority, but it is a legitimate one. Since you have NO CLUE what you're talking about.

Fear not, freedom fighters.

One way or another, here's how things are going to play out:

1) Trump will lose the election
2) The case against Hillary will be in full swing before she even takes office
3) After she is sworn in, impeachment proceedings will begin
4) Trump will be making hundreds of millions of dollars a year shilling books and other forms of media to the Breitbart crowd, steadily increasing the volume of the "lock her up" chants across the country
5) Bill will bang a hooker or two.
6) Nothing will happen in Washington for 4 years

a reply to: projectvxn

Yes you keep saying that, and I'm asking you how a query by HRC to Podesta, neither of which have clearance, is classified "operational discussion"???

I like the emails about Obamas coc aine abuse and muslim stuff lol,,,these emails aren't boring at all,,,I WANT MORE EMAILS !!!!! best reads ever,,pure Hillary Hypocracy

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: projectvxn

Yes you keep saying that, and I'm asking you how a query by HRC to Podesta, neither of which have clearance, is classified "operational discussion"???

Thank you for demonstrating how much you know about security clearances.

I've been out of the Army 10 months and still have an obligation to maintain the classified information I have secret.

originally posted by: Greggers
Fear not, freedom fighters.

One way or another, here's how things are going to play out:

1) Trump will lose the election
2) The case against Hillary will be in full swing before she even takes office
3) After she is sworn in, impeachment proceedings will begin
4) Trump will be making hundreds of millions of dollars a year shilling books and other forms of media to the Breitbart crowd, steadily increasing the volume of the "lock her up" chants across the country
5) Bill will bang a hooker or two.
6) Nothing will happen in Washington for 4 years

You forgot to mention Hillary might be found in Contempt of Congress before the election.

Wait for it.

originally posted by: projectvxn

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: projectvxn

Yes you keep saying that, and I'm asking you how a query by HRC to Podesta, neither of which have clearance, is classified "operational discussion"???

Thank you for demonstrating how much you know about security clearances.

I've been out of the Army 10 months and still have an obligation to maintain the classified information I have secret.

Your attitude stinks to be honest.

All I've done is ask questions.


How is a query between two people without clearance "classified operational discussion"???

a reply to: Greggers

6) Nothing will happen in Washington for 4 years

I've been begging for nothing to happen in Washington since Bush was in office.

a reply to: Hazardous1408

How is a query between two people without clearance "classified operational discussion"???

I already explained it to you but you keep rejecting the answer.

I don't give two #s what you think about my attitude.

originally posted by: Teikiatsu
But did the emails talk about groping women? That's what is important!

Actually...

Wikileaks: Democrats prepared fake Trump "grope under the meeting table" Craigslist employment advertisement in May 2016

a reply to: projectvxn

No you haven't explained how asking a question is "operational discussion".

I've rejected nothing and already took your word on page one for your second excerpt.


I don't care about what you think about my opinions of your attitude, I'm still gonna tell you.

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

How is a query between two people without clearance "classified operational discussion"???

You're still not getting it.

Hillary had access to current classified info at the time she sent the info to Podesta.

The "discussion" they had involved classified info at the time in 2014.

She was Secretary of State for 4 years and had plenty of contacts.

And the Clinton Foundation was active in ME issues for big money.

Not to mention the run for President was already in progress.

a reply to: Hazardous1408

See xuenchen's post above..

How can anyone be so dense?

originally posted by: gladtobehere
a reply to: xuenchen

Who cares?

I know. Really.
I mean, I just saved $50 a month on my car insurance. And it only took 15 minutes!
Good times! Keep em comin!

The article failed to point to the "Classified" info that was passed on in the email. The actual email seems to be nothing more then what someone very knowledgeable with foreign policy in the region should know such as former Secretary of State that has kept an eye on the region since leaving the position and has a future presidential run coming where this would be a hot topic.