It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Frenzied Donald Trump Fans Are Turning on the Media -- And It's Getting Scary

page: 17
97
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 11:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66


No, nothing in the Wikileaks garbage has proven that the Clinton campaign is "colluding" with anyone, least of all the corporate media.


Oh, I don't know about that.




posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 11:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Teikiatsu

Ah well, if not coffee, perhaps fresh air to wake you up.

You didn't "point out" anything of the sort. You made a silly, out of place analogy about my signature with nothing to back it up ... LITERALLY trying to put words in my mouth that I didn't say.

Make an argument with evidence.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 11:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Teikiatsu

Ah well, if not coffee, perhaps fresh air to wake you up.

You didn't "point out" anything of the sort. You made a silly, out of place analogy about my signature with nothing to back it up ... LITERALLY trying to put words in my mouth that I didn't say.

Make an argument with evidence.


So you won't provide a citation or retract your statement?



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 11:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Teikiatsu

Ah well, if not coffee, perhaps fresh air to wake you up.

You didn't "point out" anything of the sort. You made a silly, out of place analogy about my signature with nothing to back it up ... LITERALLY trying to put words in my mouth that I didn't say.

Make an argument with evidence.


So you won't provide a citation or retract your statement?


You mean the question I asked?



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 11:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: BeefNoMeat

originally posted by: yuppa
I got a idea. the media likes reporting and creating violence so much they are finally going to get it back in spades.
I suspect if the elections close Trump supporters might just go and start a uprising if trump demands blood.


So your idea is that after Trump loses on Nov 8th his supporters should start a violent uprising? Some really critical thought, there. Lemme know when you decide to pick up the pitchfork...that intimated uprising won't work out well for you. Not all.


I'M NOT A SUPPORTER. I support STATES and senate and congress alone running the country in truth. I hate BOTH canidates but i hate Hills more.

I didnt SAy I would support a violent uprising i was STATING what MIGHT HAPPEN. SO please stop puting words in my mouth.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 12:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
a reply to: Gryphon66

Media Lives Matter?



Not really



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 01:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Teikiatsu

Ah well, if not coffee, perhaps fresh air to wake you up.

You didn't "point out" anything of the sort. You made a silly, out of place analogy about my signature with nothing to back it up ... LITERALLY trying to put words in my mouth that I didn't say.

Make an argument with evidence.


So you won't provide a citation or retract your statement?


You mean the question I asked?



No. A citation to the statement you wove into your question.

EDIT: "Or do you, like Mr. Trump, approve of trashing the First Amendment?"

In this question you are trying to create a trap. Whether or not the person agrees or disagrees, you will infer that they agree that Trump approves of trashing the First Amendment. I reject your premise, and would like you to provide a citation or retract the statement and change your question to "Do you approve of trashing the First Amendment?"

Since you are weaving and bobbing I can only assume you have no such proof of Mr. Trump's plans for the First Amendment but will not take back your incorrect statement.

Fair enough, but I can continue to point out that you made an incorrect statement until you prove otherwise.
edit on 15-10-2016 by Teikiatsu because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 01:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

So, how would any of that change under a Trump Presidency?

In your opinion?

I'm not suggesting it would change under a Trump presidency. I am suggesting that the people use their influence to end it though. Don't watch bias based news...turn it off, don't buy it and don't read it. I would love to see a basically computer generated news paper or show that simply spit out facts and no opinions. I would watch that and I would formulate my own opinions. Sure...I may tune into something that is opinion based but I would do so knowingly.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 01:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: BeefNoMeat

originally posted by: yuppa
I got a idea. the media likes reporting and creating violence so much they are finally going to get it back in spades.
I suspect if the elections close Trump supporters might just go and start a uprising if trump demands blood.


So your idea is that after Trump loses on Nov 8th his supporters should start a violent uprising? Some really critical thought, there. Lemme know when you decide to pick up the pitchfork...that intimated uprising won't work out well for you. Not all.


I'M NOT A SUPPORTER. I support STATES and senate and congress alone running the country in truth. I hate BOTH canidates but i hate Hills more.

I didnt SAy I would support a violent uprising i was STATING what MIGHT HAPPEN. SO please stop puting words in my mouth.

I would support an uprising...just not violent. I think and hope that if Trump doesn't win, that he starts an organization to promote American values and morals. I hope he uses his popularity and money to continue the movement of Americans that are sick of the crap and want real leaders instead of selfish money grabbers who are more than happy to sell the country and the people out to the best financial interest for them.

I can easily see Donald Trump doing this. He doesn't like to lose and doesn't give up. If he starts an organization on the lines of the NRA...with the goal of fixing what has been damaged in our country, he would have a ton of members all working toward the same goal. To make America great again.
edit on 10/15/2016 by WeAreAWAKE because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 01:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: CrapAsUsual

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
a reply to: Gryphon66

Media Lives Matter?



Not really


Yes, really. What part of that do you fail to understand?



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 01:43 PM
link   
Once Trump loses you won't see him again in politics. He's made his money, he's conned certain types of people, preyed on the paranoid, deep-down racist and uneducated. He's exploited them, made a profit from his campaign and he's done.

Biggest con for a long while, can't believe so many have fallen for it. They are the same ones who will protest after its over.

You watch, Trump will lose, back-track on everything and support Clinton in her Presidency.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 01:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: liammc

Trump is an idiot and Hillary is a snake, neither should be anywhere near the POTUS job, yet both have unconditional support from the American people.

I'm from the UK so I don't support either, but at the moment I am both amused and worried at how stupid the American people have become, you treat the biggest election in the world like it's a reality TV show.


Some of us know our issues and the supreme court is a huge looming issue in this country. Let me break it down for you:

Clinton = 2nd Amendment restrictions with liberal judges appointed.

Trump = 2nd Amendment untouched with conservative judges appointed.

And that's just one of many potential issues with the Supreme Court if Hillary is (s)elected.

Now don't be trying to tell us how stupid we've become when there's so much at stake to loose.

They won't be able to take our guns away like they did in the UK.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 01:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Im most concerned at how much of a pro hillary is at using the media to spread misinformation and sway the public opinion. she's a pro a true politician

90% of the media is anti trump and the majority of the public is gonna eat any negative story up as truth witout the need for facts. can you imagine what happens when she's president?

I'm pissed and I don't even support trump.
edit on 15-10-2016 by JDmOKI because: (no reason given)

edit on 15-10-2016 by JDmOKI because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 02:35 PM
link   
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

I agree and would love to see a daily "fact sheet" on topics of my choosing.

However, there's no money in that. There is in sensationalism and tabloidism.

I agree with voting with our pocketbooks as well.

Is this a sign of the apocalypse?



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 02:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: JDmOKI
a reply to: Gryphon66

Im most concerned at how much of a pro hillary is at using the media to spread misinformation and sway the public opinion. she's a pro a true politician

90% of the media is anti trump and the majority of the public is gonna eat any negative story up as truth witout the need for facts. can you imagine what happens when she's president?

I'm pissed and I don't even support trump.


I agree with you about Hillary. She is a professional politician.

Trump has given the media plenty of ammunition. Are you saying that what they're reporting isn't true?



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 02:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66


Frenzied Donald Trump Fans are Turning on the Media - HuffPo

Now, I know that some of you will be content to attempt to discredit the source (The Huffington Post) and rattle off that the scary leftist gangs are more violent than any Trump supporter ever thought about being ... but what should trouble ALL OF US ... are the emotions that are being played upon by the Trump Campaign which ARE NOT GOING AWAY when he loses in November.

The article contains first-hand accounts of media personnel who were at the rally to do their jobs, to wit, cover the campaign of DJT. They had to be escorted out by SECURITY after being threatened, spat upon, screamed at, etc. FOR DOING THEIR JOB AND HOLDING UP THE FIRST AMENDMENT!!!

Look at that lady, up above ... do you think that's going to fade away in November?

... and there are thousands like her, who are now buying into Trump's new crucified Messiah pitch.

We've got trouble friends, right here in America.



Trump is nothing more than people waking up to a failed system, that's totally rigged in "Their" favor. IF you vote Trump you're an idiot, if you vote Hillary you're a double idiot.

Hillary has done nothing but proven the sentiment that the game is rigged to anyone with half a brain, and people are starting to get pissed that nothing is changing and criminals are not getting rightfully charged.

Right off the bat, after I saw Trump bring up good 'ol Bill's embarrassments, and saw all these new accusations about Trump it was painfully obvious what was going on. It's actually comical, and anyone who can't see it shouldn't be allowed to vote.

If Hillary wins things might get really bad in this country. People aren't going to go for war with Russia, and people aren't going to go for Business as Usual. Frankly it's absurd the Election Drama has gone on this long, and corruption has been so blatantly apparent, there hasn't been a revolt yet. This system won't survive for much longer, and people are starting to wake up to that scary thought.

But what difference does it make?
edit on fSaturdayAmerica/Chicago4202699 by Flesh699 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 02:40 PM
link   
Why not?

Autocrats, dictators, and fascists always go after the intellectuals, teachers, and journalists first.

That way there is no one left to police their nonsense or call them on their BS.

People who are pro 2nd but anti-1st amendment are trash.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 02:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Flesh699

I don't disagree that it's going to get "bad" in this country before it gets better.

I do disagree with you about voting. Voting is a basic American right. There are many forces that are trying hard to convince us that we are completely powerless. As long as we stick to our reason and look for the truth, we have a chance.

I encourage everyone to vote their conscience, although, admittedly, there are choices I couldn't understand.

The utter reality denial on display in the OP? That's not our friend, that's our enemy.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 02:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Teikiatsu

Ah well, if not coffee, perhaps fresh air to wake you up.

You didn't "point out" anything of the sort. You made a silly, out of place analogy about my signature with nothing to back it up ... LITERALLY trying to put words in my mouth that I didn't say.

Make an argument with evidence.


So you won't provide a citation or retract your statement?


They're not being paid to debate it, just dismiss it. This thread will just go around in circles for the next hundred pages if you're expecting that.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 02:42 PM
link   
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE




I would support an uprising...just not violent. I think and hope that if Trump doesn't win, that he starts an organization to promote American values and morals


And just how in the sam hell is he going to justify doing something like that with everything that is come out against him? EVEN HIS OWN WORDS?!

LoL he has no leg to stand on for a movement like that, nor should he be the Flag Ship for anything as such...

The man is about as devoid of morality as you can get......
edit on 10/15/2016 by ManBehindTheMask because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
97
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join