It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: poncho1982
To pretend that the media is innocent, and are actually doing their job is laughable.
The media should be independent of party affiliation, and the moment they become biased, they are nothing more than a parody of themselves.
PuppyLove is right, they haven't been true to that in a very long time.
The OP is a clear indication that our political dialogue in this country is in shambles and some are resorting to violence and the threat of violence to get their unhinged points across. Some of you have conveniently forgotten that there is now a "right-wing" MSM as well ... just as corrupt, just as serving of their masters' interests, and far, far more biased and dishonest about reporting the actual facts.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Gryphon66
It's not a matter of "respecting" the media, it's a matter of not threatening them openly, spitting at them, shouting in their faces, leaving swastikas on the press table, etc. etc.
Wait you mean they're being treated like they've treated the American right for years?
Treat others the way you want to be treated ... It seems the media might finally be getting what they kept claiming they wanted. Now they're whining about it and so are you?
Crocodile tears I think, and it's no less than you've been warned about. You can only kick a dog for so long before it will bite.
LOL ... such compassion.
So, it's to be "eye for an eye" then?
Spoken like a true zealot.
I'm against political violence, whatever the source.
originally posted by: liammc
What's scary is that everyone knows that the MSM is corrupt to #, but half of America don't care because it's their candidate that they are supporting.
Problem isn't the corruption, problem is the idiots who allow it.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Teikiatsu
People have a right to free expression.
The 1st prohibits government from censorship.
But government does censor by using private agencies by proxy.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: poncho1982
The members of the media deserve to be threatened? How banana Republican of you!
Or do you, like Mr. Trump, approve of trashing the First Amendment?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: Gryphon66
The rampant right-wing attacks on Clinton merely serve as a smoke-screen for the real crimes that she and others in her tier commit.
And what would those be? This ought to be good...
Figure it out.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
But government does censor by using private agencies by proxy.
If that can be proven that government entities are doing that, it needs to be brought out into the open and stopped. But from what I have seen it's the leftist dinosaur media willingly and voluntarily assisting the Democratic party.
originally posted by: gernblan
Did anybody actually watch the video? The violence in the video is being caused by anti Trump supporters! Meaning the Hillary camp. It states as much over and over and over in the video. Just kind of shows you the intelligence level of what we're dealing with. Epic fail!
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: Gryphon66
The rampant right-wing attacks on Clinton merely serve as a smoke-screen for the real crimes that she and others in her tier commit.
And what would those be? This ought to be good...
Figure it out.
The problem, of course, is that the alt-right thinks every attack of the left is legitimate, even though a large percentage of it is not, as any independently thinking person can attest after reviewing the facts.
Anyone who acts like they don't know what stories account for the smoke screen has already swallowed the poison.
In part, they can blame themselves for the egregious things Clinton gets away with.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: Gryphon66
The rampant right-wing attacks on Clinton merely serve as a smoke-screen for the real crimes that she and others in her tier commit.
And what would those be? This ought to be good...
Figure it out.
The problem, of course, is that the alt-right thinks every attack of the left is legitimate, even though a large percentage of it is not, as any independently thinking person can attest after reviewing the facts.
Anyone who acts like they don't know what stories account for the smoke screen has already swallowed the poison.
In part, they can blame themselves for the egregious things Clinton gets away with.
We have made the same argument.
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Greggers
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: Gryphon66
The rampant right-wing attacks on Clinton merely serve as a smoke-screen for the real crimes that she and others in her tier commit.
And what would those be? This ought to be good...
Figure it out.
The problem, of course, is that the alt-right thinks every attack of the left is legitimate, even though a large percentage of it is not, as any independently thinking person can attest after reviewing the facts.
Anyone who acts like they don't know what stories account for the smoke screen has already swallowed the poison.
In part, they can blame themselves for the egregious things Clinton gets away with.
We have made the same argument.
I know.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Teikiatsu
You haven't been keeping up with the Wikileaks? The Clinton campaign has been colluding with the press and the press with them to craft their message. They were also working together back when Hillary was at State.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Teikiatsu
So you're going to accuse me of doing what you're now doing?
LOL.
Have a cup of coffee.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
Or do you, like Mr. Trump, approve of trashing the First Amendment?
Citation, or retract that assertion please.
Are you familiar with English punctuation?
I'm asking a question, not making a statement/assertion.