It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

New Trump Accuser Surfaces - Says Donald Grabbed Her Under Skirt

page: 5
33
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: neo96
Did this one work for the Clinton Foundation like one of the others ?

Inquiring minds want to know.


Better yet, is she lying because she was bought by Clinton, like the others.


Can you provide the evidence that these women have been bought?



Probably as much evidence of the accusations they have presented.


Is there evidence or not? If the claim is going to be made, let's see the proof.


Indeed, let's see the proof of the claim being made that she was assaulted. What are we gonna do, sit on our thumbs and not look for evidence that Trump assaulted her (just believe it and run with it for a couple more weeks) until the election is over? Afterwards, it'll never be heard of again. Guaranteed.




posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: introvert

I wasn't supporting either notion. Just pointing our this whole thing is speculation.


The comment I was replying to was not speculation. It was an absolute statement. Here is what was said.



Better yet, is she lying because she was bought by Clinton, like the others.


I'll provide a link that it's pure BS when you provide a link that it happened. Deal?



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:58 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

You're referring to the hand on the waist, just like Trump's near Hillary's breast?


edit on 14-10-2016 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 03:00 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

Seems as though The Don grabbed your underskirt too..




posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 03:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: neo96
Did this one work for the Clinton Foundation like one of the others ?

Inquiring minds want to know.


Better yet, is she lying because she was bought by Clinton, like the others.


Can you provide the evidence that these women have been bought?



Oh so now yall want 'evidence'.

where is the 'evidence' about what Trump supposedly did?

Bout the only thing Trump critics has is half baked hearsay.



Funny how that works, isn't it...



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 03:02 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

I was referring to Bill trying to grope Trumps wife in front of his own.

And SHE put a stop to it with her own.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 03:04 PM
link   
a reply to: LSU0408

Rules for radicals isn't very funny.

Flat out cess pool politics.

Everything they say about Trump comes straight from the playbook.

Amazing how they didn't stray one iota from it.

en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 03:05 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

That kool aid really has a kick, huh?

Maybe they are holding hands just out of sight. Nudge and wink.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 03:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: neo96
Did this one work for the Clinton Foundation like one of the others ?

Inquiring minds want to know.


Better yet, is she lying because she was bought by Clinton, like the others.


Can you provide the evidence that these women have been bought?


Didn't you know? Rampant speculation is admissible evidence these days.
edit on 14-10-2016 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 03:08 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik




That kool aid really has a kick, huh


For some people namely Trump critics that are glossing over the fact they were besties before the general election.,

And now demagogues Trump.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 03:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: neo96
Did this one work for the Clinton Foundation like one of the others ?

Inquiring minds want to know.


Better yet, is she lying because she was bought by Clinton, like the others.


Can you provide the evidence that these women have been bought?


Didn't you know? Rampant speculation is admissible evidence these days.


That was obvious for Trump critics that couldn't read a tax return from 1995.

'evidence' not needed.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 03:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: manuelram16

What does that have anything to do with what I posted? My point was that Trump and his supporters are hypocrites for using Juanita Broadrrick as an attack on Bill Clinton but at the same time claiming Jessica Leeds is a list because it took her so long to come forward with her story.

So you disagree that Trump and his supporters are being hypocritical in this instance?


Braoddrick accused Bill back in 1999. We have women coming out this week claiming Trump assaulted them. Do you not see the coincidence of that, 3 weeks before the election, 1 week after he said he grabs pussies? The Clinton accusers came out in the 90's. I feel Braoddrick could have easily been intimidated into silence, but I find it tougher to believe her for waiting 21 years to say anything. However, what damage would it have done? His term was pretty much over.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 03:11 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

I see Trump supporters glossing over that fact even more.

Not sure what that has to do with your interpretation of the hand positions in that picture.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 03:11 PM
link   
a reply to: desert

Yeah, I'll bet she's not a Clinton supporter.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 03:13 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

I don't know what you are talking about outside of your normal "belittle left wing supporters as often as possible in your posts" rhetoric. It's not like Trump has denied any of the things pointed out and exposed in those tax returns or anything. Hell he practically endorsed it when he described the tax write-off as "being smart". But hey, not surprised really. I rarely ever understand your red herrings/strawmen.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 03:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: neo96
Did this one work for the Clinton Foundation like one of the others ?

Inquiring minds want to know.


Better yet, is she lying because she was bought by Clinton, like the others.


Can you provide the evidence that these women have been bought?


Didn't you know? Rampant speculation is admissible evidence these days.


That was obvious for Trump critics that couldn't read a tax return from 1995.

'evidence' not needed.


Even 'funny'.

That no one is even talking about anymore much like no one will be talking about these 'accusers' in a week.

Still waiting on that tax return 'evidence'.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 03:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: LSU0408

Rules for radicals isn't very funny.

Flat out cess pool politics.

Everything they say about Trump comes straight from the playbook.

Amazing how they didn't stray one iota from it.

en.wikipedia.org...


Nor will they stray. They're incapable of independent thought.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 03:16 PM
link   
I'm glad that neo is finally back, I missed reading his posts, as he always had the patience and the willpower to enter discussion with gossip girls of ATS...

Another day, and another tabloid article on ATS, by the same member



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 03:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Yeah well there K.

That tax return was a red herring.

These accusers are strawmans.

But hey WHO CARES.

Right.




I don't know what you are talking about outside of your normal "belittle left wing supporters as often as possible in your posts" rhetoric


My 'rhetoric' has more substance in it than Trump critics running around belittling Trump calling him every name in the book because all they have is strawmans because for whatever reason they can't discuss the guys actual positions.
edit on 14-10-2016 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 03:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: neo96
Did this one work for the Clinton Foundation like one of the others ?

Inquiring minds want to know.


Better yet, is she lying because she was bought by Clinton, like the others.


Can you provide the evidence that these women have been bought?


Didn't you know? Rampant speculation is admissible evidence these days.


Says the guy pushing the claim that Trump is a sexual predator that gropes women, and has no evidence of such.



new topics

top topics



 
33
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join