It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

New Trump Accuser Surfaces - Says Donald Grabbed Her Under Skirt

page: 4
33
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

There's a candidate that is either citing alt-right bloggers' dimwitted twitter musings or Russian propaganda as "truth." You want to talk about "tabloid gossip journalism?"

"Where was your outrage" then?


Using the term "alt-right" carries as much fabricated outrage as the term "racist" and deducts credibility to character.




posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: introvert

I wasn't supporting either notion. Just pointing our this whole thing is speculation.


The comment I was replying to was not speculation. It was an absolute statement. Here is what was said.



Better yet, is she lying because she was bought by Clinton, like the others.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: tribal




do you know how easy it is to fabricate something? I know people with false identities......they have whole lives built upon complete falsehood.


Trump is on record bragging about doing those things.

Are you calling Trump a liar? Maybe you are talking about Trump and his admitted false identities.


No, he bragged about being able to do it if you're a star.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Please do quote me, link in my threads where I've been ranting & raving about Bill.

"Infidelities"? Is that what you call this

Um no... I didn't directly reply to you so clearly I wasn't directly talking to you. Check you ego.


Since I'm the one using the "tabloid gossip rag" terminology herein, my whole power rant this week, it seemed pretty obvious you were talking to me.

Check. I'll check my ego, and my privilege, just for you.

edit on 14-10-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:19 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Anyone can say anything, without proof it's speculation or opinion. Welcome to 2016 elections, luckily they took out the you decide and now it's just decided.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grimpachi

originally posted by: carewemust
Any legal actions taken yet? Without legal actions these are just women looking to make a quick Buck off of a billionaire.


That is almost exactly what Trump has said about the women that accused him of such things back before there was a recording of him bragging about doing those exact things.


So we take their word for it and say he's guilty as charged? Is this what you want to do now with such allegations?



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: neo96
Did this one work for the Clinton Foundation like one of the others ?

Inquiring minds want to know.


Better yet, is she lying because she was bought by Clinton, like the others.


Can you provide the evidence that these women have been bought?



Oh so now yall want 'evidence'.

where is the 'evidence' about what Trump supposedly did?

Bout the only thing Trump critics has is half baked hearsay.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:29 PM
link   
a reply to: manuelram16

What does that have anything to do with what I posted? My point was that Trump and his supporters are hypocrites for using Juanita Broadrrick as an attack on Bill Clinton but at the same time claiming Jessica Leeds is a list because it took her so long to come forward with her story.

So you disagree that Trump and his supporters are being hypocritical in this instance?



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Actually NO Trump critics aren't.

Because Bills exploits happened during his PRESIDENCY, and wifey knew all about it.

Hell they even say Chelsea is not even Bills.

Anyhow.

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE ?



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: introvert

Anyone can say anything, without proof it's speculation or opinion. Welcome to 2016 elections, luckily they took out the you decide and now it's just decided.


Exactly. Opinion that is trying to be passed-off as fact.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:40 PM
link   
From the OP source


Anderson said that she was particularly disturbed by the way the video caught Trump and Bush, who were aboard a bus, crudely discussing Arianne Zucker, an actress they spotted waiting to escort them onto a soap-opera set. Bush has since been suspended from his subsequent job as co-host of NBC’s “Today” show, and the network is reportedly negotiating his departure.

“I watched this woman — who could have been me; it could have been anyone — walk in and shake his hand,” Anderson said. “That was just nauseating, because she has no idea what she was walking into, and what could possibly happen to her. And that’s just wrong.”

As Anderson agonized over whether to tell her story publicly, the New York Times reported the accounts of two women who said that Trump had groped them, and a People magazine reporter wrote a first-person story claiming that in December 2005 Trump pushed her against a wall and began “forcing his tongue down my throat.”

That decided it for Anderson.

“It’s a sexual assault issue, and it’s something that I’ve kept quiet on my own,” Anderson said. “And I’ve always kept quiet. And why should I keep quiet? Actually, all of the women should speak up, and if you’re touched inappropriately, tell somebody and speak up about it. Actually go to the authorities and press some charges. It’s not okay.”


Good! She's telling women today to not take crap like this, speak up and do something about it.

Also, she was approached to tell her story, because someone she had told the story to reported it. And she is not a Clinton supporter.


Anderson, who said she doesn’t support Trump or Democrat Hillary Clinton, did not initially approach The Post. A reporter contacted her after hearing her story from a person who knew of it, and she spent several days trying to decide whether to go public.



Anderson said she is not enamored with either of the major-party candidates. In May, records show, she switched her voter registration from Democrat to “no party preference.”



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: neo96
Did this one work for the Clinton Foundation like one of the others ?

Inquiring minds want to know.


Better yet, is she lying because she was bought by Clinton, like the others.


Can you provide the evidence that these women have been bought?



Oh so now yall want 'evidence'.

where is the 'evidence' about what Trump supposedly did?

Bout the only thing Trump critics has is half baked hearsay.



I have not said Trump did do what was claimed. I'd like to see that evidence as well before I rush to judgement.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: manuelram16

Why did all of Bill Clinton's accusers also wait years to come forward? That didn't stop Trump from parading them in front of the cameras and sitting them front row center at the debate.

Note: I'm not debating the veracity of any of these women's claims. However, you can't bring up Juanita Broadrrick one day in an attempt to attack Bill Clinton and by extension Hillary and then the next decry Jessica Leeds because she waited so long to come forward.


What about Paula Jones? There are a few that came out after they were sexually assaulted in the early 90's.

I'll be honest, I do have a tougher time believing the ones who waited years to come out.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: carewemust
Any legal actions taken yet? Without legal actions these are just women looking to make a quick Buck off of a billionaire.




And Trump has plenty of legal action against him, including a lawsuit for raping a 13 year old girl.




I'm referring to the women who are accusing Trump for groping kissing after his tape was last week.

I think releasing the tape and bringing forth these women is part of the same package.. that was pre-planned by the Democrats or the Republicans.




Agreed. There's too much coincidence involved here. Someone drops the hot mic and suddenly out of the woodwork come women claiming that that's EXACTLY what Trump did to them. They were looking for a quick buck and were given one by the Clinton campaign. As always, I expect this to roll of Trump's back like all the other fabricated lies.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: blackrabbit1
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

no one is voting for Bill


Correct. They're voting for the woman that has defended him and crushed the women accusing him, all while fighting for women's rights and claiming all female victims should be heard.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: neo96

For the next 4 years we are destined with crap no matter wich one wins. What can be done is making sure that next election there will be more than just 2 parties with a shot at the race only if enough people have more foresight than the average goldfish.


Ok, so who would you rather see running things, Mike Pence or Tim Kaine?



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:51 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Funny.

There won't be any evidence.

To repeat something from earlier in the thread.

After a few more weeks no one will even be talking about it.

Because the only thing American politics is about is perception.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: introvert

Funny.

There won't be any evidence.

To repeat something from earlier in the thread.

After a few more weeks no one will even be talking about it.

Because the only thing American politics is about is perception.


We will have to wait and see. Some of these women have lawyered-up.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: neo96
Did this one work for the Clinton Foundation like one of the others ?

Inquiring minds want to know.


Better yet, is she lying because she was bought by Clinton, like the others.


Can you provide the evidence that these women have been bought?



I can provide it as much as you can provide the evidence that Trump assaulted her.



posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 02:54 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

I don't have to wait.

Neither does anyone else.

From the picture that was already posted in this thread.

Rather clear WHO is the predator.


www.abovetopsecret.com...

Take a good look at Bills hand.




top topics



 
33
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join