It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Nuclear war 'IMMINENT' as Russia tells citizens to find out where the closest bunkers are

page: 3
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in


posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 11:47 AM
I'm going to DIE in a nuclear puff LONG before I realize I was hit.

Don't fear the reaper,Cav doesn't

edit on 14-10-2016 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)

edit on 14-10-2016 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)

edit on 14-10-2016 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 11:48 AM
a reply to: intrptr

And how many does this make now? Three in three days?


Profusion, there is no such thing as "nuclear war" anymore. Can't happen. Unless we end up like Chaz on the beach crying, "You maniacs finally did it!! You blew it up! Damn you! Damn you to HELL!!!" because that is what would happen if there was a nuclear "war" between Russia and the US. A true TEOTWAWKI and that will not happen because there are too many fat cats that think money will save them and they will do anything to hold onto that except blow the world up.

We will see an economic collapse if we see anything at all.

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 11:52 AM

originally posted by: ketsuko

After all, overweight lesbians are miserable and let everyone know about it everyday, but nuclear war is always something that will happen on someone else's watch. Politicians tend to placate the ones who will immediately vote for them, and this is the danger of greedy special interests always voting only in their own self interests without learning how to think about the country and everyone else around them.

Interesting rant.

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 12:01 PM

A true TEOTWAWKI and that will not happen because there are too many fat cats that think money will save them and they will do anything to hold onto that except blow the world up

Yup. Keeping everyone in line is about control, control through fear, fear of death, imminently so.

After all they worked so hard enslaving everyone, conditioning their minds to enjoy the slavery, we like our Orwellian Dystopia.

edit on 14-10-2016 by intrptr because: added pic

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 12:06 PM
Why is this just propaganda? Several reasons.

One- why bother to send people to bunkers? In modern nuclear war its over. Bunkers were fine in 60s but today even Cheyenne Mountain is not safe.

Two- No Russian Reserve forces have been activated, and Russian reserves need a great deal of time to come online unlike reserves in the West

Three- Most of the Russian military is made up of 1 year conscripts, none of those conscripts have had their terms expanded

Four- Russian forces in Syria would be brought home ASAP. Those assets are vital to Russia's security in the event of a war and would cut off and destroyed in Syria.

Russia is completely unprepared for war and not doing anything to prepare for one.

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 12:08 PM

Always wondered WHY did they invert that tree symbol anyway?

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 12:20 PM
a reply to: intrptr

Probably explains our present presidential choices!

So the problem then becomes, "what to do with al those nukes"? And that falls in line with thorium reactors. Flibe reactors to be precise. We need to convert from fission reactors and nuclear weapons to a fusion based society. It is totally pie in the sky but it is a good target to aim for because hope resides there. Even if you never reach the target a failure is still a win versus MAD.


MrSpad is right, bunkers are not made to withstand thermonuclear weapons just the old a-bomb ones. Even then there was no guarantee they would stand up against a bomb. Ah heck, in reality there is no need to even launch a weapon; just detonate them where they stand and you die but the other guy doesn't get your land and he also gets your fallout! How's that for the ultimate game of... Russian roulette!

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 12:22 PM
a reply to: Annee

You doubt me? I always found that especially hilarious considering that we are not to think that gays ever have anything bad going on their lives.

Objective. We sought to determine whether lesbians have higher rates of overweight and obesity than women of other sexual orientations.

Methods. We compared population estimates of overweight and obesity across sexual orientation groups, using data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Results. Adjusted multinomial logistic regression analyses showed lesbians have more than twice the odds of overweight (odds ratio [OR]=2.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.40, 5.18) and obesity (OR=2.47; 95% CI=1.19, 5.09) as heterosexual women. Bisexuals and women who reported their sexual orientation as “something else” (besides heterosexual, lesbian, or bisexual) showed no such increase in the odds of overweight and obesity.

Conclusions. Lesbian women have a higher prevalence of overweight and obesity than all other female sexual orientation groups. This finding suggests that lesbians are at greater risk for morbidity and mortality linked to overweight and obesity. This finding also highlights the need for interventions within this population.

This was government grant money at work.

Even HuffPo reported on it and tried to put some lipstick on that pig.

Really, it's a study about everyone, but they were specifically studying why lesbians seem to be disproportionately affected by obesity. There is no way around that, and they got $1.5 mill during the sequester years to study what amounts to 5 million Americans.
edit on 14-10-2016 by ketsuko because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 12:23 PM
a reply to: cavtrooper7

It is actually flag semaphores for the letters, "N" and "D" which stands for "nuclear disarmament".

(I just learned that earlier this month! Thanks for letting me show off!)

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 12:26 PM
Honestly, I think if anyplace fries right now. It will be the MIddle East, and that will dramatically ramp up tensions everywhere else, but it may not trigger the end of things.

But why nuke your own real estate when you can play fallout games with some other little proxy? Fry them in limited fashion and play the finger pointing game.

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 12:31 PM
a reply to: ketsuko

Yeah, you're probably right. Besides, I was just being snarky/sarcastic with a touch of gallows humor thrown in. In a nuclear exchange they would fly. In a limited exchange... the ME seems to be the place to NOT be!

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 12:35 PM

Think what it would do if you are Russia. It would cut Europe off from much of its ready petroleum. It would hurt a lot of other countries too.

Chaos in the markets ...

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 12:53 PM

THANK you for teaching me.

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 01:00 PM
It's important to remember a lot of this stuff is for domestic Russian consumption, and not necessarily intended to affect the outside world at all. Which is not to say that's what this is necessarily, but it's important to remember all the same.

None of that changes the fact that tensions are extremely high due to Russian and Western interests butting up against one another over Syria and elsewhere at the moment, though. While I don't believe war is imminent... I do have grave concerns about it.

For now, mainly for the innocents caught between. Things could escalate if there is miscalculation on one or both sides though. And with tensions this high in such a chaotic environment, such miscalculations are possible.


posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 01:02 PM
Dear Putin,

Please Nuke my neighbors first.

I just want to hear their screams before I am vapor.

Your Vaporized Friend,


posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 01:02 PM
I'm going to mix apples and oranges, straight up events and metaphysics because it is reality and fear is not the correct response.


Roughly 6 weeks ago but mentioned the war possibility, the bank crash. And its being put out now, just prior to the election.


Years ago on the warning to the benevolents thread the date that kept coming to me was 2017. This is brought up that elite have to play their cards by the end of 2016, and they have to pull of something before this election because Trump isn't on their bad guy team.

Whether or not a person can get into ufology or listens to some of the warnings, what is important is the Free Will aspect whereby the ones who gain your vote and then do the opposite, literally believe you are endorsing their rogue behaviors.

Nah, you'r e not.

Withdraw support and endorsement of the leaders and any crash's and wars.

They can't just do as they please. If they could, our world would have gone under a bleak nazi rule for thousands of years, but they can't, it didn't.

So, don't give consent. Say No!

Then hold visions of safety an that things won't ever get that bad, small problems only that can be dealt with, nothing else.

Let them know they are NOT endorsed.

I'm not afraid of anything they come up with.

edit on 14-10-2016 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 01:02 PM
a reply to: Profusion

I agree with this dude:

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 01:05 PM
a reply to: WilburnRoach

Awww, but my neighbors deserve Nuclear Hellfire!

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 01:11 PM
a reply to: Profusion

It's a combination of wankery and nostalgia. I get it, I was a teenager during the 80's too.

Here's your October surprise: The Russians really are trying to influence this election. I wonder why?

posted on Oct, 14 2016 @ 01:16 PM
a reply to: MrSpad

Do you ever fear like, maybe, if you just switched to all-fear-porn, your posts would get a lot more "likes."

Not that one gives a RA about that, but that is literally what you are up against here.

"Facts" are for people who never want to be "internet-famous."

top topics

<< 1  2    4 >>

log in