Clinton 'does not recall' ordering destruction of emails from personal server in testimony

Well those elusive answers from Hillary Clinton to questions asked by every politicians worst nightmare Judicial Watch are finally published.

JW had to get court orders for this and Hillary's answers are amazing.

Phrases like "do not recall" and "objects" are all over the place.


Read the long cover story,

Then read read the whole long sordid mess from JW


Clinton 'does not recall' ordering destruction of emails from personal server in testimony

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has said she "does not recall" ordering emails related to State Department business to be deleted or permanently erased from her personal server after she left her post in 2013, according to sworn testimony made public Thursday.

The testimony, obtained by the conservative group Judicial Watch, marked the first time Clinton was forced to answer questions under oath about her private email system. A federal judge had ordered the former secretary of state's legal team to turn over written responses to questions about the so-called "homebrew" server, which was kept in her New York home during her tenure as America's top diplomat.

Clinton and her legal team objected to all or part of 18 of the 25 questions put to her by Judicial Watch. She also filed eight separate general objections to the process under which the questions were being asked.

a reply to: xuenchen

I find it hard to believe that this process would have been employed for any other person. A deposition under oath would have been required. But as usual the Clintons have their own separate legal code.

a reply to: xuenchen

She is a bastion of transparency, an example to all in public service.

Background "refresher" stories for those who "forgot"......

FBI to begin transferring deleted Clinton emails Friday

The FBI on Friday will begin sending the “several thousand” deleted work-related emails sent through Hillary Clinton’s private sever that it uncovered during its investigation to the State Department, government lawyers said Monday.

The State Department will then process and make public those emails on a “rolling” basis, Department of Justice attorney Caroline Wolverton told U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan during oral arguments in a public-records lawsuit connected to Clinton’s use of a private email server while secretary of State.

Surprise: FBI Recovers Another 30 Benghazi Emails Hillary Clinton Deleted

The State Department says about 30 emails involving the 2012 attack on U.S. compounds in Benghazi, Libya, are among the thousands of Hillary Clinton emails recovered during the FBI’s recently closed investigation into her use of a private server.

Government lawyers told U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta Tuesday that an undetermined number of the emails among the 30 were not included in the 55,000 pages previously provided by Clinton to the State Department. The agency said it would need until the end of September to review the emails and redact potentially classified information before they are released.

Hillary is the smartest women in the world and most qualified for President but is careless and thinks wiping a server's means with a cloth.
Hillbots are so stupid.

a reply to: xuenchen

Under the US law can Judicial Watch challenge the "objects" before the judge, and is it possible the judge could deny the objection and order Mrs. Clinton to respond?

In many ways these answers are far more incriminating ... shades of "that depends on what the meaning of "is" is".

2 words

Yeah, Right.

and the FBI doesn't recall all of the facts they have when not recommending going after her.


It's a big club, and we're not in it.

FBI, CIA, NSA, DOJ... all of the agencies, all of the media, all of the officials. The banks, the corporations. All of them.


And they should all be hanged high for everyone to see for their crimes.

Forgetting important decisions you've made in your life is a classic symptom of alzheimer's disease.

Was this one on the presence of Cheryl mills as well? Or was this questioning done the legal way