It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

US, Saudis to grant 9,000 ISIS fighters free passage to Syria

page: 2
27
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 11:22 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

Not just saudis
shipandbunker.com...

Obamas epa mandated a shift in our energy market to natural gas.
Fracking everywhere. Pensylvania to wyoming.
Now that the money has been transfered from coal you dont think it will be allowed for the russians to compete in an open market?




posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 11:46 PM
link   
It's not really our business.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 11:56 PM
link   
a reply to: trollz

no sh@@ this has been in the works for a while, there are articles going back to at least sep28 stating that.
funny that not one of the four new sources says that they are letting terrorists leave, just the rt rag. they are letting refugees leave. true how do you tell who is a isis fighter and who isn't. but just as soon as they started bombing and shooting and killing non combatants, it would be the U.S. and it's allies are indiscriminately killing civilians.

please use your noggin.



edit on 13-10-2016 by hounddoghowlie because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2016 @ 12:34 AM
link   
a reply to: trollz

Pot calling the kettle black...

Is Russia Sending Jihadis to Join ISIS?



posted on Oct, 13 2016 @ 04:09 AM
link   
Well this is an RT.com story, so you have to take the accuracy and inflection with a pinch of salt. A big pinch of salt.

Regardless, getting the combatants out of the city - any city - is the right thing to do. It saves on civilian casualties and, let's face it, saves Mosul being destroyed.

The Russian approach of destroying cities and everything within is an affront. Mosul will not be an Aleppo, or a Grozny. We should be thankful that if the psychotic ISIS vacate the city then Mosul won't be further destroyed.
edit on 13/10/2016 by paraphi because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2016 @ 06:21 AM
link   
a reply to: trollz

The succession of administrations in western governments, which have propagated terrorism in the Middle East, is a testament to how well controlled our populations really are. There is no question remaining, as to who owns the terror networks, who started them, funded them, and trained their top tier. They are nothing short of assets of the broader intelligence infrastructure that our taxes pay for, designed from the outset, often without their knowledge, to be nothing more than a tool of fear, to control populations at home with.

Frankly speaking, it is high time that the people of the West rose up to oust their governments, clear out their intelligence agencies, and replace both structures with people whose loyalties are to the people, not the businesses, or financiers who own those nations by default.



posted on Oct, 13 2016 @ 06:26 AM
link   
a reply to: trollz

only plus side of WW3 is that Saudi Arabia will be glassed.

Pigs



posted on Oct, 13 2016 @ 06:45 AM
link   
The war criminal governments of the "coalition" should hang for their crimes.

This is just the peak of a very large mountain.



posted on Oct, 13 2016 @ 08:34 AM
link   
Just think curses within your mind that will manifest into a lightning strike and obliterate the Cube of Mecca.

If they want war, give em hell. Obviously the lightning that took down the crane recently at the Cube of Mecca stadium, was not enough of a warning to Allah's (Lucifer's) mud monkeys.
edit on 13-10-2016 by Rapha because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2016 @ 09:09 AM
link   
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

No boots on the ground, so another solution... arm/support rebels/terrorists.

You could say nobody would do such a thing but it's like slaughtering an animal, the first time it's hard after a few it's get much more easy and after thousands, just normal.
edit on 13-10-2016 by Pluginn because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2016 @ 01:36 PM
link   
My first thought was, what an opportunity to gather the criminals together in one place and squash them, either by imprisoning or simple destruction, a big sting operation to get a bunch of these slimeballs at once. Reminded me of a roach motel commercial,"roaches check in but they don't check out."



posted on Oct, 13 2016 @ 03:17 PM
link   
a reply to: trollz

Well, if we're lucky maybe they just want to get as many as possible all together in one spot in order to wipe them out in one gigantic swoop?! Ah well...can only dream.... Any other reason would be incomprehensible IF the US is really behind this.

Oops, posted this BEFORE reading that basically the same thing was already said...nice to see others close to being on the same page though!
edit on 13-10-2016 by Rubicon3 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 05:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
WHY DOES THE USA CARE ABOUT SYRIA?


As an American - That's a really #ing good question.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 06:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: chuck258

originally posted by: carewemust
WHY DOES THE USA CARE ABOUT SYRIA?

As an American - That's a really #ing good question.

One that has been answered many times, including in this very thread.
Yet people refuse to believe it or ignore it.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 06:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: chuck258

originally posted by: carewemust
WHY DOES THE USA CARE ABOUT SYRIA?


As an American - That's a really #ing good question.


I don't think the USA does, just the elites. It seemed to start out supporting an uprising which felt quite noble. Now I wish we would just pull out, support the mess we left in Iraq and Afg and shore up Turkeys borders.



posted on Oct, 15 2016 @ 06:22 PM
link   
Its why, if I was american, I couldn't vote for Clinton because she has done nothing to stop the innocent slaughter of women and childen in the plundering of Syria. Trump might not be any better but there is a chance, although slim, that he might put an end to it. If he could just save ones childs life, then that is better, than the alternative.



new topics

top topics



 
27
<< 1   >>

log in

join