It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Trump Accused Of Raping 13-Year-Old Girl: Lawsuit From Casey Anthony Attorney Allowed In Fed Court

page: 3
51
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 10:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Sremmos80

The Point I was attempting to make there was if that Story had any Semblance of Truth to it , Mr. Trump would have been Prosecuted in a Court of Law and Jailed . Did that Actually Happen ? No . Just Another attempt of Defamation of Character against Mr. Trump . If this keeps up , a Lot of Lawyers will Enrich themselves Suing these People for Slander . That by the way , is No Joking Matter .
edit on 12-10-2016 by Zanti Misfit because: spelling




posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 10:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Sremmos80

The Point I was attempting to make there was if that Story had any Semblance of Truth to it , Mr. Trump would have been Prosecuted in as Court of Law and Jailed . Did that Actually Happen ? No . Just Another attempt of Defamation of Character against Mr. Trump . If this keeps up , a Lot of Lawyers will Enrich themselves Suing these People for Slander . That by the way , is No Joking Matter .


Did you forget that Trump has a history of threatening people with financial ruin and otherwise being "destroyed" if they go against him?

This was also stated by his ex wife, and other people who have been involved with him.......

He also has a lot of money which buys a lot of silence......

If your supposition was right, then I suppose Hillary is innocent? And every OTHER person that hasnt been formally convicted?

You know for a FACT what you just said is BS

Lack of a conviction does not equal innocence.......



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 10:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Were you there? No? Then you don't know if it happened. Maybe the victim didn't report the rape for good reason. She may have been intimidated or coerced to stay quiet and not contact authorities. Statute of limitations probably expired and the victim's only option was to pursue civil recourse.
edit on 12-10-2016 by IamALWAYSright because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 10:30 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

How convenient.

On one hand we have the rapist.

On the other, we have the defender of rapists.

Who ever shall we choose!?!?

I'll just bid you all farewell now because if one of these idgits is elected America as we formally knew it will be no more.

Jeez, even if this ends up being false, its one hell of an accusation.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 10:31 PM
link   
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

" If your supposition was right, then I suppose Hillary is innocent? And every OTHER person that hasnt been formally convicted? "

Hillary Clinton has no Relevance in this Thread , it's about Mr. Trump .





" Did you forget that Trump has a history of threatening people with financial ruin and otherwise being "destroyed" if they go against him?

This was also stated by his ex wife, and other people who have been involved with him.......

He also has a lot of money which buys a lot of silence...... "



That is Nothing more than Hearsay and Conjecture .


If you are going to Defend an Accusation , at Least Present a Viable Argument based on Facts , or Admit that " Dog " don't Hunt .


edit on 12-10-2016 by Zanti Misfit because: spelling



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 10:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask


If you are going to Defend an Accusation , at Least Present a Viable Argument based on Facts , or Admit that " Dog " won't Hunt .



I think the information already out on it pretty well establishes the validity of the charges , or else it wouldnt be going to fed court........

Had they not deemed the accusation Valid they wouldnt have a date set......

Good thing youre not a judge eh?



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 10:34 PM
link   
These were older men experienced in the ways of manipulation and coercion. According to what I've read:

They had dangled the carrot of "modeling career" in front of this very naive girls and groomed them into sex slaves, promising them fame, fortune and to supply them their dreams.

Things happened incrementally, so that the girl would think, well, I did that, so I guess a little more isn't too bad -- the lobster in the pot treatment. Epstein manipulated them, made promises, no doubt shamed them, made them think "this is what its like in the big league's girls, so better get used to it..." Other girls reinforced this "culture" and they didn't know what they were into until it was too late.

This was methodical and very sick, if true.

= AB



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 10:39 PM
link   
a reply to: IamALWAYSright

Maybe is Not Conclusive .



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 10:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask


If you are going to Defend an Accusation , at Least Present a Viable Argument based on Facts , or Admit that " Dog " won't Hunt .



I think the information already out on it pretty well establishes the validity of the charges , or else it wouldnt be going to fed court........

Had they not deemed the accusation Valid they wouldnt have a date set......

Good thing youre not a judge eh?



You say ? LINK Please .



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 10:43 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

HOAX/Untrue

www.theguardian.com...



Lawsuits accusing Donald Trump of sexually assaulting a child in the 1990s appear to have been orchestrated by an eccentric anti-Trump campaigner with a record of making outlandish claims about celebrities. Norm Lubow, a former producer on the Jerry Springer TV show, has previously been involved with disputed allegations that OJ Simpson bought illegal drugs on the day Simpson’s wife was murdered, and that Kurt Cobain’s widow had the Nirvana frontman killed.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 10:47 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian


A lawsuit claiming that Republican nominee Donald Trump raped at least one 13-year-old girl in 1994 may have its day in court after a federal judge reportedly ordered a status conference to review the case, the Independent reported Tuesday.


So why did they wait over 20 years to file??

What in it for the two girls?

Have they been promised something, perhaps by the Clinton foundation ?

Look, look, everyone, Trump is a rapist!!! Really!!! Don't fall for this folks this is just another distraction, so people don't pay attention at wikileaks email dumps.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 10:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

Look at my comment above.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 10:49 PM
link   
a reply to: ksiezyc

Thank you I am happy to see that.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 10:50 PM
link   
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask


Here , I will do it for You ........




The New York lawsuit was accompanied by a supporting affidavit from a woman using the name “Tiffany Doe”, who claims to have worked for Epstein at the time and procured the young girl for the two men. The allegations made in the suit have been reported by several media outlets.

The legal action in Manhattan follows a near-identical suit in California that made the same allegations against Trump and Epstein. That case was promptly thrown out after a federal judge ruled that the complaint cited statutes that did not apply to it. Epstein has through representatives also denied the allegations.

Alan Garten, an attorney for the Trump Organization, described the allegations against Trump as “a complete fabrication” that appeared to be politically motivated. “This is basically a sham lawsuit brought by someone who desires to impact the presidential election,” said Garten.

Advertisement

Trump’s team said the lawsuit was badly flawed. “I don’t even know if there is a plaintiff,” said Garten. “I don’t know a lawyer worthy of the bar who would put his name to this lawsuit.” Meagher, however, insisted that he had met the plaintiff and separately spoken to her over video-conference. “She definitely exists,” said Meagher.





www.theguardian.com...








edit on 12-10-2016 by Zanti Misfit because: link



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 10:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

It needs attention. The Guardian is a good source. Frankly this should be reported as a Hoax. But people are buying it.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 10:51 PM
link   
a reply to: ksiezyc

According to the article in the OP it was re-filed this week.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 10:57 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

Does that change anything? False then, but now it's true?



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 11:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: M5xaz
 


Strange that NYT would like to make a big deal with this story while remaining silent on the following FACTS:

= the blue dress with the DNA PROVES that the real sexual predator is BILL CLINTON
= recorded history and news articles in the NYT from the 90s proves that the enabler of that predator is HILLARY



 





Are you suggesting that Bill Clinton raped Monica Lewinsky?



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 11:10 PM
link   
a reply to: ksiezyc

I don't know. Maybe hopes for a different judge to go with their new attorneys.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 11:10 PM
link   
a reply to: ksiezyc

Just Because a Suit was Refiled does not Mean it will be Heard .




top topics



 
51
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join