It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

What if only men voted?

page: 2
16
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:40 PM
link   
And we now have a world where sandwiches aren't being made.





posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: angeldoll

And Hillary is a woman who has stayed married to and continually enables a dirty old man.

Your point?


So your pervert is better than your opponents husband??



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: WilburnRoach

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: angeldoll

And Hillary is a woman who has stayed married to and continually enables a dirty old man.

Your point?


So your pervert is better than your opponents husband??


Neither one is good.

But your candidate covered up her perverted husband's activities and attacked his victims for political gain.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:46 PM
link   
so, since you want to protect your finances, we all have to tolerate someone in the whitehouse that shows very little respect for women, admits to accousting their bodies while his republican supporters keep telling us to keep our legs crossed!! got it!!



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Indigo5

I have to ask... Are these infographics accurate?

Because if so, the men of America need a serious word having with them.


As an American man, in my opinion you may keep your counsel to yourself.

It appears to me as if the majority of ladies of my fine nation should use their brains and not their reproductive organs to vote.

Why do you assume they're not using their brains?



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:47 PM
link   
So in the battle of the groper VS the rapist enabler the women are going for the rapist enabler???

2 things
1) I highly doubt the accuracy of the poll
2) If its accurate this in mind shows sexism as the women would be voting based on gender alone, Id put money on a high percentage of those voting for Hillary are doing so based on the "Its time for a women president" mentality.

Ill throw in a 3rd coz Im feeling like a bit of a cheeky bugger today,
3) maybe this poll shows that its was better back in the days before women could vote



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:49 PM
link   
a reply to: WilburnRoach

Nope just stating there's an equivalency here. Also by enabling it, she becomes a part of the problem. So she owns it now too. Especially as one who claims to be a defender of women's rights and against the mistreatment of women.

My only point was that they are equivalent, they cancel each other out.

Therefor as it applies to both candidates there is no point, unless to decry both candidates.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: WilburnRoach

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: angeldoll

And Hillary is a woman who has stayed married to and continually enables a dirty old man.

Your point?


So your pervert is better than your opponents husband??


Neither one is good.

But your candidate covered up her perverted husband's activities and attacked his victims for political gain.


Let's look at some real perversion. Trump Sexualizing his own daughter with H. Stern. you ok with that?

www.redstate.com...

and this....

www.ibtimes.com...

perversion indeed.




edit on 12-10-2016 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:49 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

you mean after all these decades, men still haven't learned how to make a sandwich??
oh well, considering what they are putting into lunchmeat these days, maybe it's good they still don't know how.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Indigo5

I have to ask... Are these infographics accurate?

Because if so, the men of America need a serious word having with them.


As an American man, in my opinion you may keep your counsel to yourself.

It appears to me as if the majority of ladies of my fine nation should use their brains and not their reproductive organs to vote.

Why do you assume they're not using their brains?


Because they obviously have not used critical thinking to deduce that HIllary Clinton is the worst possible choice for President in the history of the USA.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: dawnstar
so, since you want to protect your finances, we all have to tolerate someone in the whitehouse that shows very little respect for women, admits to accousting their bodies while his republican supporters keep telling us to keep our legs crossed!! got it!!



Yes actually.

That takes place in DC and not in my house.

Sorry you find it offensive, but I found eight years of Obama telling me to suck it up and accept gay marriage, paying for other people's abortions, and letting grown men into my locker room equally offensive.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: WilburnRoach

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: angeldoll

And Hillary is a woman who has stayed married to and continually enables a dirty old man.

Your point?


So your pervert is better than your opponents husband??


Neither one is good.

But your candidate covered up her perverted husband's activities and attacked his victims for political gain.


Let's look at some real perversion. Sexualizing his own daughter with H. Stern.

www.redstate.com...

and this....

www.ibtimes.com...

perversion indeed.



Words are really scary, aren't they?



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Puppylove
except that it's much easier for a president to kick her dirty, cheating husband out of the white house if she sees evidence that he will disgrace her presidency than it is to kick the president out of the white house if we start getting reports that he is assaulting ambassador's daughters.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

That's right...




posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:54 PM
link   
Then someone has chemically subdued the female populace and we will be going to war soon.
Again...



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: ssenerawa
a reply to: Kali74

Sorry, but Clinton is not what you want for the example of a first woman president. If anything. Once elected she'll make voters have a reason not to vote for a woman ever again.


Nope, not voting for her. That wasn't my point. My point was women will stop Trump from being president.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:55 PM
link   
a reply to: dawnstar

That ship has sailed long ago. Getting a divorce or taking a stand against him now is too late. Stop making excuses.

Both candidates have skeletons in these closets. Let's accept that and either hang both, or simply move on.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: angeldoll

And Hillary is a woman who has stayed married to and continually enables a dirty old man.



That's pretty low level thinking. None of us are to judge two people who choose to remain married. In fact it's kind of strange that right-wing Catholics would not respect people who choose to work through the problems in a marriage over divorce.

Based on that map it tells me women in the middle of the country are smarter than men, and the men are predictably less intelligent than the men in the coastal states. Not surprising at all.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Puppylove
except that it's much easier for a president to kick her dirty, cheating husband out of the white house if she sees evidence that he will disgrace her presidency than it is to kick the president out of the white house if we start getting reports that he is assaulting ambassador's daughters.




Ha, Ha!

Do you really, truly, and honestly think that the Congress, not matter which party controls it, would hesitate for one second to impeach him? They would rediscover bipartisanship so fast your head would spin.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: WilburnRoach

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: angeldoll

And Hillary is a woman who has stayed married to and continually enables a dirty old man.

Your point?


So your pervert is better than your opponents husband??


Neither one is good.

But your candidate covered up her perverted husband's activities and attacked his victims for political gain.


Let's look at some real perversion. Sexualizing his own daughter with H. Stern.

www.redstate.com...

and this....

www.ibtimes.com...

perversion indeed.



Words are really scary, aren't they?


Words aren't scary but they certainly point to the honor and integrity of people saying them or agreeing with them and also to their supporters.


edit on 12-10-2016 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
16
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join