It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

0HOUR1 claims to have sent Hillary's 33,000 missing emails to WikiLeaks

page: 3
40
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:04 PM
link   
a reply to: digital01anarchy

There was some speculation that if her server had been hacked prior to being discovered that those emails could still exist somewhere on the dark web. Or that whomever hacked her could have her emails and be waiting to choke them up or use them in some capacity.




posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:06 PM
link   

According to her it was all about yoga and Chelsea's wedding...


Chelsea must have been a royal Bridezilla for there to be 33,000 emails on a wedding. Either that or Hillary spent way too much time waxing poetic about downward dog.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko


According to her it was all about yoga and Chelsea's wedding...


Chelsea must have been a royal Bridezilla for there to be 33,000 emails on a wedding. Either that or Hillary spent way too much time waxing poetic about downward dog.



HRC exact quote:

"We went through a thorough process to identify all of my work-related emails and deliver them to the State Department," she said, adding that all other emails were personal and pertained to matters such as "yoga routines," "family vacations," and "planning Chelsea's wedding."



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: digital01anarchy
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Yeah i will believe it when wikileaks puts the emails on their site. 33,000 emails on the eve of the election sounds like a setup. First getting thouse emails is impossible now so it would mean someone sat on them? Why release them now? If wikileaks vets the emails the presidential election will be over and WW3 will have been started by the time we get them because they have to make sure they are accurate and not fakes.

Sorry but i dont trust anon as it could be anyone and is most likely counter intelligence fakes.

0day is what they call a vulnerability that is brand new.
If i was wikileaks i would open that file in computer without a nic and in a virtualized os with a kill switch on the harddrive.



This gets interesting. This is the story as I currently understand it.

Everyone has been concentrating on the contents of the wikileaks data. Somebody decided to look more closely at the addresses in use, which lead to identifying a handful of additional servers that were being run by the Clintons but hadn't been previously disclosed.

These servers were then targeted. The claim is that a backup of the emails was found on one of them.

Identifying these servers only came about from the wikileaks release, which is why it has only happened now.

It was always assumed that a backup existed somewhere, simply because that might represent a lot of information too important to lose.

This could all be trolling and lulz, but it's not outside the realm of possibility.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: EvillerBob

originally posted by: digital01anarchy
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Yeah i will believe it when wikileaks puts the emails on their site. 33,000 emails on the eve of the election sounds like a setup. First getting thouse emails is impossible now so it would mean someone sat on them? Why release them now? If wikileaks vets the emails the presidential election will be over and WW3 will have been started by the time we get them because they have to make sure they are accurate and not fakes.

Sorry but i dont trust anon as it could be anyone and is most likely counter intelligence fakes.

0day is what they call a vulnerability that is brand new.
If i was wikileaks i would open that file in computer without a nic and in a virtualized os with a kill switch on the harddrive.



This gets interesting. This is the story as I currently understand it.

Everyone has been concentrating on the contents of the wikileaks data. Somebody decided to look more closely at the addresses in use, which lead to identifying a handful of additional servers that were being run by the Clintons but hadn't been previously disclosed.

These servers were then targeted. The claim is that a backup of the emails was found on one of them.

Identifying these servers only came about from the wikileaks release, which is why it has only happened now.

It was always assumed that a backup existed somewhere, simply because that might represent a lot of information too important to lose.

This could all be trolling and lulz, but it's not outside the realm of possibility.


One thing is for certain...multiple email addresses were used by top Clinton members...as far as servers...my guess is it was different domains on the same server...easier to clean up.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:18 PM
link   
looks like someone got control of Podesta's Twitter account..





edit on Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:20:25 -0500 by JacKatMtn because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

One thing is for certain...multiple email addresses were used by top Clinton members...as far as servers...my guess is it was different domains on the same server...easier to clean up.


If I recall the comment that had been posted, they were on a server hosting a ridiculous amount of other sites, so it's possible that the secondary domains all exist in a datacentre somewhere with only the main Clinton account on the server in her bathroom.

The Clinton IT guy doesn't seem to be the sharpest tool in the box, poor security on a shared server running software with known (and possibly unpatched) vulns wouldn't surprise me.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:21 PM
link   
a reply to: CriticalStinker

You are 100% correct as to how desensitized the voters are at this point and I have to wonder if that hasn't been done on purpose. Flog everyone with everything so that voter fatigue sets in and no one goes to the polls. Low turnout favors the dems by far with the electronic rigging they've got in play. Only massively huge turnout and and overwhelming win by the Donald would make it too hard for them to rig.

They have to be able to do it convincingly and in the right precincts, which is another big reason I think Seth Rich was murdered.

The position he had placed him in exactly the right spot to see this type of shenanigans in play. and if he really was a Bernie fan, though he had been hired by the Clinton campaign to work for them directly from the DNC, then he was certainly the type of person who would have done something like leak this out to WikiLeaks.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:22 PM
link   
a reply to: EvillerBob

If it really is what happened, I would have to say that the people holding those files after everything that had already been hacked.... well, they were pretty stupid.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
looks like someone got control of Podesta's Twitter account..






Oh they were posting screenshots from inside his Apple account, his current emails, even using the tracking app to show where he was at the time.

Again, it's unclear if that was genuine or just trolling, but someone made a comment about his using the same password for everything so maybe the Twitter hijack is flowing from that?



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:25 PM
link   
a reply to: EvillerBob

This makes a good deal of sense and I could see how something like this might have happened in such a short time frame.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:25 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical




if he really was a Bernie fan, though he had been hired by the Clinton campaign to work for them directly from the DNC/quote]

The people that he worked for in Nebraska were solid Bernie people. I believe he was too.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical

Is there anything at all that could change your mind regarding your support of Hillary or her insistence that she did nothing wrong?


There is already ample PROOF that Hillary has done "wrong" (to put it mildly) on several occasions, in just the past 5 years. If Hillary's loyal supporters change their mind about her, it still will not change their vote.

But those who are/were on the fence, are getting off the fence and coming over to Donald Trump's side. Trump will work to bring an improved quality of life for average Americans. Wanting a "better life" is a bottom line common denominator that all working Americans share.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: WilburnRoach
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

The 33,000 deleted emails? Yeah right!


DaHaHaHa

FBI to give deleted Clinton emails back to State Dept.


According to FBI Director James Comey, investigators “discovered several thousand work-related" messages that were not among the roughly 30,000 emails Clinton gave to the government in 2014. The former secretary of State and her lawyers deleted approximately half of the 60,000 emails on her server, claiming at the time that they were purely personal and did not belong in the government’s hands.

The FBI recovered the emails through digital traces left on decommissioned servers and via the inboxes of people with whom Clinton communicated, Comey said.





posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: EvillerBob

If it really is what happened, I would have to say that the people holding those files after everything that had already been hacked.... well, they were pretty stupid.


You mean their IT guy who got caught posting on reddit under his usual username, looking for help to mass-edit email headers? I don't think it's a stretch to call him pretty stupid. Or perhaps just completely out of his depth, being asked to do stuff that he never expected to do.

Even smart guys don't automatically make good criminals, especially if they're not expecting to need or use that mindset.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:27 PM
link   
a reply to: EvillerBob

I don't know much of how this occurred, I just saw that image on the #podesta on twitter...



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
a reply to: EvillerBob

I don't know much of how this occurred, I just saw that image on the #podesta on twitter...



Twitter has been tremendously fun tonight!



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: pavil
Who is Nick Merrill they reference in the tweet?



What if it's not that guy, but this guy?


Nicholas Merrill is an American system administrator, computer programmer and entrepreneur. He is the founder of Calyx Internet Access, an internet and hosted service provider founded in 1995, and of the non-profit Calyx Institute. He was the first person to file a constitutional challenge against the National Security Letters statute in the USA PATRIOT Act.


Wikipedia

And the "Nick Merrill" part is a signature?

This guy sounds like he might have beef with the feds and could potentially have the skillz to do what is claimed, but then why would he sign his name if he wanted to remain anonymous?



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Spacespider
33,000 emails... ?!

That is 11 emails a day in the last 8 years...


They were all to me. She was totally obsessed after I dumped her. That's how she rolls. Oh, and we only did yoga twice.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: EvillerBob

originally posted by: digital01anarchy
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Yeah i will believe it when wikileaks puts the emails on their site. 33,000 emails on the eve of the election sounds like a setup. First getting thouse emails is impossible now so it would mean someone sat on them? Why release them now? If wikileaks vets the emails the presidential election will be over and WW3 will have been started by the time we get them because they have to make sure they are accurate and not fakes.

Sorry but i dont trust anon as it could be anyone and is most likely counter intelligence fakes.

0day is what they call a vulnerability that is brand new.
If i was wikileaks i would open that file in computer without a nic and in a virtualized os with a kill switch on the harddrive.



This gets interesting. This is the story as I currently understand it.

Everyone has been concentrating on the contents of the wikileaks data. Somebody decided to look more closely at the addresses in use, which lead to identifying a handful of additional servers that were being run by the Clintons but hadn't been previously disclosed.

These servers were then targeted. The claim is that a backup of the emails was found on one of them.

Identifying these servers only came about from the wikileaks release, which is why it has only happened now.

It was always assumed that a backup existed somewhere, simply because that might represent a lot of information too important to lose.

This could all be trolling and lulz, but it's not outside the realm of possibility.


Interesting rumor.



new topics

top topics



 
40
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join