It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

0HOUR1 claims to have sent Hillary's 33,000 missing emails to WikiLeaks

page: 1
40
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+18 more 
posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:11 PM
link   

HRCOFFICE.COM...
WE FOUND 33,000 EMAILS THEY WENT TO WIKILEAKS
GET READY F**K YOU NICK MERRILL
#ANONYMOUS
YES THE MISSING ONES!


0HOUR1 twitter feed

From my understanding, this is an Anonymous-related twitter handle and, if the tweet quoted is true, might make some waves depending on what is released.

A question for Hillary supporters, or anyone who think this whole email debacle is 'no big deal:"

Is there anything at all that could change your mind regarding your support of Hillary or her insistence that she did nothing wrong?
edit on 12-10-2016 by jadedANDcynical because: slight typo in title




posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:13 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

And with baited breath we wait. Popcorn and favorite chair-check.

And lets hope that somehow both candidates are derailed and a whole new election is called because this one is A Real Clown Show.
edit on PMWednesday15America/Chicago10V2016101531 by ThoughtIsMadness because: (no reason given)

edit on PMWednesday22America/Chicago10V2016102231 by ThoughtIsMadness because: edited because im not clever.

edit on PMWednesday23America/Chicago10V2016102331 by ThoughtIsMadness because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:14 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical


This would be awesome news if it's true. I'm definitely going to the store to stock up on popcorn.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:16 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

So. Non redacted classified Intel?



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:17 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Why didn't they just release them on paste bin with most of anon leaks? Are they sending them to wiki for authentication?



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:18 PM
link   
a reply to: ssenerawa

Nah, it's all just yoga routines and wedding plans, dontchaknow?

It would be something indeed if there is non-redacted classified info found within all of those "personal," deleted emails would it not?

Kinda make the FBI look even more foolish wouldn't it?

I still think that there is nothing that could be released that would dissuade her true believers to change their minds.

 


a reply to: TheGlitchyNinja


That's my take on things, Wikileaks is known to vet their info prior to posting.

I could see the info being released through other channels and more easily be brushed off. This way, coming from WikiLeaks, a more official response would be required.

As others have said in other threads, could be used for more justification for worsening relations between the U.S. and Russia.
edit on 12-10-2016 by jadedANDcynical because: additional comment



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:18 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

The 33,000 deleted emails? Yeah right!



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:19 PM
link   
Given their silence until today I had been wondering if they were an actual hacker group, given all the thunder this year without their names on it...

They might have an armada of nasty data coming, if they are the real dealio...
edit on 12-10-2016 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: WilburnRoach
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

The 33,000 deleted emails? Yeah right!


You better hope they don't

Or

You may be getting a job.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:24 PM
link   
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Yeah i will believe it when wikileaks puts the emails on their site. 33,000 emails on the eve of the election sounds like a setup. First getting thouse emails is impossible now so it would mean someone sat on them? Why release them now? If wikileaks vets the emails the presidential election will be over and WW3 will have been started by the time we get them because they have to make sure they are accurate and not fakes.

Sorry but i dont trust anon as it could be anyone and is most likely counter intelligence fakes.

0day is what they call a vulnerability that is brand new.
If i was wikileaks i would open that file in computer without a nic and in a virtualized os with a kill switch on the harddrive.


edit on 12-10-2016 by digital01anarchy because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:29 PM
link   
a reply to: WilburnRoach

A rather obnoxious number isn't it?
That would at least make her a royal text queen.
edit on Rpm101216v31201600000052 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:30 PM
link   
a reply to: digital01anarchy

I don't discount this as a possibility, which is why I put the word, "claims," in the OP title.

However, if the files are legit, and can be verified, well then I guess that's a whole other ball of wax eh?

I am well aware that "Anonymous," has a shifty and shady history of subversiveness. It is well known to be thought of as cointelpro and so anything posted is taken with a modicum of salt.

I've also seen it said that both Assange and Snowden are CIA, which throws an entirely separate monkey wrench into the works.

All in all, this election cycle has been one to remember and who knows what the final outcome will be.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:32 PM
link   
33,000 emails... ?!

That is 11 emails a day in the last 8 years...



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: whyamIhere

originally posted by: WilburnRoach
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

The 33,000 deleted emails? Yeah right!


You better hope they don't

Or

You may be getting a job.


According to some ATS members I have a job?? lol

I'm self employed, thanks.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: WilburnRoach

A rather obnoxious number isn't it?
That would at least make her a royal text queen.


I'm guessing its all spam, she deletes what we all delete.


+23 more 
posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: WilburnRoach

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: WilburnRoach

A rather obnoxious number isn't it?
That would at least make her a royal text queen.


I'm guessing its all spam, she deletes what we all delete.


Really? You delete your spam with bleachbit? ......right.

Sell that # somewhere else.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: digital01anarchy
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Yeah i will believe it when wikileaks puts the emails on their site. 33,000 emails on the eve of the election sounds like a setup. First getting thouse emails is impossible now so it would mean someone sat on them? Why release them now? If wikileaks vets the emails the presidential election will be over and WW3 will have been started by the time we get them because they have to make sure they are accurate and not fakes.


"October Surprise" comes to mind.

There's a reason to do things at the last minute. Humans tend to forget things from last week, their breakfast, etc.

They could have uploaded them a while ago. They could have sat on them, wikileaks could have been sitting on them, etc.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: WilburnRoach

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: WilburnRoach

A rather obnoxious number isn't it?
That would at least make her a royal text queen.


I'm guessing its all spam, she deletes what we all delete.


According to her it was all about yoga and Chelsea's wedding...

Not seeing her getting much spam with that account though...it isn't like she signed up for anything with it as she didn't want anyone to know about it.
edit on 10/12/16 by Vasa Croe because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:45 PM
link   
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Comey claim that they had recovered most? The key would then be if the emails contradict Comey, then it's handcuffs for all.

I really, truly hope there is something in there. Enough already with Hillary.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:45 PM
link   
As we know from The Director, Hillary's server was not secure.
So would not be surprised that someone in fact did secure them.

Interesting the twitter mentions Seth Rich....


edit on 12-10-2016 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
40
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join