It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Universal Vacuum Inertial Torsion Technologies

page: 1
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 11:26 AM
link   
Universal Vacuum Inertial Torsion Technologies (UVITOR) is the name of a company with laboratories in Bangkok, Thailand. Its CEO is Marina A. Lobova.

Also on the team of the company is Russian theoretical physicist Gennady I. Shipov, who has expanded on Newton's Laws. He has found that inertial and gravitational mass are not equivalent. And he has developed a theory of what's actually present in the material vacuum.

The website for this company houses several scientific papers, some of them in English.

Here is one of them. The title is "Antigravity Probe M (APM)" and the PDF is 10 pages. Here is the opening paragraph and the Conclusions:


AP M is a physical experiment aimed to test the changes of weight of a 3–D gyroscope comparing its mass at rest and during its precession with the purpose to explore the effects of torsion fields, predicted by G. Shipov in his Unified Field Theory published in “The Theory of Physical Vacuum". . .



shipov.com...


One who follows what is going on in the world knows that this type of technology exists, it just isn't made public.

But surely at some time in the future, it will, for the benefit of the public.




posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 11:44 AM
link   
Some more information...


Dr. Gennady Shipov, a Russian physicist, and his team developed the 4-D Warp Engine, a state of the art project for v-teleportation of a macro system. The prototype of the 4-D warp engine creates a twist and curve in space-time in front of itself and "falls" into it.

Shipov

Moving the space time continuum out of the way to fall into the gap would be a neat trick..It is by the way one impression I had of the thingy I saw one night. Although just a light without discernible 'craft' features, I had the distinct impression it was gathering something from in front of it and pushing that behind it... or something.

This is the first time I have heard this effect described scientifically.

'Falling into a space time vacuum' just ahead of the direction of flight.

Whats this about a prototype?



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 11:59 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

I looked for a paper on the website to post about it, but didn't find one in English.

There are videos posted on the website, also. I don't see one specifically about the prototype, however. The videos are under "Experiments" on the Science page.

edit on 10/12/2016 by ConnectDots because: Clarify



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 12:14 PM
link   
a reply to: ConnectDots

I think they may have 'designed a prototype', not yet built it. Even making the effect in a lab would herald a major change to physics as we understand them.

Other 'features' all supported by witness testimony...


*The ability to instantly change direction and speed

*Movement occurs without reaction to friction or mass

*Able to move in any media (on land or water, under water, in the air or space)

Adding, disappearing then reappearing in another location...

It really would seem to violate the laws of physics from our 3D perceptive, because once you move to the 'fourth dimension' you become invisible to us here.

Now, describing said machinery is whole lots different than producing it. How does one make machines here that operate 'over there'?



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 02:18 PM
link   
Apparently American Antigravity interviewed Gennady Shipov in 2005. There is a 9 page PDF of the interview online:


AAG:

I think that most people vaguely connect the term "Torsion Field" to the idea of spin, but this is an aspect of science that the general public isn't very aware of. Can you offer a simple explanation that might help us visualize what exactly these torsion fields are, and how they may be important to space-propulsion?

Shipov:

It is a complicated question. Simultaneously it is the most important.

We’ll start with the differences in my approach to torsion fields - in my work torsion fields are not simply an addition to existing physical fields. Torsion fields play a major role in the Theory of Physical Vacuum and their introduction in science demands a change of the scientific paradigm. The substantive provision of this new scientific paradigm is that any motion is rotation that is equivalent to the statement that any motion within the Nature involves acceleration. . . .

www.americanantigravity.com...


A "change of the scientific paradigm" is exactly what we need. But it is difficult. There are so many things going up against a change of paradigm.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 03:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: ConnectDots
Apparently American Antigravity interviewed Gennady Shipov in 2005.


From page 6 of 9:




www.americanantigravity.com...

Wikipedia really needs to improve, and do something about the false statement "Torsion field (pseudoscience)."

Wikipedia is part of the problem of how to bring about the paradigm shift that is badly needed in science.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 04:26 PM
link   
a reply to: ConnectDots

ROFL

I've got a Turbo Encabulator I'd love to sell you. It is paradigm shifting!




posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 04:35 PM
link   
a reply to: moebius

And your point is?



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 05:42 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 06:15 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:00 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:10 PM
link   

Attention



Enough with the off topic banter and bickering.

Discuss the topic of the thread. Not each other, or about each others posting styles.

Off topic posts will be removed. If they continue, post bans will be handed out.

Do not reply to this post.



posted on Oct, 12 2016 @ 07:20 PM
link   
OP, your source claims to have done an experiment with a gyroscope, claiming it weighs less when in precession.



The original weight of 3-D gyroscope at rest was measured at 46.45 g. During
precession 3-D gyroscope lost weight down to 46.3 g. After 3-D gyroscope
stopped to rotate its weight returned to its original 46.45 g.
Ω < 3,000 RPM.



I don't recall this being possible. Does anyone here have the equipment to back this up?



posted on Oct, 13 2016 @ 01:00 AM
link   
This is from the 16 page PDF "Geometrization of the Energy-Momentum Tensor in a Theory of Physical Vacuum, an Exotic Matter and a Warp Drive":




shipov.com...



posted on Oct, 13 2016 @ 01:03 AM
link   
Just a couple of scammers

torsionfraud.narod.ru...



posted on Oct, 13 2016 @ 01:46 AM
link   
a reply to: ConnectDots

I'm going to have to say, it looks like someone butchered a couple film reels form a movie projector, put a CD ROM on top, opened up a basic PSU from an old PC, and just exposed the electric motors from the movie projector, and called it a 4-D gyroscope.



posted on Oct, 13 2016 @ 05:29 AM
link   
a reply to: WeAre0ne

So what?

Here is a photo of Faraday's apparatus:




www.rigb.org...



posted on Oct, 13 2016 @ 05:32 AM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce

Of course there will be a smear.

There always is.



posted on Oct, 13 2016 @ 05:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce
Just a couple of scammers

torsionfraud.narod.ru...



Apparently scams and hoaxes such as in the OP are considered appropriate here these days.



posted on Oct, 13 2016 @ 06:03 AM
link   
This is from the Word document "Russian Scientific Academy Commission works against Russia and her people!":



www.shipov.com...


Apparently a Russian Commission on Pseudoscience, was put together by a small group of academicians who stuck together.

If something challenges Newton's Laws, well, that's the end of it!

Not very scientific.




top topics



 
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join