RELEASE: The Podesta Emails Part 4 (1193 new emails)

A new day, a new set of WikiLeaks:

WikiLeaks Twitter

The hastag feed will likely be posting excerpts as they are discovered.

We know our media will not touch this or if they do it will be to deny, discredit, and deflect. Never are the issues addressed head on for if they were, even the "normal people," might begin to see through the subterfuge.

I do think that if Hillary doesn't speak to this today, people will assume she's guilty though.

With normal people, if you are accused of being a criminal, they expect you to deny it pronto.

/podesta-emails/emailid/5502

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

HERE is another busy Podesta Emails Twitter feed:
twitter.com...

I have to say I prefer the new 'Fun Size' daily 1,000+ wikileaks release...Much easier and quicker to assimilate and digest.

The only response Clinton's team has is Russia.

I'm loving our daily leaks. Thanks for keeping us up to date!

a reply to: IAMTAT

Nice analogy, hopefully these releases will continue between now and November 8th, and maybe if we're really lucky we'll get a nice Halloween bonus that will scare even those above the Clintons in the power structure.

Here's some 'debate talk,' for Clinton supporters:

Through internal discussions, we concluded that it was in our interest to: 1) limit the number of debates (and the number in each state); 2) start the debates as late as possible; 3) keep debates out of the busy window between February 1 and February 27, 2016 (Iowa to South Carolina); 4) create a schedule that would allow the later debates to be cancelled if the race is for practical purposes over; 5) encourage an emphasis on local issues and local media participants in the debate formats; and 6) ensure a format that provides equal time for all candidates and does not give the moderator any discretion to focus on one candidate.

Through discussion of these goals with the DNC their current plan is to begin a debate schedule that would commence in early October, with one debate a month, one each in the early primary and caucus states, and the remaining 2 post South Carolina (we will need to push them to post March 1 and then the later 2 debates would be cancelled if the race ends). The DNC's current plan is to release the attached press release (which lacks this specificity but confirms the number and start window for the debates). The other campaigns have advocated (not surprisingly) for more debates and for the schedule to start significantly earlier. Mo and Anita believe that this announcement prior to the actual entry into the race of other candidates will strengthen their hand as they lock a schedule in with local media partners and state parties.

/podesta-emails/emailid/5688

Now, this wouldn't be the Hillary campaign coordinating behind the scenes regarding the presidential debate, now would it?

So guys what have ya got?

Where's the dirt?

Which one takes the witch down?

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Hamburgers!

I figured this set was wrapped up when the last kit was half shy of 2,000.

Good times....

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: IAMTAT

Nice analogy, hopefully these releases will continue between now and November 8th, and maybe if we're really lucky we'll get a nice Halloween bonus that will scare even those above the Clintons in the power structure.

Here's some 'debate talk,' for Clinton supporters:

Through internal discussions, we concluded that it was in our interest to: 1) limit the number of debates (and the number in each state); 2) start the debates as late as possible; 3) keep debates out of the busy window between February 1 and February 27, 2016 (Iowa to South Carolina); 4) create a schedule that would allow the later debates to be cancelled if the race is for practical purposes over; 5) encourage an emphasis on local issues and local media participants in the debate formats; and 6) ensure a format that provides equal time for all candidates and does not give the moderator any discretion to focus on one candidate.

Through discussion of these goals with the DNC their current plan is to begin a debate schedule that would commence in early October, with one debate a month, one each in the early primary and caucus states, and the remaining 2 post South Carolina (we will need to push them to post March 1 and then the later 2 debates would be cancelled if the race ends). The DNC's current plan is to release the attached press release (which lacks this specificity but confirms the number and start window for the debates). The other campaigns have advocated (not surprisingly) for more debates and for the schedule to start significantly earlier. Mo and Anita believe that this announcement prior to the actual entry into the race of other candidates will strengthen their hand as they lock a schedule in with local media partners and state parties.

/podesta-emails/emailid/5688

Now, this wouldn't be the Hillary campaign coordinating behind the scenes regarding the presidential debate, now would it?

More proof it was rigged for her.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
So guys what have ya got?

Since the release was only recently announced, all of that is still be sifted through, however several things have been released already if you care to acknowledge any of it.

For example:

Debate scheduling
Bill making unwanted advances (one of which was to his third cousin)
Hillary's team discussing how to respond to the issuance of a subpoena
The NYDN offering space for an OpEd
More collusion against Bernie
Hillary's team discussing a 'Catholic Spring"
...and lot's more

Stay tuned for even more throughout the day.

Where's the dirt?

All over the Clintons and their coterie, not that any of it will affect your blind obedience one whit.

Which one takes the witch down?

Probably none of it as she has been ordained by powers you will not acknowledge.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
So guys what have ya got?

Where's the dirt?

Which one takes the witch down?

Check out the feed. Today it appears we get to see them bust themselves for the email server coverup snafu...

Thanks to you guys keeping ATS in the loop on this.

Talk about death by a thousand tiny pin pricks, this woman has passed 'dirty' and slid down to gutter-level filthy.

Meanwhile, where in the hell is the established media???

originally posted by: Maverick1
Thanks to you guys keeping ATS in the loop on this.

Talk about death by a thousand tiny pin pricks, this woman has passed 'dirty' and slid down to gutter-level filthy.

Meanwhile, where in the hell is the established media???

Well, according to wikileaks...kissing Hillary's backside.

what is more amazing than anything in the leaks is how the MSM has successfully convinced most liberals that the emails might not even be legitimate or original because they have been hacked and tampered with by Russians lol.....


Russia....the new boogie man.

a reply to: tribal

And you also have to remember that there is some deliberate disinfo included within the leaks. all of the garbage about aliens etc. is meant to act as obfuscation to the larger issues of what Hillary and her team get up to when they think no one is observing them.

It's called plausible deniability and gives them a small amount of wiggle room in which to assert the "leaks have been tampered with or are bogus to begin with,' argument. That wiggle room is all some need to be able to brush off the entirety of the release.

Watch how one silly poster does it in nearly all of these threads.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: tribal

And you also have to remember that there is some deliberate disinfo included within the leaks. all of the garbage about aliens etc. is meant to act as obfuscation to the larger issues of what Hillary and her team get up to when they think no one is observing them.

It's called plausible deniability and gives them a small amount of wiggle room in which to assert the "leaks have been tampered with or are bogus to begin with,' argument. That wiggle room is all some need to be able to brush off the entirety of the release.

Watch how one silly poster does it in nearly all of these threads.

Yes, 'Silly IS as Silly DOES'.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Bill sexually assaulted his 3rd cousin when she was babysitting Chelsea. Oh my,,even family members weren't safe from this creep.
I wonder how old she was at the time.

originally posted by: EchoesInTime
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Bill sexually assaulted his 3rd cousin when she was babysitting Chelsea. Oh my,,even family members weren't safe from this creep.
I wonder how old she was at the time.

But, but, but... Trump said bad things.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Why would somebody with such a stellar and clean career in gov't, want to limit the number of debates?

Not one scrap of this has been reported in the MSM here in the U.K.

We have been advised what a bad man Trump is, but even the right wing papers are refusing to comment on these e-mail dumps. Probably because the Bilderbergs have made it so, especially as they got the man they wanted going up against Clinton.

Actually one element of the e-mails have been discussed and that is the e-mails from Edgar Mitchell. Of course all reported with tongue firmly in cheek, as it usually is where ETI is discussed,

Bill Clinton is now referring to Trump supporters as Rednecks. Hillary had kind words to say about Putin saying he is "engaging", a good conversationalist.
This set of emails is very interesting. She may even lose some voters, if these emails are reported on as they should be.
I only see Fox News reporting out of the MSM so far.