It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

If you support Trump, your career is over.

page: 12
42
<< 9  10  11    13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 04:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: imjack

Most people are literally idiots with words. It's completely possible to be a Conservative Liberal Democratic Republican. They aren't false equivalents.



I've got to save this, just for posterity.

And laughs.

Sorry I interrupted your general ramblings about folks who believe in democracy ... please continue.




posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 04:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: imjack

Do you have anything to say about the Democrats or what they stand for?

Or are you just talking about democrats, generically, having nothing to do with anything in particular?

Chill out yourself, dude. I'm trying to help you out here.



My specific opinion is that Democrats literally don't stand for anything. They LITERALLY steal their policies from independents. The people in 'charge' of the party just pool massive liberty issues. They're 'supposed' to be a back-up party that will ultimately 'represent everyone', however they win way too god damned much, and no one EVER contends with the Republicans other than them, and that would be ideal because Democrats would critic them too. They're literally a political satire party, with the premise of keeping politics 'clean', as they suffocate the **** out of it.
edit on 11-10-2016 by imjack because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 04:41 PM
link   
So, again I ask ... any evidence that O'Reilly was doing anything but the usual?

Talking out his nethers?

Has anyone been fired?

Any ... I dunno ... evidence?



posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 04:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: imjack

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: imjack

Do you have anything to say about the Democrats or what they stand for?

Or are you just talking about democrats, generically, having nothing to do with anything in particular?

Chill out yourself, dude. I'm trying to help you out here.



My specific opinion is that Democrats literally don't stand for anything. They LITERALLY steal their policies from independents. The people in 'charge' of the party just pool massive liberty issues. They're 'supposed' to be a back-up party that will ultimately 'represent everyone', however they win way to god damned much, and no one EVER contends with the Republicans other than them, and that would be ideal because Democrats would critic them too. They're literally a political satire party, with the premise of keeping politics 'clean', as they suffocate the **** out of it.


AH ... there' you go ... the honesty broke though. Restores my faith in you.

I'm a registered Democrat (because there is no true left option in this country) and I can tell you that while I'm sure you are merely sharing your "opinion" about who Democrats are and what they do (not, you know, generic believers in democracy) you're mistaken based on the facts. Official party positions can be found in the Platform linked earlier.



posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 05:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Whether anyone has been fired over what O'Reilly mentioned, is yet to be seen. But yes, you can very much get fired for discussing political views at work. I know of two people (personally) who have where I work here in Texas who were #canned for discussing politics back during the Obama/Romney election.



posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 05:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: Gryphon66

Whether anyone has been fired over what O'Reilly mentioned, is yet to be seen. But yes, you can very much get fired for discussing political views at work. I know of two people (personally) who have where I work here in Texas who were #canned for discussing politics back during the Obama/Romney election.


Were these folks fired for political opinions, or for goldbricking (talking) rather than working?

There's a difference. Is there a workplace policy that bans political discussions on their property? (That's more than a little questionable, but it'd probably stand in Texas)



posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 05:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: WilburnRoach
Trump is Racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic. If you still support him you must relate to him.

If you show Racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic behavior on the job you will lose your job generally speaking.


Clinton was campaigning with Gore today who has not been above propositioning women to ease his inner manbearpig, so to speak.

So really, all of this over what Trump has said is very much feigned outrage on her part. She is married to one serial philanderer and possible rapist and campaigns openly with another. That's how much she actually cares.



posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 05:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: Gryphon66

Whether anyone has been fired over what O'Reilly mentioned, is yet to be seen. But yes, you can very much get fired for discussing political views at work. I know of two people (personally) who have where I work here in Texas who were #canned for discussing politics back during the Obama/Romney election.


Were these folks fired for political opinions, or for goldbricking (talking) rather than working?

There's a difference. Is there a workplace policy that bans political discussions on their property? (That's more than a little questionable, but it'd probably stand in Texas)


Honestly, I'm not 100% sure on which. I stayed out of it at the time. But of course there's always workplace rumors. Rumors of them stating opinions and getting fired over it. In the end, who knows. I just know it was over "Political jabber". Boss gathered us up a few days later and said to keep politics off the work site.



posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 05:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Bloodydagger

Not if you are a miner! He mentioned miners in BOTH debates. I tend to agree with Trump. Hillary will DESTROY the mining industry in this country.



posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 05:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Indigo5

Plus he apparently thinks that women can't tell the difference between reality and a book they are reading. His stupid meme is the same as accusing kids who play Grand Theft Auto of all being violent carjackers.


Can you tell the difference between saying and doing?

You contradicted yourself with your own analogy, because accusing Trump of being a sexual predator would be the same as accusing kids who play GTA of being violent carjackers.


What? Was trump reading from a book on the bus? Was he re-telling a game or a movie he had seen? Or was he describing how he can freely grope women because he thinks he is a "star".

How bad are you willing to assault reality to defend his words?



What difference, at this point, does it make?!!

You guys need a safe space. GO! lol.

Last time I was in the states, freedom of speech and ideas was the order of the day.

"what do we want?"
"dead cops!"

"when do we want it?"
"NOW!"

Now you need to stfu or lie to keep your job. It's enough to give ya nightmares.








posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 05:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Indigo5




Correct.

To be specific
"And when you're a star, you can do anything.
Whatever you want. Grab them by the P****Y
You can do anything"

Do you agree with Trump?

I'd also be interested if you agree with his view of marriage? Where he boasted about trying to sleep with a married woman shortly after he was married to Melania.


I don't agree with him. But there is no evidence he himself grabbed anyone in that manner. For one, he said "whatever you want", not "whatever I want". Perhaps someone told him that's what you can do. Perhaps he witnessed it. Either way, he admitted to flirting by using the first person. As for the whatever you want remark, it was in the second person.

He never slept with anyone, or at least there is no evidence of it. Guilty of flirting? Sure. Guilty of using lewd terms? Sure.


Hillary Clinton: Wait a minute, he flirted? DISQUALIFY HIM! No presidential candidate should have a past where they flirted with someone.



It's ok when you are potus to do anything you want.

It's NOT ok when you are a private citizen to even talk about it.

That's why Trump is getting people so upset.

That's the whole problem.

You can flirt at funerals or get a hummer in the oral office.

No problemo!




posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 06:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Bloodydagger

Right to hire, right to fire.

(Every state except Montana, for some odd reason.)

Turns out there are amazingly few protections for employees ... fewer than I would have thought.

Now, we'll see if O'Reilly was right or wrong I guess.



posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 06:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Bloodydagger

After this Election , and Donald J. Trump is our Next President , All the Members of the MSM that Have Sold their Souls to the Devil will Suffer their Self Induced Slings and Arrows of Outrageous Fortune . They Will be Cleaned from their House of Perpetual Miscontent , and Replaced by Journalist who Except the New World Order of Things , Reporting the News As Is , Without the Slants . If not , then Millions of Dollars of Future Income will be Lost , and the Word Credibility in Journalism will become just Another Oxymoron for the People to Laugh at .



posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 06:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

So ... how is that purge going to happen in the private sector?

What would the very unlikely possibility that Trump was elected have to do with purging (what you don't like) in journalism?

Are you saying he'd effect this by what ... Executive Order? Calling out the National Guard?



posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 06:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: Gryphon66

LOL, riiiiiiiiight.

Stunning response.

Breathtaking, as usual.

As to your next bit ... is there any law against firing an employee that doesn't follow directions?


I could be wrong, but I believe there's a law against firing an employee due to a conflict of interest.


Conflict of interest? You'd have to be more specific.

There's no law that tells a media company they cannot direct the nature and quality of the material that is published or broadcast. If there is, I'd like you to show it to me, because it's unconstitutional.


Well, if you're a boss with liberal ideologies and you fire an employee for having Conservative ideologies. I don't know how else to explain it. But I believe it's illegal to fire someone for a conflict of interest (a situation in which the concerns or aims of two different parties are incompatible). I'm not 100% sure, as I'm not that familiar with the law.



posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 06:18 PM
link   
a reply to: imjack

Well said.



posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 06:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Indigo5

Plus he apparently thinks that women can't tell the difference between reality and a book they are reading. His stupid meme is the same as accusing kids who play Grand Theft Auto of all being violent carjackers.


Can you tell the difference between saying and doing?

You contradicted yourself with your own analogy, because accusing Trump of being a sexual predator would be the same as accusing kids who play GTA of being violent carjackers.


Do you support Trump sexualizeing his own daughter whith Howard Stern?

www.cnn.com...

Honor and character counts in a race for the presidency. This borders on perversion. You ok with that?



More somethings out of nothing... Stern asked Trump if he could call Ivanka a POA. Obviously you've never listened to Stern. It's a guarantee he didn't mean anything by it, and Trump had appeared on his show enough to know this.


If Stern asked if he could call my daughter a piece of ass, I't put that pervert in the hospital. Trump has no honor or character. And it speaks volumes about the people that support this white trash BS.


Well, you're not Trump either. You're like most (I'd like to think) dads in America when it comes to someone talking about your kids, or family in general. However, we're not voting on Trump's past, we're voting on his policies.


No I'm not Trump. I have honor, integrity, and a sense of morals and common decency. Trump has none; you expect him to live up to what he has put up as his "policies"? He is playing you like a $5 fiddle.

The word naivete falls short of describing his followers.






Yes, I expect him to live up to his policies. If he doesn't then we end up with a Hillary Clinton anyways because her policies are the exact opposite of his. Then you'd be a happy camper, how about that.


Try and keep up. I don't know how many times I've said it but I'll say it again....

I'm not a Clinton supporter...how about that?

Is it some sort of cognitive malfunction or what. Anti Trump doesn't mean pro Clinton.


I'm not on here everyday so I've never seen you state that. I appreciate the heads up, and the smart ass attitude.

So what exactly do you stand for or support? Or who were you rooting for?



posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 06:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Indigo5

Plus he apparently thinks that women can't tell the difference between reality and a book they are reading. His stupid meme is the same as accusing kids who play Grand Theft Auto of all being violent carjackers.


Can you tell the difference between saying and doing?

You contradicted yourself with your own analogy, because accusing Trump of being a sexual predator would be the same as accusing kids who play GTA of being violent carjackers.


Do you support Trump sexualizeing his own daughter whith Howard Stern?

www.cnn.com...

Honor and character counts in a race for the presidency. This borders on perversion. You ok with that?



More somethings out of nothing... Stern asked Trump if he could call Ivanka a POA. Obviously you've never listened to Stern. It's a guarantee he didn't mean anything by it, and Trump had appeared on his show enough to know this.


If Stern asked if he could call my daughter a piece of ass, I't put that pervert in the hospital. Trump has no honor or character. And it speaks volumes about the people that support this white trash BS.


Well, you're not Trump either. You're like most (I'd like to think) dads in America when it comes to someone talking about your kids, or family in general. However, we're not voting on Trump's past, we're voting on his policies.


No I'm not Trump. I have honor, integrity, and a sense of morals and common decency. Trump has none; you expect him to live up to what he has put up as his "policies"? He is playing you like a $5 fiddle.

The word naivete falls short of describing his followers.






Yes, I expect him to live up to his policies. If he doesn't then we end up with a Hillary Clinton anyways because her policies are the exact opposite of his. Then you'd be a happy camper, how about that.


Try and keep up. I don't know how many times I've said it but I'll say it again....

I'm not a Clinton supporter...how about that?


But you HAVE to be ... none of these arguments make sense if you aren't Olaru.

You're either with 'em or agin 'em.

/s


Oh brother



posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 06:25 PM
link   
Donald Trump:

This is a man and a monster that the media built up. Before he came on the scene and was working to be a developer of real estate, he was working hard, fighting the good fight, building up his brand. However, the media helped create this monster, this man who is now running for President. They made this monster and unfortunately, they are going to have to bring him down. For years they did not print anything bad about the man, making him out to be that he could do no wrong, and it was a relationship that went hand in hand.

The saddest thing of all, about this man, is that for all of his experience, he is not seeing that people are not going to tolerate him any more than any other past presidents who would dare to try to do what he is suggesting.



posted on Oct, 11 2016 @ 06:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: LSU0408
The more people push against Trump, the bigger his support base grows. Anyone that drops off is quickly replaced by more.

Not anymore. Trump has reached the ceiling on that gravy train.


According to who? Who has the actual proof that he reached his ceiling?

Well all the polls for one. I'm curious where your proof is that the opposite is true.


Trump has raised more from small donors under $200 than any previous Republican in history.

fortune.com...

The reason the Hillary camp might be concerned is because each of those small donations represents a donor. Whereas Hillary is being funded by big banks and such, but one donor who contributes $1 million is still only one vote.

Polls can and have been skewed to show Hillary in the lead. I mean, just look at the Brexit poll that said Britons would choose to 'remain'. Eventually they fix the polls so much, they think they're going to win but they're hung out by their own corruption. A certain irony to that.

People voting with their cash would be a solid indicator.



new topics

top topics



 
42
<< 9  10  11    13  14 >>

log in

join