It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: paradoxious
originally posted by: Iamnotadoctor
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Iamnotadoctor
Anyone who watched the debate knows that he failed.
Geez, I watched, and I don't know that.
Ok.
*Anyone with moderate intelligence who watched the debate knows that he failed.
Maybe you don't know that.
Well, there's the truth. Those of "moderate" intelligence knows he failed.
Those with more than moderate intelligence, like myself, didn't know that.
originally posted by: WilburnRoach
Fox news gets it!!!
originally posted by: BiffWellington
originally posted by: underwerks
Not saying I trust polls, but I can understand why people would think Hillary won. Not everybody gets Trumps rambling word salad with no specific answers about anything.
What do you mean? He was asked a question about his purported fisting of unsuspecting women, and he gave a perfectly straightforward and unrelated answer about ISIS.
I don't see the problem.
originally posted by: Iamnotadoctor
originally posted by: paradoxious
originally posted by: Iamnotadoctor
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Iamnotadoctor
Anyone who watched the debate knows that he failed.
Geez, I watched, and I don't know that.
Ok.
*Anyone with moderate intelligence who watched the debate knows that he failed.
Maybe you don't know that.
Well, there's the truth. Those of "moderate" intelligence knows he failed.
Those with more than moderate intelligence, like myself, didn't know that.
I guess I should have clarified for types like you, that I was inferring that anyone with moderate intelligence (or more) who watched the debate knows that he failed.
(Rolls eyes)
This is how disgusting the mainstream media is. They are so desperate to make it seem as if Trump doesn't have a chance that they mislead people about the results of the very polls they say are legitimate.
The news channel, which has spent the past 14 years outstripping its cable news competition, this time bested all cable comers. In primetime, the network logged 2.37M viewers (up 26%), and 483K of them falling into the key news demo of viewers 25-54 years (up 50%). FNC’s total viewer take routed CNN’s 1.4M and MSNBC’s 888K.
Total Viewers …… 2016 ……… 2015 ………… Difference
Fox News ……….. 2.400m …. 1.754m ………….. +37%
CNN ………………. 1.435m ….. 548k …………. +162%
MSNBC ………….. 902k ……. 547k …………… +65%
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: WilburnRoach
Notice a shift since Ailes was fired?
originally posted by: TheLotLizard
originally posted by: Iamnotadoctor
originally posted by: paradoxious
originally posted by: Iamnotadoctor
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Iamnotadoctor
Anyone who watched the debate knows that he failed.
Geez, I watched, and I don't know that.
Ok.
*Anyone with moderate intelligence who watched the debate knows that he failed.
Maybe you don't know that.
Well, there's the truth. Those of "moderate" intelligence knows he failed.
Those with more than moderate intelligence, like myself, didn't know that.
I guess I should have clarified for types like you, that I was inferring that anyone with moderate intelligence (or more) who watched the debate knows that he failed.
(Rolls eyes)
I think you dug a hole for yourself and got outfoxed there buddy. It's ok we don't judge here.
I'm hoping that he puts together a website of products that we shouldn't buy. Products that CNN advertises.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Grambler
Instead of "reporting" the news, the top-echelon of the MSM attempt to SHAPE today's news, to influence the near future. In the case of polls, they create Pro-Clinton "scientific" polls, in an attempt to get more voters for Clinton. The polls are nothing more than an extension of what the MSM is doing every day to push for Hillary's election.
If Donald loses by a little bit, I'm hoping that he puts together a website of products that we shouldn't buy. Products that CNN advertises. CNN is the worse. (MSNBC is anti-Trump too, but they admit it.)
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Grambler
Instead of "reporting" the news, the top-echelon of the MSM attempt to SHAPE today's news, to influence the near future. In the case of polls, they create Pro-Clinton "scientific" polls, in an attempt to get more voters for Clinton. The polls are nothing more than an extension of what the MSM is doing every day to push for Hillary's election.
If Donald loses by a little bit, I'm hoping that he puts together a website of products that we shouldn't buy. Products that CNN advertises. CNN is the worse. (MSNBC is anti-Trump too, but they admit it.)
It's unimaginable to you that most people don't like Donald Trump, huh? And I had to lol at someone asking for snake oil Trump to tell them what products to buy in protest.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Grambler
Instead of "reporting" the news, the top-echelon of the MSM attempt to SHAPE today's news, to influence the near future. In the case of polls, they create Pro-Clinton "scientific" polls, in an attempt to get more voters for Clinton. The polls are nothing more than an extension of what the MSM is doing every day to push for Hillary's election.
If Donald loses by a little bit, I'm hoping that he puts together a website of products that we shouldn't buy. Products that CNN advertises. CNN is the worse. (MSNBC is anti-Trump too, but they admit it.)
It's unimaginable to you that most people don't like Donald Trump, huh? And I had to lol at someone asking for snake oil Trump to tell them what products to buy in protest.
Funny, you and other say that. But apparently the main stream media had to post misleading polls to try and prove that.
You know the polls they said were the standard, that we should follow. That actually showed sure Dems like Hillary, Repubs like Trump, and Independents favored Trump.
So apparently its unimaginable to you that most people don't like Hillary Clinton, and the main stream media has to mislead people about the results of polls to cover up this fact.
They'd rather bicker about Popular vote
originally posted by: imjack
originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: Grambler
Both sides of the MSM distort polls heavily. What would be interesting to see is the average of an equal amount of left and right news organizations. That would probably give us the closest true numbers.
But Trump won, imo. For the sole reason that his campaign was hanging on a thread and he bounced back high from that debate.
Too bad polls don't matter.
www.realclearpolitics.com...
You see this electorate map that does?
Clinton needs 10 electorates to win. Trump needs 105.
Basic math-
Trump has only been 1 point ahead of Clinton the entire race in Florida. Pennsylvania he's behind by 8 points. 6 points in MN, 3 points in NC, and if he loses ANY of these states it's a Clinton sweep.
If Clinton won 8 more electorates there won't even be 270 for Donald to Collect.
originally posted by: underwerks
Not to say that polls aren't rigged, but in this case I don't think they have to worry about doing that.
We’ve reached that stage of the campaign. The back-to-school commercials are on the air, and the “unskewing” of polls has begun — the quadrennial exercise in which partisans simply adjust the polls to get results more to their liking, usually with a thin sheen of math-y words to make it all sound like rigorous analysis instead of magical thinking.
If any of this sounds familiar — and if I sound a little exasperated — it’s probably because we went through this four years ago. Remember UnSkewedPolls.com? (The website is defunct, but you can view an archived picture of it here.) The main contention of that site and others like it was that the polls had too many Democratic respondents in their samples. Dean Chambers, who ran the site, regularly wrote that the polls were vastly undercounting independents and should have used a higher proportion of Republicans in their samples. But in the end, the polls underestimated President Obama’s margin.
...
But let’s say this plainly: The polls are not “skewed.” They weren’t in 2012, and they aren’t now.
originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: Grambler
Ah Yes...the good ol' "THE POLLS ARE SKEWED" excuse.
Guess what...the polls aren't skewed, they mirror reality.
Question, do you really think the voting population is split 50% Democratic and 50% Republican?
If not, why do you think polls should have equal representation?
Here is a good article about the polls and that they aren't skewed...maybe your should read up on it before you post on the topic.
The Polls Aren’t Skewed
We’ve reached that stage of the campaign. The back-to-school commercials are on the air, and the “unskewing” of polls has begun — the quadrennial exercise in which partisans simply adjust the polls to get results more to their liking, usually with a thin sheen of math-y words to make it all sound like rigorous analysis instead of magical thinking.
If any of this sounds familiar — and if I sound a little exasperated — it’s probably because we went through this four years ago. Remember UnSkewedPolls.com? (The website is defunct, but you can view an archived picture of it here.) The main contention of that site and others like it was that the polls had too many Democratic respondents in their samples. Dean Chambers, who ran the site, regularly wrote that the polls were vastly undercounting independents and should have used a higher proportion of Republicans in their samples. But in the end, the polls underestimated President Obama’s margin.
...
But let’s say this plainly: The polls are not “skewed.” They weren’t in 2012, and they aren’t now.
So, in short...this is an old trick tried by Republicans. They love polls when it shows they are winning...hey even Donald Trump admits that. But once it shows them losing...they have this insane need to make up an excuse. Saying the polls are "skewed" is one of these insane excuses.
So sorry, Trump lost the debate as all the official polls show.
I get it though...Trump won to YOU...he was talking to YOU, his supporters, because he had to appeal to them so he didn't lose their support too. So to you, Trump won...and to all his most devoted supporters, he won. But to everyone else, he lost...it wasn't even close.
Here's some advice, your opinion doesn't always match reality. And instead of trying to change reality, you should just accept that you are in the minority.
This is skewed, period.