It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Producer Says There's Footage of Trump Saying the N-Word

page: 8
54
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Indigo5


????

Trump wasn't "joking"...Even he hasn't said he was "joking"?


I didn't say he said it was a joke. I said I have made bad jokes that have offensive material.

Trump said he didn't do the things he mentioned in the clip. He was just engaging in lockeroom talk.

Are you offended when Hillary was accusing a 12 year old girl that had been raped of engaging in fantasys with older men? She never said that was a joke.


Clinton's smearing of a 12 year old rape victim is particularly nasty.


BS

SNOPES: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist
www.snopes.com...


Yeah, let's not believe the actual victim talking and telling us what happened and what Hillary did... let's believe Snopes.


Snopes is a joke propaganda site used by liberals who pretend it's the oracle.



You should actually read what snopes posted. They source the court documents and the audio tapes that back-up their findings.


I'll repeat, Snopes is a joke site, totally discredited.
I did look at it though and in no way does it disprove the actual victims claims that Clinton said she sought out older men.


It precisely disproves just that, with court documents and all..

Strange denial of reality here...




posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: Indigo5
And this...



David Brock: I will pay for 'Apprentice' tapes
David Brock is volunteering to pay for the legal fees of any "Apprentice" producer or staff member who may have their hands on potentially damaging tapes of Donald Trump.
www.politico.com...


They are breaking NDAs in order to score political points.

Are you proud of this behavior from what is supposed to be a fair and objective press?


Yes.

3 years and 45K+ emails were scrutinized of Hillary Clinton's, apart every other facet of her life big or small...Hacked DNC Email servers etc. etc.

The idea that things Trump says whilst a microphone is wired to his lapel is somehow off limits is bizarrely disingenuous.


Throwing contractual obligations to the wind in order to score political points undermines the law.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

so what?



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Indigo5


????

Trump wasn't "joking"...Even he hasn't said he was "joking"?


I didn't say he said it was a joke. I said I have made bad jokes that have offensive material.

Trump said he didn't do the things he mentioned in the clip. He was just engaging in lockeroom talk.

Are you offended when Hillary was accusing a 12 year old girl that had been raped of engaging in fantasys with older men? She never said that was a joke.


Clinton's smearing of a 12 year old rape victim is particularly nasty.


BS

SNOPES: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist
www.snopes.com...


Yeah, let's not believe the actual victim talking and telling us what happened and what Hillary did... let's believe Snopes.


Snopes is a joke propaganda site used by liberals who pretend it's the oracle.



You should actually read what snopes posted. They source the court documents and the audio tapes that back-up their findings.


I'll repeat, Snopes is a joke site, totally discredited.
I did look at it though and in no way does it disprove the actual victims claims that Clinton said she sought out older men.


It precisely disproves just that, with court documents and all..

Strange denial of reality here...


No, it really doesn't. Stay off snopes for a while. It's bad for ones understanding of the world.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

You should actually read what snopes posted. They source the court documents and the audio tapes that back-up their findings.


You are absolutely right that no matter how biased you think a source is, you should read the content. I have done just that.

So Hillary was in charge of the defense. As the person in charge, she called a psychiatrist that claimed the girl was fantasizing about have a relationship with an older man. She knew what she was doing, and she knew what this doctor would say. And yet she still chose to make this argument through her witness.

Not only that, she then encouraged the court to have the 12 year old girl underbgo a psychiatric evaluation to attenpt to prove that she did have these fantasies.


That affidavit doesn't show, as claimed, that Hillary Clinton asserted the defendant "made up the rape story because [she] enjoyed fantasizing about men"; rather, it shows that other people, including an expert in child psychology, had said that the complainant was "emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and to engage in fantasizing about persons, claiming they had attacked her body," and that "children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences." Clinton therefore asked the court to have the complainant undergo a psychiatric exam (at the defense's expense) to determine the validity of that information:


www.snopes.com...

So snopes says that this was a lie because she didn't personally say the girl fanatsized about having sex with older men but instead got an witness to say it for her, and then wanted to have the girl to under go an evaluation to prove it.

What a joke.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:44 PM
link   
>Snopes
>News

Pick one.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Indigo5

So it is ok to pay for legal fees for this to BREAK the law but to pay for legal fees for someone who attends a rally is deplorable?


Paying legal fees for someone to break an NDA for a reality show so we can better screen a candidate for President of the United States? Sure...

Paying legal fees to a man that calls an African American N***** while sucker punching him on the way out of a rally?

Sure..I guess Trump can do it...but it says something about him.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Indigo5

so what?


Hey Burd...

Very likely this is not going to be the last Hot Mic moment trump needs to explain..that's what.

Or did you miss that part?



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
I bet plenty of posters in this thread have actually said the N-word in some fashion. I have before. So have you.



True. That is why we need to know the context in which it was said.


Doesn't matter, because plenty of Liberal PC snowflakes out there think that the N-Word is inappropriate in ALL manners in which its used.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ohanka
>Snopes
>News

Pick one.


As far as politics goes, I trust Snopes about as far as I can throw them because its a Left Leaning Liberal website.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5




??? Yes...I will believe SNOPES over what the right wing media claims this girl said...more so since it has now been shown that Trump paid these women to sit beside him and say the things they said.

BTW - Snopes? They cite ACTUAL COURT DOCS
Are you suggesting that the court documents from 40 years ago were falsified in case Hillary ran for President?

Honestly...what is wrong with you people? Allergic to truth? Widespread BS infection of the brain?

Court docs (Linked at SNOPES)
www.scribd.com...


As I have shown, all the snopes article shows is that Hillary got a psychiatrist to claim this girl fantasized about having sex with older men, and then she personally petitioned the court to make the girl undergo an evaluation to prove this.

So yes, as the lawyer, she was the one that made the decision to introduce the argument that she fantasized about having sex with older men. And she the personally wanted this rape victim evaluated to prove this.

So you are ok with Hillary doing this to that 12 year old girl?

Now as Introvert and others have said, just refusing to look at a source because you tihink they are biased is terrible. Yet that is all you do when you claim you don't trust anything in the right wing media.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:49 PM
link   
At first I thought the election might be close, but I had no idea how deep the dirt would go or how the candidates would react. Hillary has done so many bad things, it can't be overlooked anymore. Her email server scandal, her mishandling of Benghazi, twisting of the facts to support her narrative, exploitive speaking fees and questionable uses of the Clinton Foundation for political or enterprise ends instead of charity (only 15% is charity--rest is in-house) and so on. And yet Trump is 10 times worse than her, maybe 100 times. People are going to vote this time who haven't voted for a long time. We're going to see Hillary win by a big margin; if not the electoral map then the popular vote.

People have seen Trump and know this is more than about just voting for the next president, this is about preserving the heart and soul of government. It's a line in the sand. Vote for the unqualified sexist bigot Putin sympathiser who might have raped a 13 year old girl, who's history is of slapping his name on buildings, dealing in real estate, owning major beauty pageant organizations, owning casinos and producing, hosting and participating in television shows--scarcely the experience needed for being president. Or vote for Hillary, a former secretary of state and junior senator for New York State 2001-2009, possessing an upstanding history all through her life, and unlike Trump, is well mannered, professional and won't attract widespread outrage or distrust. Yes, Hillary is not the perfect candidate, as I outlined at the beginning, but next to Trump she's a demigod. Allowing Trump to win would be like throwing our nation to the wolves, as opposed to doing what's tried and true. If none of that makes sense to you, then ask who's the best example for our kids?
edit on 10/10/2016 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:50 PM
link   
Lets do a Snopes style assessment:

SNOPES : Hillary Clinton did not volunteer to be the defendant's lawyer - likely true, she was probably assigned the case

SNOPES : she did not laugh about the case's outcome - FALSE... she did , I heard on tape, so I really don;t care about a silly website denying reality.

SNOPES : she did not assert that the complainant "made up the rape story," - PARTLY FALSE

SNOPES : she did not claim she knew the defendant to be guilty - FALSE, she absolutely did, on tape discussing how she lost faith in lie detector tests because he passed

SNOPES : and she did not "free" the defendant. - FALSE, she boasted about it on tape.

So SNOPES' rating on this one... total bull# as usual.

Note they didn't even assess whether Hillary smeared a 12 yr old rape victim by saying she basically deserved it for her history of going after older men. They just made up some waffle about Hillary ordering an evaluation after a previous evaluation. Perhaps they just forgot, or left out the specifics so they could place their lies more easily.

Sorry, chaps, but your useless 'fact' checker sites like snopes no longer work in debates. They are totally debunked.
edit on 10/10/2016 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

No, but apparently my point is being missed... he doesn't have anything to explain. This one, particularly, is a real "so what" if it proves to be true. The entirety of the *ahem* "n-word" outrage is ridiculous butthurt over a damn word. Not enough Americans care for this to impact this race in any way.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:55 PM
link   
a reply to: TheKnightofDoom

You don't get it. The Trump campaign said 'after' an old man hit another man who was giving everyone the finger and yelling slurs that they would pay for his lawyers.

The head of the Clinton campaign is telling people he will pay for them to commit crimes. You are ok with that?



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:56 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

This is why Snopes isn't worth reading: You have to factcheck everything they claim.

From now on, I'll be skipping them and doing my own factchecking of rumors. Which, btw, is all this OP is, right now.
edit on 10-10-2016 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: UKTruth

This is why Snopes isn't worth ereading: You have to factcheck everything they claim.

From now on, I'll be skipping them and doing my own factchecking of rumors. Which, btw, is all this OP is, right now.


Snopes is bunk when it comes to politics.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

No...The girl was examined by a Psychiatrist at the University of Ark. whose determination was that she had made accusations against older men in the past and had engaged in fantasies about older men.

Hillary didn't "get" that psychiatrist to come to those conclusions..nor did she say that, the psychiatrist did.

Now that you have read the SNOPES and presumably the court Docs?

Do you dispute either of the following?

Hillary repeatedly said she did not want to represent the defendant, made calls and tried to get out of it, but was obligated to.

She got her client (defendant) to admit guilt and plead guilty.

Either of those things not true in your world?



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: Grambler

Thing is pointing out both candidates bad things is the correct thing to do.....I just can not understand how you all have not burnt it all down yet? I mean really Trump and Clinton? hang em and start again.



As far as burning it down, thats why Trump is getting my vote. I am tired of the establishment. Hillary Trump seems bad, but so was Obama Romney, Bush Kerry, Clinton Bush, etc.



Honest story - I knew an alcoholic that got diagnosed with Cirrhosis of the Liver. His doctors told him he would have to get a liver transplant, but first he would have to sober up for 3 months to be eligible. He decided instead to double down and began each day with a rum and coke for breakfast. He spent his last weeks yellow and puffed up in his easy chair on morphine. His liver unable to process anything, everything he drank or ate was poisoning him. I watched him die.

Explain to me how you go from being unhappy with dishonesty and corruption in gov. to electing Trump as a "solution".




You are making an assumption.
You are assuming that your addicted friend wanted, in fact to survive and deal with the pain and complications of a liver transplant. Obviously they did not and chose to just double down.

You are also assuming that those of us supporting Trump want the current political creature parasitically feeding off this country to survive. Trump is not a candidate, he is a murder weapon. I will not be voting since I gave that up years ago but I hope he wins and the creature dies a horrible bloody and rope filled death.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:59 PM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs

Boths sides are as guilty both sides are hypocrites are you okay with this?.



new topics

top topics



 
54
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join