It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Producer Says There's Footage of Trump Saying the N-Word

page: 12
54
<< 9  10  11    13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 04:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Indigo5

Snopes is not credible. They've been exposed for the propaganda machine that they are: link

They peddle rumors...they don't debunk them.


This ^^^

The left uses Snopes as often as they use Huffington Post and Mother Jones. All biased.


100% Fact




posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 04:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth



The girl was 12. It is not reasonable to use a defence like 'she asked for it'. Again, she was 12 FFS. Children at that age don't know what the hell is going on. To pursue a defence that she 'sought out older men' is utterly sick. It doesn't matter in the slightest even if she was asking the guy to do what he did. It's still rape when it's a 12 year old.


Unless he didn't do it.



Stop with the stupidity of hiding behind due process. This is nothing to do with due process. Regardless of the mental state of the CHILD, this is not a valid defence.


Due process is at the heart of our justice system. There is a reason for that and that is because it protects the system and the innocent from emotional knee-jerkers such as yourself.



Hillary is sick for doing it and demonstrated she cares nothing about children - one of her self proclaimed FAKE strengths.


Hillary did her job.


Whether he did it or not, a defence centred on a 12 year old girl 'seeking out older men' is not relevant to establish whether he committed rape and has no bearing on guilt or innocence.

Hillary smeared a child as a slut so she could win a case. Plain and simple. Disgusting.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 04:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: Indigo5


Emmy Award-winning producer Chris Nee alleged Sunday on Twitter that Apprentice producers are sitting on footage that includes film of Donald Trump using the n-word.

Nee made the comments in response to a former producer on the show, who tweeted Saturday that Trump has been caught on camera saying “far worse” than the things he said in the Access Hollywood footage.

theslot.jezebel.com...

The rub is that the Producers say that they all signed an NDA with a $5M dollar penalty if they leak anything.

The question is ...will Mark Cuban or others pony up the money?

GoFundMe Created To Pay Legal Fees For Trump Leakers
www.refinery29.com...


This is exactly the kind of crap we can expect the media to fabricate and lie about for the next 30 days. I suspect it will get worse.


?????

What has the media fabricated?

Trump on the bus? Trump on Howard Stern talking about his daughter being a "piece of ass"?

Curious what you think the media has fabricated here.


Fabricated Trump saying the "n word." You don't know if he did, the media don't know if he did. A rumor pops out 30 days before the election and the media jumps all over it, as do all Trump haters.



originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: UKTruth
I have heard that this exists too, but I will wait and see if it is true. The ONLY way it becomes believable and worth anything is if the video is shown.
That said, why would this rumour be coming out now? He's been battling people for a year and 4 months... you'd think it would have already surfaced - at least the rumour of it.

It should also be said that there are allegations of Bill using the n-word and Hillary abusing the disabled and Jews.


And IF it's true, should it even matter if it wasn't directed at a black person? It's just a word.


Not true? Just rumor...but if true...doesn't matter?

Understood.

Good luck in coming weeks.

This might very well be just a rumor, but we both know it is a very plausible one.

Honestly?...Trump is slowly bleeding out either way. The GOP will be lucky to drag his carcass across the finish line without losing the house and senate to boot.


Do you honestly think that a person is a racist for saying that word? People have been chastised so long for it that you can hear kids blurt it out when they're playing online video games and their parents aren't in earshot because they think it's cool to cuss. It's just a word, and like I said, if it wasn't directed at a black person, why is it a big deal? Further, why wasn't it a big deal until now?

How about this, if it's true, I'll take it as serious as people take a black calling a white person a cracker. Fair enough?


Do you know the origin of the word "cracker"..It wasn't a slur, it was "whip cracker" referring to the white men in charge of the plantation.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 04:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: UKTruth
I have heard that this exists too, but I will wait and see if it is true. The ONLY way it becomes believable and worth anything is if the video is shown.
That said, why would this rumour be coming out now? He's been battling people for a year and 4 months... you'd think it would have already surfaced - at least the rumour of it.

It should also be said that there are allegations of Bill using the n-word and Hillary abusing the disabled and Jews.


And IF it's true, should it even matter if it wasn't directed at a black person? It's just a word.



I have to ask...but am afraid to...How would Trump use the N-Word but not be referencing a black person?


Boy, you must live under a damn rock. Whites call whites N-gga all the time. The N-word is just another word for "Bro" to some people. The N-Word doesn't always reference a black person. It became a trendy word for inner city kids (WHITES TOO) during the whole gangster rap hip hop era of the late 1990s and early 2000s.
edit on 10-10-2016 by Bloodydagger because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 04:37 PM
link   
Surely this is just faux outrage?

Or is everyone the flipping Dalai lama now and never said a bad thing about anyone?

How is at some point in your life calling someone a n***** any worse than calling someone a Bast****? After all, no kid has any control over whether its parents are married, just as they never had any control over what skin colour they had?


Seems like no one actually cares that much, but just see this as a useful stick to beat someone with.


If you are really that sensitive about this, then both candidates have said things and acted in ways which mean you shouldn't want either one of them, surely?



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 04:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: UKTruth
I have heard that this exists too, but I will wait and see if it is true. The ONLY way it becomes believable and worth anything is if the video is shown.
That said, why would this rumour be coming out now? He's been battling people for a year and 4 months... you'd think it would have already surfaced - at least the rumour of it.

It should also be said that there are allegations of Bill using the n-word and Hillary abusing the disabled and Jews.


And IF it's true, should it even matter if it wasn't directed at a black person? It's just a word.



I have to ask...but am afraid to...How would Trump use the N-Word but not be referencing a black person?


One thing we can all bet on is that he didn't say he hates n*****s or speak in a derogatory tone and call blacks that.


Why on earth would anyone bet on that?

He was sued TWICE for not renting to African Americans...the first time he settled and then kept discriminating.

No one here would be shocked if he was using the N-word to refer to some Black person he didn't like..or he might have dropped it hopping to impress someone like Billy Bush...

It might not be proven yet, but it sure is plausible..



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 04:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: UKTruth
I have heard that this exists too, but I will wait and see if it is true. The ONLY way it becomes believable and worth anything is if the video is shown.
That said, why would this rumour be coming out now? He's been battling people for a year and 4 months... you'd think it would have already surfaced - at least the rumour of it.

It should also be said that there are allegations of Bill using the n-word and Hillary abusing the disabled and Jews.


And IF it's true, should it even matter if it wasn't directed at a black person? It's just a word.



I have to ask...but am afraid to...How would Trump use the N-Word but not be referencing a black person?


Boy, you must live under a damn rock. Whites call whites N-gga all the time. The N-word is just another word for "Bro" to some people. The N-Word doesn't always reference a black person. It became a trendy word for inner city kids (WHITES TOO) during the whole gangster rap hip hop era of the late 1990s and early 2000s.


So...You think trump dropped the N-Word as hip-hop gangsta in the 1990's?

Start practicing that defense now for when the tape comes out..



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 04:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

No, but i'm saying the N-Word is universal and used in many ways and contexts in cultures you have zero clue about. You seem extremely ignorant and shortsighted on the subject.
edit on 10-10-2016 by Bloodydagger because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 04:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigo5
Do you know the origin of the word "cracker"..It wasn't a slur, it was "whip cracker" referring to the white men in charge of the plantation.


Ummm, did they say cracker lovingly?

It's definitely a slur.

No one's gonna call it the C word anytime soon, and as a cracker myself I don't find it offensive and use the term often but it's still a slur. No different to peckerwood, whitebread or honky.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 04:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: MotherMayEye



Which I find disgusting and I am actually surprised that Hillary introduced the argument. I used to be a Hillary supporter once


Hillary did not introduce the argument. She was told that she had a history of making such accusations.


No. It was not a direct quote in her motion. She paraphrased whatever she was told. She said she was informed the claimant had made false accusations about people attacking her body. Very, very vague. Did she once lie and say her brother "hit her first" in an argument?

Hillary framed the argument to suit a motion to have the child undergo a psychological examination.

We actually have NO IDEA what Hillary was told. I imagine she used every teeny tiny bit of evidence (hearsay) that she could find to support her motion.
edit on 10-10-2016 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 05:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

Here where I live calling an african negro is the correct way, if you call them black they (some of them) get offended.

I´ve never been offended by someone calling me white or light. Never understood why blacks get offended. (some of them...)



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 05:13 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth



a defence centred on a 12 year old girl 'seeking out older men' is not relevant to establish whether he committed rape and has no bearing on guilt or innocence.


Do you not think it's important to ask for an evaluation of a girl that may of had a history of making false allegations and may have been mentally unstable? Isn't that an important part of the case?



Hillary smeared a child as a slut so she could win a case. Plain and simple. Disgusting.


Can you prove the case was centered around this aspect and not other evidences in the case? Also, can you honestly say that if someone were to accuse you of such an act and they also may of had a history of making false allegations/mental instability, that you would not want that avenue to be looked-at in your defense?

Your assertions are ridiculous and emotional.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 05:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: MotherMayEye



Which I find disgusting and I am actually surprised that Hillary introduced the argument. I used to be a Hillary supporter once


Hillary did not introduce the argument. She was told that she had a history of making such accusations.


No. It was not a direct quote in her motion. She paraphrased whatever she was told. She said she was informed the claimant had made false accusations about people attacking her body. Very, very vague. Did she once lie and say her brother "hit her first" in an argument?

Hillary framed the argument to suit a motion to have the child undergo a psychological examination.

We actually have NO IDEA what Hillary was told. I imagine she used every teeny tiny bit of evidence (hearsay) that she could find to support her motion.


Throw in the fact the girl was 12. Even if she did seek out older men or have some mental disorder it's still rape. So Hillary put the girl through the eval. for nothing. Probably her vindictive nature coming out.
edit on 10/10/2016 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 05:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: MotherMayEye



Which I find disgusting and I am actually surprised that Hillary introduced the argument. I used to be a Hillary supporter once


Hillary did not introduce the argument. She was told that she had a history of making such accusations.


No. It was not a direct quote in her motion. She paraphrased whatever she was told. She said she was informed the claimant had made false accusations about people attacking her body. Very, very vague. Did she once lie and say her brother "hit her first" in an argument?

Hillary framed the argument to suit a motion to have the child undergo a psychological examination.

We actually have NO IDEA what Hillary was told. I imagine she used every teeny tiny bit of evidence (hearsay) that she could find to support her motion.


As would be her job. It would be correct of her to explore every avenue in their defense.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 05:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth



a defence centred on a 12 year old girl 'seeking out older men' is not relevant to establish whether he committed rape and has no bearing on guilt or innocence.


Do you not think it's important to ask for an evaluation of a girl that may of had a history of making false allegations and may have been mentally unstable? Isn't that an important part of the case?



Hillary smeared a child as a slut so she could win a case. Plain and simple. Disgusting.


Can you prove the case was centered around this aspect and not other evidences in the case? Also, can you honestly say that if someone were to accuse you of such an act and they also may of had a history of making false allegations/mental instability, that you would not want that avenue to be looked-at in your defense?

Your assertions are ridiculous and emotional.


I'l leave you to defend Hillary slut shaming a 12 year old. Yuk.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 05:19 PM
link   
I'm still lost that people really care. I guess I'm just mentally toast. N word really how about just saying 'n-word'. That's the word right?? N word makes you look STUPID. Grow up




posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 05:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: MotherMayEye



Which I find disgusting and I am actually surprised that Hillary introduced the argument. I used to be a Hillary supporter once


Hillary did not introduce the argument. She was told that she had a history of making such accusations.


No. It was not a direct quote in her motion. She paraphrased whatever she was told. She said she was informed the claimant had made false accusations about people attacking her body. Very, very vague. Did she once lie and say her brother "hit her first" in an argument?

Hillary framed the argument to suit a motion to have the child undergo a psychological examination.

We actually have NO IDEA what Hillary was told. I imagine she used every teeny tiny bit of evidence (hearsay) that she could find to support her motion.


As would be her job. It would be correct of her to explore every avenue in their defense.


I do not disagree with that. The defendant is entitled to a lawyer that defends him.

I am just shocked that Hilary would put a kid through the claims in the motion to compel the court to grant a psychological examination and the actual exam.

It was unnecessary and intimidating. That's clear by the lasting impression it left on this woman.

Hillary flexed her legal muscles on a kid that was a victim of rape, needlessly. That's all I take from this story. It's not pretty, but, no, it doesn't change my mind that defendants have the right to a competent defense.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 05:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

I don't think it will matter to his deplorable base. His base isn't enough to win anything.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 05:29 PM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye



Hillary flexed her legal muscles on a kid that was a victim of rape, needlessly. That's all I take from this story. It's not pretty, but, no, it doesn't change my mind that defendants have the right to a competent defense.


If the person making the claim has a history of making false accusations like this and is known to be mentally unstable, it is not unreasonable to ask for an evaluation. And a physical exam in such cases are common and/or mandatory. Ever heard of a rape kit?

Hillary did her job as a defense attorney, despite her not wanting the case, and she did what was reasonable in his defense.

This is being blown way out of proportion for nothing more than political partisanship.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 05:32 PM
link   
Fact is this: If Trumps words were put to music and rapped by Lil Wayne, America would be paying to buy it off ITunes. The outrage from our Nation who listens to "filth" as entertainment, is laughable and hypocritical.
edit on 10-10-2016 by Bloodydagger because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
54
<< 9  10  11    13  14 >>

log in

join