It's time we talk about the simple truth in this election

Hillary Clinton is business as usual for this country. What that means is a slow decline into becoming a third world nation. Our country is being stripped and sold out to the rest of the world physically, spiritually and mentally. If the current business continues as usual, we will be living in a "has-been" free nation. We will be living in a cess pit of immoral sycophantic, soul sucking behavior; where we eat poison food, entertain our brains with any form of distracting stimulation we can find that still engages pleasure, and we watch our future turn to a living nightmare.

There is no way that Hillary, who after so many years as a politician is going to make any changes in direction for this country. We are deeply in debt and we are teetering on the edge of being physically and morally bankrupt. This is what a globalist like Hillary wants for America. To strip her and sell her. They see America like a used up sex abuse victim that they can continue to abuse until there is nothing left. Eventually their desire is to totally enslave our physical beings and our spirits.

Hillary Clinton is actively engaged in a drive to start a physical war with Russia the likes of which will temporarily destroy our planet. The only reason she wants to be elected as president is to ensure this nation is used up, sold out and destroyed. It's important to realize the simple truth of the choices we face in this election. Guaranteed death or a Possible revitalization.

Trump is far from perfect, but he is at the very least not actively trying to sell and destroy our entire nation. He's the only chance we have at this time to stop our country from being sold and eventually destroyed. He's a fool, yes; a braggart, yes; selfish, of course; but the one thing he is not is everything Hillary Clinton is: a globalist.

Clinton will tell you anything to get into the office so she can carry out the deed. She is proud to deceive and 100% willing to laugh in our faces as she slits our throats. Whatever she talks about is just talking points and rhetoric used to hypnotize and confuse us in order to get elected. What she is actually running for is to continue business as usual which means the end of America and a terrible future for our children.

a reply to: Socrato

Looks like Trump supporters are starting to reach the final stage of grief. Acceptance. Too bad acceptance has to come with a long diatribe about how Clinton will supposedly ruin the US complete with zero evidence to back up the claims.

a reply to: Socrato

Some people on ATS puzzle me. You are on what is known as the world wide web, on a site with members world wide and you decry globalism.

Trump has many buildings, businesses and interests across the world, yet you state he is not a globalist.

One of Trumps aides said over the weekend that a Trump government would be looking to make a trade deal with the UK......... isn't that globalist?

You might want to think about a word often used by Trump fans as almost an insult, without seeming to know what it actually means. Here, this may help as a definition...

The development of social, cultural, technological, or economic networks that transcend national boundaries; globalization.

www.thefreedictionary.com...

In reality, would you rather have an isolationist approach? If you think that's what Trump is offering, then it seems to be another case of him not practicing what he preaches.

Uh...no.

Trump has a history of bad judgement. Ask anyone from NY or particularly Atlantic City.

He is the son of a politician, been a lobbyist his whole career, was a democrat, constantly lies in arguements, is the most divisive politician in recent American history, wants to trample the constitution, and a whole host of other terrible attributes.

Just because Hillary is a lying scumbag in no way means Trump isnt.

He is scum. I hated him when he was a democrat, I hate him as a republican.

This is soley about Donald Trump and his legacy. The guy doesn't have the ability to do anything for anybody but himself.

And anyone who talks sexually about their own daughter has some serious moral impairment.

a reply to: uncommitted

A globalist as I'm referring to it here is a person whos goal is dissolving sovereign nations of which the USA is one. It is a person who is working for interests other than the country which they are a citizen of.


Independent nations can still trade and develop networks but must retain their own identity and sovereignty.

I actually hope she wins but I'm voting Trump. Financially it is better for me if people stay poor and ignorant but I know I'm just being selfish and greedy. If she wins at least I can have a good conscience about it. I tried to do what is best for Americans but it did not work out for 70% of them again.

originally posted by: Socrato
a reply to: uncommitted

A globalist as I'm referring to it here is a person whos goal is dissolving sovereign nations of which the USA is one. It is a person who is working for interests other than the country which they are a citizen of.


Independent nations can still trade and develop networks but must retain their own identity and sovereignty.

That's great, but it's not really an acknowledged definition of a globalist.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

In 1998 there was zero evidence to back up the claims that Chavez would screw up the Venezuelan economy.

Not being from the US, I'm still following the election process with great interest. It's a mystery to me how America got stuck with these two candidates.

I was wondering, isn't there a process in which the American public can stop these elections and restart the election process?

If the election process could be "redone", do you think that at the end we would have again these 2 candidates?

a reply to: Socrato

While I may agree or disagree with your statements, I fail to find logic in participating in a system of which I vote for the lesser of evils. I refuse to vote red or blue, no matter the face of the franchise, and vote 3rd party until they're tyrannical influences are deemed to less influential to the democratic processes of voting. It's not a 50/50 choice, yet the masses continue on... stuck in the red/blue void to failure.

A bunch of gangsters... the Pubs and the Crits... pitiful that they get voted in by Americans!

Simple truth is, none of them are worthy of running your country or any other.

Ok we've all got many flaws, as do they, more so than us,,, were not running for president and not in the elite circle of world affairs so makes us judge who's the best candidate.

Now Hillery has her scandals going on/her past plus new stuff etc (no angel) by any means, Trump has bad business judgement but has had success and failure, he's racist and judgemental to others who are not American, oh forgot he is as well but he is good at saying things that are in some way "true",,, Anyway whoever is chosen will lie and bring you down or lie and do what they claim.

Ether way it's not going to be an easy ride for America and the world.

originally posted by: TheBandit795
a reply to: Krazysh0t

In 1998 there was zero evidence to back up the claims that Chavez would screw up the Venezuelan economy.

I had to star you for that. Now, which candidate is basing their run entirely on their charismatic personality like Chavez?

a reply to: UFOtoday

We got stuck with them for a couple of reasons. The biggest one though is Americans are fat, lazy, poor and stupid and that's being nice. There is only about 30% of the population that could withstand being unemployed or no income for more than a few weeks. They also don't want to improve their situation or pay for anything themselves. Not willing to make any sacrifices in life. Content on working crap jobs for crap wages as long as they can get their new smartphone and have cable TV or Netflix.

The second issue is the enablers that encourage this lifestyle which is the government. They promise these people the world and they believe it every 4 years even though none of their promises every manifest into reality. If the people get too upset the government throws them a small amount of money to shut them up in some form of welfare or tax credit. That is how our system works. In summary, no accountability. Just promise people whatever they want. Tell them whatever they want to hear and then back stab them and throw them free money to remain on the ground.

originally posted by: TheBandit795
a reply to: Krazysh0t

In 1998 there was zero evidence to back up the claims that Chavez would screw up the Venezuelan economy.

Is that the flimsy excuse you are using to back up 100% speculation without evidence?

It's delusional to think Trump is anything less than Globalist as well, given that he will shamelessly do anything to maximize profits at the expense of others - just like a Globalist. And beyond that, he is a pathological authoritarian bully who may well practice brutal power grabs or a complete dismissal of core constitutional rights.

Whether by bullet or slow poison, the U.S. is screwed with this false dichotomy of an election. Trump or Clinton both represent a Globalist win, regardless.

originally posted by: Socrato
a reply to: uncommitted

A globalist as I'm referring to it here is a person whos goal is dissolving sovereign nations of which the USA is one. It is a person who is working for interests other than the country which they are a citizen of.


Independent nations can still trade and develop networks but must retain their own identity and sovereignty.

This looks like a cheap attempt to move the goal posts back. You can't change the definition of words to suit your narrative.

originally posted by: UFOtoday
Not being from the US, I'm still following the election process with great interest. It's a mystery to me how America got stuck with these two candidates.

I was wondering, isn't there a process in which the American public can stop these elections and restart the election process?

If the election process could be "redone", do you think that at the end we would have again these 2 candidates?

Republicans and Democrats have done a fantastic job of brainwashing the people into voting against the other guy rather than for someone they believe in.

That is how we have ended up with the options we got... though to be honest it doesnt matter who wins congress isnt fixed so the people are still screwed.

originally posted by: TheBandit795
a reply to: Krazysh0t

In 1998 there was zero evidence to back up the claims that Chavez would screw up the Venezuelan economy.

Except that socialist dictators always screw up the economy.

a reply to: Socrato

Donny boy is that you? LOL.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

I'm just pointing out the flaw in your logic. There was zero evidence back then, although if you actually took a good look at the situation back then, you would realize would be inevitable. But evidence usually comes after the fact.

Btw.. Hillary will do nothing about International bankers creating money out of thin air, just like Obama, Bush, her husband, Bush, Reagan, Carter, Ford etc... did. So she will contribute to the screwing up of the economy.