It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Trump easily wins 2nd debate MSM trying to spin it against him.

page: 7
97
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 11:58 PM
link   
a reply to: RomeByFire

Keep telling everyone they're stupid; it seems to work.



+2 more 
posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 11:59 PM
link   
a reply to: hounddoghowlie



i would like to point out that tonight is not the first time trump said he would appoint a special prosecutor.

The President can't appoint a special prosecutor.
Trump did not say that he will, tonight. I don't know about before. Maybe he learned something.




edit on 10/9/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 11:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Grambler



I showed how that if she didn't deny it, and instead said it was good when Lincoln did it, that implies she is also a fan of having one plan in public, and another in private.
That is not what she said.


Oh? Well what was your interpretation then, since those seem to carry weight in a non-fallacious way now.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: interupt42

Wow, so hillary and you guys think she sucks so bad, that she is afraid of doing even worse than being neck to neck with trump, that a last minute candidate would kill her.?



Don't think - - just read the words.



Did you really say that,lol.

Well that really sums up the hillary kool-aid drip line doesn't it.

Don't think just read,lol

edit on 091031America/ChicagoMon, 10 Oct 2016 00:09:51 -0500000000p3142 by interupt42 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

And where did said poster say in this thread "I am a Hillary Clinton supporter?" because I'm having a hard time finding it.

Biased? How, exactly? For being anti-Trump?

So people can't have an opinion with being biased? Who is the one being biased here?



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Grambler




But Hillary is admitting to our face that she lies to the public.

Where?



You know normally I really like your post Phage, but you are being purposefully obtuse. I posted a post about Hillarys answering of the two faced question. I showed how her defence of saying she has different policies than what she tells the public was just saying Lincoln did it and it was good.

I showed how that if she didn't deny it, and instead said it was good when Lincoln did it, that implies she is also a fan of having one plan in public, and another in private. I showed examples of how she or her camp have been shown saying different things in public and private.

I asked if that worried her supporters. You responded with a question without answering the question.

I answer your question and again ask you to answer. You now act like you don't know what I am talking about.

Thats ok Phage, people can see how biased you are being.


Beat me to it. Maybe it was a realllllllly long pee.

Maybe you missed where I didn't take a pee.

edit on 10/10/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Grambler




But Hillary is admitting to our face that she lies to the public.

Where?


You know normally I really like your post Phage, but you are being purposefully obtuse. I posted a post about Hillarys answering of the two faced question. I showed how her defence of saying she has different policies than what she tells the public was just saying Lincoln did it and it was good.

I showed how that if she didn't deny it, and instead said it was good when Lincoln did it, that implies she is also a fan of having one plan in public, and another in private. I showed examples of how she or her camp have been shown saying different things in public and private.

I asked if that worried her supporters. You responded with a question without answering the question.

I answer your question and again ask you to answer. You now act like you don't know what I am talking about.

Thats ok Phage, people can see how biased you are being.


Maybe he just needs time for all the bruises left by Hillary's downfall tonight to heal.

They all tuned in to see Trump skewered and barbequed, they will probably just watch football next time.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: hounddoghowlie



i would like to point out that tonight is not the first time trump said he would appoint a special prosecutor.

The President can't appoint a special prosecutor.
Trump did not say that he will, tonight. I don't know about before. Maybe he learned something.





So basically you admit you were wrong. And spent this whole time being obtuse for...?


+1 more 
posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Wardaddy454




So basically you admit you were wrong. And spent this whole time being obtuse for...?

Please, specify where I was wrong.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Grambler




But Hillary is admitting to our face that she lies to the public.

Where?




You know normally I really like your post Phage, but you are being purposefully obtuse. I posted a post about Hillarys answering of the two faced question. I showed how her defence of saying she has different policies than what she tells the public was just saying Lincoln did it and it was good.

I showed how that if she didn't deny it, and instead said it was good when Lincoln did it, that implies she is also a fan of having one plan in public, and another in private. I showed examples of how she or her camp have been shown saying different things in public and private.

I asked if that worried her supporters. You responded with a question without answering the question.

I answer your question and again ask you to answer. You now act like you don't know what I am talking about.

Thats ok Phage, people can see how biased you are being.


Beat me to it. Maybe it was a realllllllly long pee.

Maybe you missed where I didn't take a pee.



So you did not say


Yes. The whole thing. Even though I had to pee.
on page 6?


+3 more 
posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Wardaddy454


So you did not say
Yes. I said I watched the whole thing even though I had to pee.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: RomeByFire
a reply to: Grambler

And where did said poster say in this thread "I am a Hillary Clinton supporter?" because I'm having a hard time finding it.

Biased? How, exactly? For being anti-Trump?

So people can't have an opinion with being biased? Who is the one being biased here?


I asked Hillary supporters to respond to a question. He responded with another question. I answered his question, and then reasked.

I never called him a Hillary reporter.

He asked me if I thought Trump was honest in real estate negotiations. I admitted no, and said even in the presidential election.

he attacks Trump and won't answer questions about Hillary. hence biased.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
That is not what she said.


Great response!

Care to give your interpretation of what she said, or are you happy to ignore her faults?



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Wardaddy454


So you did not say
Yes. I said I watched the whole thing even though I had to pee.


So I said maybe it was a really long pee, and you said that I missed the part where you didn't take a pee.

I guess this depends (ha) on what your definition of pee is?



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage


The President can't appoint a special prosecutor.

yes he can,


Sunday's debate in St. Louis was dramatic, to say the least.
Here's the fact-check, as it happened:
Can Trump appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Clinton?
VERDICT: TRUE
Trump said "If I win, I am going to instruct my Attorney General to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation because there has never been so many lies, so much deception." The US Attorney General does have the authority to appoint a special prosecutor, according to Stephen Vladeck, a CNN legal contributor and law professor with the University of Texas School of Law. Such action can be taken when the Attorney General determines that a criminal investigation is warranted and that an investigation by the Department of Justice would present a conflict of interest or "other extraordinary circumstance" and that "under the circumstances it would be in the public interest to appoint and outside Special Counsel."
Reality Check Quick Takes: Can Trump appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Clinton?




Trump did not say that he will, tonight.


it's right there in the video i posted, maybe you need to get a q tip and clean your ears out.
or if your attention span is not long enough, here is a shorter one.




edit on 10-10-2016 by hounddoghowlie because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler
No interpretation necessary.

CLINTON: Well, right. As I recall, that was something I said about Abraham Lincoln after having seen the wonderful Steven Spielberg movie called “Lincoln.” It was a master class watching President Lincoln get the Congress to approve the 13th Amendment. It was principled, and it was strategic.

And I was making the point that it is hard sometimes to get the Congress to do what you want to do and you have to keep working at it. And, yes, President Lincoln was trying to convince some people, he used some arguments, convincing other people, he used other arguments. That was a great — I thought a great display of presidential leadership.

fortune.com...



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:12 AM
link   
a reply to: hounddoghowlie




yes he can,

No. He can't.
The President cannot appoint a special prosecutor.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

I think Trump is a walking Hemorrhoid. Care to enlighten me on ANYTHING Hillary has done to make me care more about Trump? Sorry can't. Mainly because that logic is moronic.

I could care less about Hillary. In fact, one of the least appealing things to me is how close to Government she is. Her entire candidacy is a bias. Guess what, that doesn't make it "Okay" for Republican bias because of this, and the bias has been disgusting and record breaking. It's not like it's in conjecture to a single point.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage




The law authorizing judge-approved independent counsels lapsed in 1999. Under current law, the U.S. attorney general has a fairly wide purview to appoint a special prosecutor if she believes a criminal investigation is warranted or if the U.S. Justice Department cannot conduct the investigation independently, according to the Center for Legal and Economic Studies.

So while it would be legally possible for a President Trump to demand that his attorney general appoint a special prosecutor to investigate a former political opponent, it would be a first.


Time

Are you in possession of information these "journalists" seem to be missing? I'm really bad with mobile searching. Big thumbs.



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:19 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Thanks.The President has authority to direct the AG to appoint a special prosecutor. You have fulfilled my request.



new topics

top topics



 
97
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join