It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Clinton Hasn’t Said Anything In Private That She Doesn’t Say In Public

page: 1
19

log in

join
share:
+2 more 
posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 01:13 PM
link   
This wild and desperate claim is coming from Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta.

He was on TV and actually said this.

It was in response to leaked info that has Hillary saying: You Need A ‘Public’ And ‘Private’ Position On Every Issue

One public and one private, and Podesta even used a tangent issue to form the response to keep people fooled.

Wanna bet most of the the "2 positions" are not the same?

Probably opposite to keep the public and voters fooled and the private agendas happily moving forward.

Beware of these Global/NWO people who are in control of governments.

John Podesta Claims That Clinton Hasn’t Said Anything In Private That She Doesn’t Say In Public


During an interview on Fox News Sunday, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta was asked about speeches that Clinton gave to Wall Street that were made public by Wikileaks.

“There is nothing that she has said in private that she doesn’t say in public,” Podesta claimed.

This is an interesting statement by Podesta, considering recently released audio from a fundraiser in February, in which Clinton said of Bernie Sanders supporters:

“They are children of the great recession, and they are living in their parents’ basement. So if you’re feeling that you’re consigned to being a barista, or you know, some other job that doesn’t pay a lot and doesn’t have much of a ladder of opportunity attached to it, then the idea that maybe, just maybe, you could be part of a political revolution is pretty appealing.”

These comments are very different from comments she had made publicly about Sanders and his supporters. Last week, Sanders told Jake Tapper that these comments bothered him.





posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 01:17 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

The title of your thread made me come look for the punch line :>) ....



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 01:18 PM
link   
Keep it going xuenchen maybe one day you will actually read real sources and not just the headline of articles you like.

Your article straight up lies about Sanders and lies about Clinton.



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 01:19 PM
link   
Right... what about all of those paid speeches she gave to Goldman-Sachs.

She was pretty hell bent on keeping that a secret until she couldn't. It's crazy that so many people are trying to tow hillary across the finish line despite all of the dirt coming up on her. If people can't see that the system is rigged by now, they deserve what they get.

She won't be MY president if she wins. I'll continue to live my daily life doing what I need to do to survive. It's not like any of us really ever had control...



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 01:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pyle
Keep it going xuenchen maybe one day you will actually read real sources and not just the headline of articles you like.

Your article straight up lies about Sanders and lies about Clinton.



You read all that in 5 min huh?



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 01:33 PM
link   
Honest politicians, yah right.

The bit I heard has her worried the public 'can't handle the truth'. IOW, "We lie".



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Every living person says things in private that they would not say in public. This sort of over-compensating by John Podesta only serves to underline what Hillary Clinton actually said in the speech in question.

Her point was that one needed to have a public position that obscured or denied one's actual position on an issue. In other words, tell the public what they want to hear, and then do whatever you want to do.



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 01:50 PM
link   
a reply to: thesaneone



These comments are very different from comments she had made publicly about Sanders and his supporters. Last week, Sanders told Jake Tapper that these comments bothered him.


Do I really need to read it when the part he quoted lied?



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 02:13 PM
link   
"You need a 'public' and 'private' position on every issue."

There's a word for that... its called "fraud".



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 03:00 PM
link   
www.nationalenquirer.com...

nationalenquirer.com/photos/hillary-clinton-lesbian-lovers-state-department-report/



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 07:15 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


"We need to be elevating the Pied Piper candidates so that they are leaders of the pack and tell the press to them seriously," it said in the email.

If you were wondering if a Trump candidacy was any worry to Clinton, then wonder no more.

The hacked emails released by Wikileaks shows an interesting tidbit about how the Democrats looked at the idea of a Trump candidacy, and you can safely see that of all the candidates Hillary actively wanted to face, Trump was on the list.

Calling them the "pied piper" candidates, team Hillary describes Trump, Cruz, and Carson as nominees that could - if handled properly - make the extreme the mainstream.

www.redstate.com...



new topics

top topics



 
19

log in

join