It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Donald Trump releases statement on "lewd comments"

page: 5
13
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 01:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: CranialSponge
a reply to: LesMisanthrope



Then why did he hire them in top executive positions?


The answer to that question is pretty blatantly obvious.



Go ahead, think it through to it's clear conclusion.

The rest of us will wait while you chew it over until the lightbulb goes on...





Let me guess, to grab their pink bits?




posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:01 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope



I don't think I should have to apologize for saying anything.

Gosh. You're very special.


I would at least pretend I was sincere because apparently that antidote seems to work on those who feign injury from it.
Sure fake it. Why not? You've never done or said anything that hurt anyone. Sincerity not required.




edit on 10/8/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: SaturnFX

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Phage

Then why did he hire them in top executive positions?

Because the people he put in charge of hiring felt they were qualified for the job at hand would be my guess.

a sexist isn't necessarily a misogynist.
Trump certainly doesn't hate woman, one could argue he likes em a bit too much actually.

But anyhow, who specifically did he hire that you are discussing? I do hope you aren't talking about his apprentice shows.


I've only read that one Washington Post article, so I have no conviction.



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LesMisanthrope



I don't think I should have to apologize for saying anything.

Gosh. You're very special.


I would at least pretend I was sincere because apparently that antidote seems to work on those who feign injury from it.
Sure fake it. Why not? You've never done or said anything that hurt anyone.




You're not so bad yourself. Shamefully, I have hurt many feelings. I do apologize to those, but I wouldn't apologize to you because you happened to hear them.



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:04 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope




I do apologize to those

Did you say "I'm sorry if I hurt you?"
Did you say "I'm sorry, but...?"



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I find a simple "I'm sorry" works. But like I said, I would not apologize to you for overhearing them.



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:07 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Yeah.
Donny could have said that. But he didn't.
Did he.

edit on 10/8/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Yeah.
Donny could have said that. But he didn't.
Did he.


As he shouldn't have. He has nothing to apologize for, save for perhaps the person he was talking to, and to whomever it was about. The puritanical among us should apologize for letting a small private conversation from over a decade ago be the cause of their moral posturing.



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:10 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Patterns, Les.
Patterns.



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Patterns, Les.
Patterns.


A thread-bare one. He was talking. That's it.



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:12 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

A thread-bare one. He was talking. That's it.

You're sure about that.



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

No, I think there is a pattern, but one that is one-sided.



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:18 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
My post was not about his pattern.
It was about your statement that

He was talking. That's it.



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:18 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
My post was not about his pattern.
It was about your statement that

He was talking. That's it.


You're sure.

edit on 10/8/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

No I'm not sure. Admittedly I'm giving some benefit of the doubt. Are you sure?



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:22 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Pretty sure.

Patterns.



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:22 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Pretty sure.

Patterns.



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
The guy who works at the local gas station isn't rich but he grabs puzzies in exchange for free drinks, hotdogs, pizza slices, and such.


He'd fall into the 'wouldn't let sit your kids' category.



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Let me guess, to grab their pink bits?


What a shocker.



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Pretty sure.

Patterns.



I wouldn't mind seeing them.



new topics

top topics



 
13
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join