It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Smug Clinton Vs Blustering Trump - OMG - What a Choice

page: 2
2
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 01:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: Annee

Does it matter what his motives?

He could make out with Putin live on TV for all I care long as we dont end up in nuclear war.


Yes it matters. Of course it matters.

Trump only cares about Trump. Putin would so manipulate him.

The fact Putin doesn't want Clinton - - - is a positive IMO. She's an equal opponent - - if not more powerful then Putin.




posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 01:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Wingless?

Nah.

Clueless?

Yep.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 01:46 PM
link   
Trump says things things people don't like, is flashy and arrogant, and despite his nearly half-century of leadership experience has never held public office, which is enough to send people into fits of sanctimonious rage. Hillary has held public office for quite some time, has already been in the Whitehouse, giving us a taste of her experience and leaving us a with a lingering bad taste in our mouths.

Either way, hindsight is greater than prophecy. We will not know the outcomes of a Trump in public office until it happens, while we already have a good idea of what Hillary in public office looks like.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 01:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Hillary has held public office for quite some time, has already been in the Whitehouse, . . .


Yes.


. . . giving us a taste of her experience and leaving us a with a lingering bad taste in our mouths.


Personal opinion.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Hillary has international, high level connections.

Trumps own party doesn't fully support him.

Who do you honestly think would fair better going "head to head" with Putin, and other high level politicians?

edit on 7-10-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 01:51 PM
link   
On the political stage, all Trump has done is "words, words and more words". All Hillary has done is actual bad deed after actual bad deed. Hillary has a LONG laundry list of these horrible deeds and fails. So I'd much rather vote for Trump (hes just used words) vs voting for Hillary (bad stuff she has actually REALLY done). We have a good snapshot of what a Hillary term would look like and its not pretty in the least. She is the devil. She is an evil and vile woman who speaks with a forked tongue.
edit on 7-10-2016 by Bloodydagger because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 01:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee



Hillary has international, high level connections.


Like who?


Who do you honestly think would fair better going "head to head" with Putin, and other high level politicians?


Trump, just like he did with Nieto and Netanyahu. Passed that test with flying colors.
edit on 7-10-2016 by LesMisanthrope because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 01:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Annee



Hillary has international, high level connections.


Like who?


Bilderbergers, Tri-Lateral Commission, Skull and Bones, Masons, Bohemian Grove, MJ12 and many others. She is one of "theirs". Meaning the global elite. Hillary is a puppet of the Rothschild's. She is hand picked by these people.

She probably has high level connections within the Muslim Brotherhood too.
edit on 7-10-2016 by Bloodydagger because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 02:08 PM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Trump and Nieto didn't seem to have the same conversation.

Trump, per usual, sees/hears only what he wants to see/hear.

Then promotes himself.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 02:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee



Trump and Nieto didn't seem to have the same conversation.

Trump, per usual, sees/hears only what he wants to see/hear.

Then promotes himself.


They were very cordial, very amicable, and the entire situation was handled well. Trump was, dare I say it, "presidential".

Hillary didn't even go.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 02:17 PM
link   
Voting Third party is the answer. Vote Support get involved.

We all know the Green Party, Libertarian Party but, I think, there are 26 other Candidates on the ballots of at least one, many of them at least 5 and a handful on at least 20 states.

At some point, third party support will reach a tipping point where they get main stream media coverage, major endorsements and will have as much chance of winning the presidential elections as the two corporate owned parties we have now. That tipping point won't come to us magically though--poof! It takes time and every vote counts, every donation counts, every blog post, anonymous ATS post like this counts. We're slowly creeping up there, one step at a time. It's not a wasted vote.

don't let your brainwashed friends bully you into voting for the "lesser of Two evils" or tell in abject horror that if you don't vote for trump we'll get hillary or if we don't vote for Hillary we'll get trump. Vote your conscience with a clear mind that every little bit helps.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 02:19 PM
link   
a reply to: amazing

Third party is not an answer. It's a throw away vote that will only help one of the 2 main candidates.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 02:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Annee



Hillary has international, high level connections.


Like who?


Bilderbergers, Tri-Lateral Commission, Skull and Bones, Masons, Bohemian Grove, MJ12 and many others. She is one of "theirs". Meaning the global elite. Hillary is a puppet of the Rothschild's. She is hand picked by these people.

She probably has high level connections within the Muslim Brotherhood too.


I was into all that when I first got into conspiracies --- about 20 years ago.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 02:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Annee



Trump and Nieto didn't seem to have the same conversation.

Trump, per usual, sees/hears only what he wants to see/hear.

Then promotes himself.


They were very cordial, very amicable, and the entire situation was handled well. Trump was, dare I say it, "presidential".

Hillary didn't even go.


Not what I would consider presidential. Anyone can do a polite "white wash". And why was Trump having a meeting with a foreign leader?

Has anything changed. Where are the results of this meeting?



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 02:30 PM
link   
a reply to: amazing

If you're the best choice for president, why are you 3rd party?
edit on 7-10-2016 by Annee because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 02:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee




Not what I would consider presidential. Anyone can do a polite "white wash". And why was Trump having a meeting with a foreign leader?

Has anything changed. Where are the results of this meeting?


Hillary's whole career is a "whitewash", while the stories of her power-grubbing, contempt for others, and bullying behind closed doors continue to grow.

Trump was invited.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 02:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Annee




Not what I would consider presidential. Anyone can do a polite "white wash". And why was Trump having a meeting with a foreign leader?

Has anything changed. Where are the results of this meeting?


Hillary's whole career is a "whitewash", while the stories of her power-grubbing, contempt for others, and bullying behind closed doors continue to grow.

Trump was invited.


Yes.

She sounds like a real world leader to me.

Nice doesn't get the job done in the trenches.

Your view of president sounds like unrealistic idealism to me.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 02:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Annee


Yes.

She sounds like a real world leader to me.

Nice doesn't get the job done in the trenches.

Your view of president sounds like unrealistic idealism to me.


Yes, treating your underlings, staff and the people paid to protect you with contempt is a fine quality of leadership.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 02:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Annee


Yes.

She sounds like a real world leader to me.

Nice doesn't get the job done in the trenches.

Your view of president sounds like unrealistic idealism to me.


Yes, treating your underlings, staff and the people paid to protect you with contempt is a fine quality of leadership.

That sounds like Trump.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 03:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
a reply to: amazing

Third party is not an answer. It's a throw away vote that will only help one of the 2 main candidates.


Unless you look at it differently. My main problem with Clinton and Trump is that I don't like either of them. My second problem is that I think they are almost the same. What's the difference between the two? None, in my opinion or small enough to be of no real consequence.

Therefore, If I vote Third party and if everyone votes third party, it helps them with easier ballot access next time, matching funds next time more mainstream coverage this time and therefore more support early on, when it matters most for next time.

How is that a throw away vote? At least I can look my children in the face and say I wasn't brainwashed enough to vote for Clinton or Trump. I can also say that I wasn't a sell out like Cruz or Sanders.
edit on 7-10-2016 by amazing because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 03:22 PM
link   
a reply to: amazing
I would not vote, rather then vote 3rd party.

3rd party is not going to win, but it might affect who wins in the 2 party.




top topics



 
2
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join