It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Miracula2
Islam calls for the execution of people who will not convert.
Christianity's bible calls for the same thing.
Btw: I cut the rest of your rant because I don't care about your feelings towards Muslims.
1. Say: O disbelievers!
2. I worship not that which ye worship;
3. Nor worship ye that which I worship.
4. And I shall not worship that which ye worship.
5. Nor will ye worship that which I worship.
6. Unto you your religion, and unto me my religion.
originally posted by: surnamename57
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Generalization as a method is generally superficial.
originally posted by: surnamename57
a reply to: Krazysh0t
I just edited my last post to be more clear.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: surnamename57
a reply to: Krazysh0t
I just edited my last post to be more clear.
It still applies to you. Religious practices change with the region or even from person to person. Pretending like all of Islam is uniform is a dumb idea.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: CornShucker
I found this regarding the lawsuit that was filed by the woods...
LINK
the case is still going through the judicial system so it doesn't really answer that many questions. but, according to what facts it does provide, the school is claiming that the father made threats against the school. that is why he was banned from the premises. it also points out that there avenues that the father could have taken to get that ban lifted, but he didn't go for them. it is possible that if he had, it would have been determined that there was just a misunderstanding between the father in the school in that phone conversation and ban would have been lifted.
Thursday, October 06, 2016
Suit Over High School Assignment On Islam Moves Forward
In Wood v. Board of Education of Charles County, (D MD, Sept. 30, 2016), a Maryland federal district court refused to completely dismiss a suit by parents of an 11th grader who complained that their daughter's World History assignments "promot[ed] the Islamic religion over other faiths" and "required the students . . . to profess statements on the teachings and beliefs of Islam in written worksheets as graded homework assignments." The father warned the school against retaliating against his daughter for her adherence to her Christian faith. The court dismissed plaintiffs' claim for injunctive relief as moot since their daughter had now graduated. However the court allowed the parents to move ahead with their Establishment Clause and compelled speech claim for damages against the school's principal and vice principal, saying in part:
Here, while discovery and trial may or may not prove otherwise, Plaintiffs allege in the Complaint that in addition to learning facts about the background and beliefs relevant to Islam, Defendants required C.W. to “confess” the Islamic Profession of Faith....
The court also allowed the father-- who was barred from school grounds after threatening media coverage and a lawsuit-- to move ahead with his claim of retaliation. The court dismissed due process, Title VI and Title IX claims.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Miracula2
Islam calls for the execution of people who will not convert.
Christianity's bible calls for the same thing.
-- snip --
originally posted by: CornShucker
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Miracula2
Islam calls for the execution of people who will not convert.
Christianity's bible calls for the same thing.
-- snip --
My bible may be well worn, but it isn't in any danger of falling apart if I open it one more time.
I'm not Jewish, I'm a Christian. Jesus brought a new covenant.
While I may not be from Missouri, you'll have to show me. Just exactly Where in the New Testament do you see Jesus calling for the execution of someone who chooses not to convert? (I have various copies, so don't hesitate to use the one you are going by...)
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: CornShucker
My bible may be well worn, but it isn't in any danger of falling apart if I open it one more time.
I'm not Jewish, I'm a Christian. Jesus brought a new covenant.
Translation: "It's ok for Christianity to pick and choose excerpts from their religious works, but not Muslims."
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: CornShucker
While I may not be from Missouri, you'll have to show me. Just exactly Where in the New Testament do you see Jesus calling for the execution of someone who chooses not to convert? (I have various copies, so don't hesitate to use the one you are going by...)
And why can I not use the Old Testament? It's certainly part of your Bible. Oh that's right because you have different standards for Christians than Muslims. So Christians can be judged with a different set of rules than Muslims.
2. The United States Supreme Court has held that our public schools should not promote a certain religion over others: “School sponsorship of a religious message is impermissible because it sends the ancillary message to members of the audience who are nonadherants ‘that they are outsiders, . . . and an accompanying message to adherants that they are insiders.’” Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Doe, 530 U.S. 290, 309-10 (2000) (quoting Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668, 688 (1982) (O’Connor, J., concurring)).
3. United States Supreme Court precedent does not create a double standard that allows for the promotion of Islam in our public schools while disallowing and silencing the teachings of Christianity and Judaism.
4. This case, therefore, seeks to protect and vindicate the fundamental constitutional rights of two Maryland parents and their daughter, C.W., who were harshly punished for voicing concerns about the desecration of their Christian beliefs and heritage and the promotion of the Islamic faith in the Defendants’ World History class.
5. Defendants concealed that their high school World History class promoted Islam. The class syllabus failed to mention that the course involved the teaching and promotion of Case 8:16-cv-00239-GJH Document 1 Filed 01/27/16 Page 2 of 25 3 Islam. The class syllabus also failed to mention that Defendants were using two different textbooks. Defendants required that students keep the second textbook, which extensively covered Islam, at the school. Defendants only allowed students to take home the first textbook that did not extensively cover or devote a separate chapter to Islam.
6. Defendants patently rejected the valid requests and complaints of Plaintiffs, as concerned parents, and discriminated against Plaintiffs’ daughter, C.W., by removing her from the academic environment of her World History class, relegating her to the student library, and issuing her failing grades on assignments because C.W. refused to deny and insult her Christian beliefs by affirming, for example, that Muslims hold stronger faith convictions than Christians. See Exhibit 1 (“Most Muslim’s faith is stronger than the average Christian.”) (emphasis in original).
7. Defendants’ curriculum, practices, policies, actions, procedures, and customs promote the Islamic faith by requiring students to profess the five pillars of Islam and to write out faith statements of the religion. Defendants require that students write out and confess the Shahada, the Islamic Profession of Faith.
8. Defendants, however, do not treat Christianity in the same manner as Islam. Defendants do not require students to profess or write out faith statements of Christianity, including creeds associated with Christianity. In fact, Defendants teach about Christianity in a disparaging manner and do not require students to learn any tenants of Christianity or Judaism, such as the Ten Commandments.
9. Defendants spent only one day teaching Christianity, but devoted approximately two weeks to promoting Islam.
All emphasis CornShucker's except as noted at the end of section 6.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Krazysh0t
You are confusing your belief systems. Old Testament - Judaism. New Testament - Christian, who use the Old Testament as historical. Quran - Muslim, who (so I have been told) use both Testaments as historical.
Good argument for religious history being taught in school.
TheRedneck
“For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass the law until all is accomplished. Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” — Matthew 5:18-19
“It is easier for Heaven and Earth to pass away than for the smallest part of the letter of the law to become invalid.” (Luke 16:17)
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest part or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place.” (Matthew 5:17)
Again... Public High School is not the same as college. Retaliating against their daughter by isolating her in the school library and giving her failing grades is blatant discrimination and shows, by default, that the offense part of the class to a believing Christian was mandatory.
It would go a long way if you could show me an example of a public school that was reprimanded for requiring Muslim students to memorize and recite the Sinner's Prayer (Yes, it's a prayer!). Doubtful you can find one, though.
originally posted by: BlackProject
a reply to: blueman12
It is not required to live a healthy and normal life
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Now, would you mind telling me what I want for dinner tonight?
TheRedneck
including two of Singapore's neighbouring countries, Malaysia and Brunei. Of these, judicial caning, for which Singapore is best known, is the most severe. It is reserved for male convicts under the age of 50, for a wide range of offences under the Criminal Procedure Code, and is also used as a disciplinary measure in prisons. Caning is also a legal form of punishment for delinquent servicemen in the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) and is conducted in the SAF Detention Barracks. Caning is also used as an official punishment in reform schools. In a milder form, caning is used to punish male students in primary and secondary schools for serious misbehaviour. The government encourages this but does not allow caning for female students, who instead receive alternative forms of punishment such as detention. A much smaller cane or other implement is also used by some parents to punish their children for misbehaving. This is allowed in Singapore but "not encoura