It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Yale Psychiatrist show that Psychic Abilities exist

page: 13
39
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: neoholographic

And that's just a random page of angelfire. There's no links to anything on there to even corroborate the story.

Keep trying!


Try google LOL

You can contact the Detectives yourself or look for documentation from the case.

Of course pseudoskeptics are too lazy to do this!




posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:29 PM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

Wait, what?! You want me to google YOUR evidence?!

Typical psuedoscience pusher. Can't even provide the evidence they think they have.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:29 PM
link   
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance


I do believe that comment falls into the category of a "Fallacy of Logic".



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:30 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

You're the one who said you don't believe it. Are you too lazy to research these cases? You don't want to know the truth. You just blindly believe what you believe/



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:30 PM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

That's interesting.
Why are they still looking for the killer?


RACHEL LOMBERA – $50,000 REWARD

On September 18, 1989, 30-year-old Rachel Lombera was found in her apartment, beaten to death. Ms. Lombera was last seen alive leaving a local bar with a Hispanic male. The male had also taken her vehicle, abandoning it sometime later.

Contact: Selma Police Department.

www.citizensagainsthomicide.org...

Nevermind. Out of date, apparently.
caselaw.findlaw.com...

edit on 10/7/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)

edit on 10/7/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)

edit on 10/7/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:31 PM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

You're the one posting "evidence" of what you're saying lol. Why should I have to do your leg work for you?



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: neoholographic

That's interesting.
Why are they still looking for the killer?


RACHEL LOMBERA – $50,000 REWARD

On September 18, 1989, 30-year-old Rachel Lombera was found in her apartment, beaten to death. Ms. Lombera was last seen alive leaving a local bar with a Hispanic male. The male had also taken her vehicle, abandoning it sometime later.

Contact: Selma Police Department.

www.citizensagainsthomicide.org...

Nevermind. Out of date, apparently.
caselaw.findlaw.com...


LOL!!

OOPS!

You pseudoskeptics are too funny!



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:36 PM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

Better than putting up an article that you misinterpreted and passing it off as truth.

At least phage admitted to his mistake. You're ark here pushing your misunderstanding as fact.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: neoholographic

Better than putting up an article that you misinterpreted and passing it off as truth.

At least phage admitted to his mistake. You're ark here pushing your misunderstanding as fact.


Please stop.

You're not adding anything to the thread and you just keep clogging up the thread with this meaningless nonsense. When will you say anything that has any substance or that's supported by any evidence?
edit on 7-10-2016 by neoholographic because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:40 PM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

When you admit that the article doesn't confirm or deny psychics are real.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: neoholographic

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: neoholographic

Better than putting up an article that you misinterpreted and passing it off as truth.

At least phage admitted to his mistake. You're ark here pushing your misunderstanding as fact.


Please stop.

You're not adding anything to the thread and you just keep clogging up the thread with this meaningless nonsense. When will you say anything that has any substance or that's supported by any evidence?




posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:43 PM
link   
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

You don't like anecdotal evidence which distracts from the claim of the OP?



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: neoholographic

When you admit that the article doesn't confirm or deny psychics are real.
Of course it shows a biological basis for psychic ability. You can keep making a fool out of yourself that doesn't bother me. There's just no need to respond to you anymore until you actually say something or provide some evidence to support anything you're saying.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:45 PM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

The article in your op fully supports my claim that it doesn't confirm or deny the existence of psychics.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Anecdotal seems the way of these forums. Just look at, well, this thread lol.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: neoholographic

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: neoholographic

When you admit that the article doesn't confirm or deny psychics are real.
Of course it shows a biological basis for psychic ability.

Please quote the part of the article where this is stated.



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:47 PM
link   
Here's more:

“These individuals have a much higher degree of control over the voices. They also have a greater willingness to engage with and view the voices as positive or neutral to their lives,’’ Corlett said. “We predict this population will teach us a lot about the neurobiology, cognitive psychology and eventually treatment of distressing voices.”

How can this population help with neurobiology and cognitive philosophy if there isn't a biological basis for psychic ability???



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:48 PM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

How can this population help with neurobiology and cognitive philosophy if there isn't a biological basis for psychic ability hallucination???



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:48 PM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

That quote is about the voices they hear.

Not about psychic abilities being real or not.
edit on 7102016 by TerryDon79 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2016 @ 06:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: neoholographic

originally posted by: Greggers

originally posted by: neoholographic
a reply to: Soylent Green Is People

Again, psychic abilities is hearing voices and conversating with these voices. That's why they call them clairaudient psychics.

Powers and Philip Corlett, assistant professor of psychiatry and senior author on the paper along with Yale neuroscience graduate student Megan Kelley, studied a group called clairaudient psychics, who report receiving daily auditory messages. The subjects who reported hearing voices were given tests from forensic psychiatry designed to identify those who falsely claim to be hearing voices in order to avoid criminal prosecution. Both psychics and psychosis patients had similar scores on tests meant to detect false claims of hearing voices. However, patients with schizophrenia were much more likely to report negative experiences when hearing voices or discussing the voices with other people.

There could be a relationship between schizophrenia and psychic ability and that's why I talked about synaptic pruning. You guys just blindly respond and don't read anything people say.

Just because they're closely related doesn't mean the voices Psychics hear aren't real. This is why I listed a bunch of Police Detectives who worked with these crazy Psychics and they helped them solve crimes. Here's more:

1) Police Deputy Ronnie Whisman “We (the police) were impressed by the psychic on the important information she was able to give us … everything she said about the case came true.”

2) Special agent Darrel Stilwell said, “ .. obviously she has power … (Noreen’s psychic skills) gives you a little extra something to work for.”

3) District Attorney Le Blanc: “Rosemary’s contribution to this case was significant …I relied on the psychic Rosemary for details …There are clearly individuals in this world who have an ability that are beyond our normal five senses. Rosemary (the psychic) is such a person.”

4) Lt. Joe Kozenczak said: “The amazing thing is that the police didn’t know about these all murders … she (the psychic) told us. I became a believer in psychics.”

5) Detective Larry Beaver Mid-West Police Dept.:“If the opportunity presented itself again for me to work with a psychic I’d be very open to that and would enjoy the opportunity to see another psychic or even work with Sally Headding to get a feel for really and truly how they work. I was very amazed working with Sally … I truly believe there are people in the world who do have abilities beyond the normal person. Sally to me is a real person with a real gift.”

6)Detective Richard Fallin Montgomery Police: “Deborah’s description of the grave site was very close to what it was … it was excellent...The psychic in this case helped us out. I’m open to using psychics if she can help me I’m very pleased to take her help to help me close cases.”

7) Lt. Alex Rinaldi, “The only reason why we searched the Mohawk River was because of the psychic telling us that’s where he (the victim) is – and we found him. In an investigation, if the family decides to employ a forensic psychic …and develop some type of information certainly I’m going to listen to it and will look into it – and if credible I’ll investigate."

8) Detective Jim Gallaghar: "I was stunned and amazed what she (the psychic) told us ... the Prosecution decided it was very important for Rosemary (the psychic) to testify. She led the police directly to the killer. You can't dispute that ... that is a fact what happened ... I was skeptical prior to this but there's no doubt in my mind that Rosemary has a gift."


www.victorzammit.com...

Again, it supports exactly what I have said.


Oh look. A bunch of quotes. You should throw in the QM guys some more. We could all use some more Quantum Woo.


WOW, Quantum Woo!

You know a pseudoskeptic is getting desperate when they break out this silly term LOL!


Who are you talking to?



new topics

top topics



 
39
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join