It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Third Witness Added In New Trump Child Rape Suit

page: 2
19
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 01:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: rollanotherone

I said that right in the OP.

Yeah? I stopped reading pretty much everything you post. It's become too predictable. I can only read the same thing over and over again, like the same magazine in a bathroom for months on end, before I stop finding it interesting.
After reading your OP, I find what you're doing to be very clever. Make the thread about Trump and his connections first and upfront, and bury the Clinton connection at the bottom. Nice one.





posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 01:33 AM
link   
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask


No offense to the OP but lets see what evidence comes forth before we try to judge....anyone can allege anything.


Agreed! The allegations may be utterly untrue. I'm certainly not saying otherwise.



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 01:33 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

the amount of nonsense the media is pumping out about Trump, I expect many people will just take this as another BS hit piece.

and it is, think about all the money, resources and investigative assets the Clinton empire has right now investigating Trump and every thing he's ever done.

If there was any shred of proof of this, it would have been news long ago.

the fact they wait until an election to do this just makes it all the more crap.

oh, the reason people ignore these kind topics (by you) is because of your 100% anti trump position on everything regardless of facts, truth or reality.

dont get me wrong, I was the same way with G Bush...you have to deal with the fact many people like trump and they're sick of the bs news articles that you (and others) seem to believe without any questions.

just my 22.2cents



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 01:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: rollanotherone

I said that right in the OP.

Yeah? I stopped reading pretty much everything you post. It's become too predictable. I can only read the same thing over and over again, like the same magazine in a bathroom for months on end, before I stop finding it interesting.
After reading your OP, I find what you're doing to be very clever. Make the thread about Trump and his connections first and upfront, and bury the Clinton connection at the bottom. Nice one.



Perfect post that sums up the ATS "View" on information. LALALA I can't hear you.
edit on 4-10-2016 by jonsoup because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 01:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

That thread and this thread are not about the same thing at all. That thread is about 20 former female contestants of The Apprentice saying that Donald Trump harassed them. Did you not open the thread and instead jump to conclusions based on the title?


That's why the other thread has the quote about refiling and the third witness. Right? That makes yours different how? Ats should take away points for wilful ignorance in redundancy.

Cheers - Dave



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 01:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask


No offense to the OP but lets see what evidence comes forth before we try to judge....anyone can allege anything.


Agreed! The allegations may be utterly untrue. I'm certainly not saying otherwise.
Again with the cleverness. You make a thread about and Trump, but make yourself appear to be impartial with posts like this one I quoted. Man, I would love to look at the world through your eyes for a day.



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 01:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask


No offense to the OP but lets see what evidence comes forth before we try to judge....anyone can allege anything.


Agreed! The allegations may be utterly untrue. I'm certainly not saying otherwise.


Agreed I know you are not OP , I know you're critical like I am of the political personality, but will be objective in your assessment......

However this accusation SHOULD be scrutinized just like anything should be from anyone!

Thank you for bringing it to the forefront........



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 01:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask


No offense to the OP but lets see what evidence comes forth before we try to judge....anyone can allege anything.


Agreed! The allegations may be utterly untrue. I'm certainly not saying otherwise.
Again with the cleverness. You make a thread about and Trump, but make yourself appear to be impartial with posts like this one I quoted. Man, I would love to look at the world through your eyes for a day.


He may be partial , so what? hes still examine the information and has made it known that .......

I dislike Trump as well, but still want to know the truth before leveling an accusation......

I HATE Hillary and thats a strong word, but I would still be objective in any post leveling charges on her......

Look at the content instead of your OWN bias on the OP



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 01:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: jonsoup

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: rollanotherone

I said that right in the OP.

Yeah? I stopped reading pretty much everything you post. It's become too predictable. I can only read the same thing over and over again, like the same magazine in a bathroom for months on end, before I stop finding it interesting.
After reading your OP, I find what you're doing to be very clever. Make the thread about Trump and his connections first and upfront, and bury the Clinton connection at the bottom. Nice one.



Perfect post that sums up the ATS "View" on information. LALALA I can't hear you.

Yup. You pegged me perfectly. Man, do you know me? Have we met at the range before?
Oh wait, I shouldn't assume gender. Sorry, forgive me.
Person, do you know me?
In any case, when you read enough threads, you can see a pattern with the "usual suspects" and their posts are more entertainment than information. I don't mind a good lesson here and there, but threads like this provide nothing new. ESPECIALLY since there already exists a new thread on this very same subject.



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 01:41 AM
link   
a reply to: rollanotherone

So you're saying that you don't think there's any truth to the allegations? Donald Trump like many other oligarchs has a known history with Jeffrey Epstein. In fact, Jeffrey Epstein should be a much bigger topic of conversation around here considering the fact that he's a nexus of oligarchs.



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 01:42 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

Yeah this seems political in nature especially when you look at rhe woman who found them and started the suit. The reason is everyone that had anything to do with epstien was under suspition. There were claims against of course Bill Clinton Prince Henry but it didn't stop there he kept a bool.Under the letter B alone are listed Tony Blair, Michael Bloomberg, and Richard Branson. Elsewhere there are multiple contacts – typically at offices, homes, and via aides’ mobile phones – for Rupert Murdoch, Donald Trump, Dustin Hoffman, Naomi Campbell, and dozens of other A-listers. So we know he had huge parties and we know very rich and powerful attended. What else went on is speculation and basically down to what ever claim they want to make as fat as proof there isn't any and wouldn't expect there to be after 20 years.



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 01:52 AM
link   
a reply to: rollanotherone

Would that be anything like the "usual suspects" from the Trump mob who have pounced on this thread, have done nothing but insult me repeatedly in a desperate attempt to silence any discussion that might be critical of Donald Trump and are hypocritcally ranting about seeing patterns?

Give me a break.

Do you or do you not have anything to say about the topic?

There is a young woman who claims that when she was 13, she was raped by Donald Trump (and Epstein) at a Jeffrey Epstein party. She has a witness who claims that she recruited young girls for this exact purpose for Jeffrey Epstein and she witnessed Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein repeatedly rape a 13 year-old.

She now has a witness who is saying the allegation is a new one and that she was told about it when it happened.

Jeffrey Epstein is in fact a convicted sex offender and the story fits with the crimes for which he's known to have committed:

Jeffrey Epstein


In March 2005, a woman contacted Palm Beach police and alleged her 14-year-old daughter had been taken to Jeffrey Epstein's mansion by an older girl and paid $300 after stripping and massaging him.[10] She had undressed, but left on her underwear.[19] Police started an 11-month undercover investigation of Epstein, followed by a search of his home. Subsequently, they alleged that Epstein had paid several escorts to perform sexual acts on him. Interviews with five alleged victims and seventeen witnesses under oath, a high-school transcript and other items they found in Epstein's trash and home allegedly showed that some girls were under 18.[20] A search of Epstein's home found large numbers of photos of girls throughout the house, some of whom had been interviewed earlier by the police.[19] Papers filed in 2006 state that Epstein installed concealed cameras in numerous places in his property to record sex between prominent people and underage prostitutes for criminal purposes such as blackmail.[21]


The connection between Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump and others is well established. At face value, it has to seem at least possible.

I dunno, I heard it somewhere. That's what everything thinks. It could be true, right? I'm not saying it is but it's what many people say.



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 01:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
Do you or do you not have anything to say about the topic?


Don't be so selfish, we're not just talking about you.
/s

I already commented on the topic - i think its a total load of BS. I think the timing of it (during an election) is very very suspect.

I think with the money and resources Clinton has - something would have been unearthed in the past 12 months if this was true.

Just because someone accuses someone of something, doesn't make it true.



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 01:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: rollanotherone

So you're saying that you don't think there's any truth to the allegations? Donald Trump like many other oligarchs has a known history with Jeffrey Epstein. In fact, Jeffrey Epstein should be a much bigger topic of conversation around here considering the fact that he's a nexus of oligarchs.

If I believe Hollywood, then everyone who is wealthy has done despicable things. I am just an average American trying to pay off my house, raise my daughter, and live long enough to enjoy retirement. I don't have the time or the energy to worry about what some billionaires are doing. Do you?



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 01:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: ksiezyc
This couldn't be added on to an existing thread on these allegations?


Could it be that you don't want people to notice the development?



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 01:58 AM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr

This is what I'm saying. People are pretending like Jeffrey Epstein is some made up boogeyman — he is not — and it would be impossible to overstate how well connected he is. Politicians, bankers, entertainers, media personalities, publishers, royalty, etc.

Given his convictions and the testimonies of those 20+ witnesses who testified against him, these allegations don't seem that unreasonable. They could of course just be an attempt to extort money from Donald Trump — it certainly would be the first time that somebody abused the legal system in attempt to extort money.

A lot of times nothing comes of these allegations but other times as in the recent cases of Bill Cosby and Roger Ailes, something does.

I think it's worth keeping an eye on.



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 02:00 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

Would that be anything like the little girl who Hillary laughed about when she got the accused rapist off in court?



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 02:08 AM
link   
a reply to: rollanotherone


If I believe Hollywood, then everyone who is wealthy has done despicable things. I am just an average American trying to pay off my house, raise my daughter, and live long enough to enjoy retirement. I don't have the time or the energy to worry about what some billionaires are doing. Do you?


What makes you think that I'm any different? I worry about them when they're running for President.



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 02:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: rollanotherone
a reply to: theantediluvian

Would that be anything like the little girl who Hillary laughed about when she got the accused rapist off in court?



Are you having a hard time distinguishing the difference between the severity between laughing at evidence and a person who supposedly raped someone?

Please don't desperately deflect from the issue.



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 02:18 AM
link   
I was denial in many years but I finally feel that this is the right time to face my demons.

Trump also raped me as a child.

I have three witnesses who will back me up.

My pain and suffering is going to cost at least a million for me to drop it.

See how easy that is?



new topics

top topics



 
19
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join