It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Tabby's Star Just Got Even Stranger , again

page: 3
22
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 08:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: AshFan

originally posted by: schuyler

originally posted by: AshFan
The prevailing scientific knowledge on this, is that the star is shy, and Keplar spying on it is making it bashful.


Tabby's Star is 1,480 light years from Earth, therefore the light we are seeing today left the star in approximately 536 AD, a time well before Kepler. Tabby's Star could not possibly know that Kepler is spying on it these last few years. Therefore that hypothesis is proven invalid. Try again? (Y/N) __
.


Quantum super awareness duh. Spooky knowledge at a distance.


Nice try! Let's see now. Quantum entanglement is when you move an electron in one place, it's analog moves in another place way far away, thus defying speed of light and all that. So from single electrons we get to a space telescope looking at a star that is 1480 years way, and the star knows it? Now we have experimental data more or less proving the first. Do we have any experimental data proving the second? Or is this more of a drop of water from a rubber ducky in the bathtub kills a beautiful butterfly in China kind of thing?




posted on Oct, 5 2016 @ 06:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: schuyler

originally posted by: AshFan

originally posted by: schuyler

originally posted by: AshFan
The prevailing scientific knowledge on this, is that the star is shy, and Keplar spying on it is making it bashful.


Tabby's Star is 1,480 light years from Earth, therefore the light we are seeing today left the star in approximately 536 AD, a time well before Kepler. Tabby's Star could not possibly know that Kepler is spying on it these last few years. Therefore that hypothesis is proven invalid. Try again? (Y/N) __
.


Quantum super awareness duh. Spooky knowledge at a distance.


Nice try! Let's see now. Quantum entanglement is when you move an electron in one place, it's analog moves in another place way far away, thus defying speed of light and all that. So from single electrons we get to a space telescope looking at a star that is 1480 years way, and the star knows it? Now we have experimental data more or less proving the first. Do we have any experimental data proving the second? Or is this more of a drop of water from a rubber ducky in the bathtub kills a beautiful butterfly in China kind of thing?



So... you are claiming that the butterfly is somehow in cahoots with the star? Interesting.



posted on Oct, 5 2016 @ 12:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: AshFan

originally posted by: schuyler

originally posted by: AshFan

originally posted by: schuyler

originally posted by: AshFan
The prevailing scientific knowledge on this, is that the star is shy, and Keplar spying on it is making it bashful.


Tabby's Star is 1,480 light years from Earth, therefore the light we are seeing today left the star in approximately 536 AD, a time well before Kepler. Tabby's Star could not possibly know that Kepler is spying on it these last few years. Therefore that hypothesis is proven invalid. Try again? (Y/N) __
.


Quantum super awareness duh. Spooky knowledge at a distance.


Nice try! Let's see now. Quantum entanglement is when you move an electron in one place, it's analog moves in another place way far away, thus defying speed of light and all that. So from single electrons we get to a space telescope looking at a star that is 1480 years way, and the star knows it? Now we have experimental data more or less proving the first. Do we have any experimental data proving the second? Or is this more of a drop of water from a rubber ducky in the bathtub kills a beautiful butterfly in China kind of thing?



So... you are claiming that the butterfly is somehow in cahoots with the star? Interesting.


How you got there from what I said is what is interesting, but I'll go with it. Makes as much sense as these other theories.



new topics
 
22
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join