It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
originally posted by: billydebunker
originally posted by: Jake27
originally posted by: billydebunker
If flying saucers were not physical craft, they couldn't show up in photographs.
As someone else mentioned, holograms aren't physical and yet they'd show up just fine in a photo. You need to open your mind a little, you know? You're very closed minded and unnecessarily aggressive.
There could be non physical entities, from another dimension, or a parallel universe, or even this universe except made from dark matter. They may have the ability to appear solid, or even be able to manipulate reality and actually become solid.
SHOW ME a photo of a hologram flying saucer, please. Any old hologram flying saucer will do, thanks.
You're talking out of another part of your anatomy.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: billydebunker
Unless the stealth bomber is not a physical object? Lol.
The stealth bomber does show up on radar. Especially if it is within visual range.
No aircraft is entirely invisible to radar. The goal is to make detection and/or radar lock as hard as possible. Therefore, the detection range is small enough that there is not enough reaction time to deploy countermeasures that are effective.
www.f-117a.com...
You may want to review who brought stealth bombers up and in what context.
Except the stealth bomber is not "unidentified" And the subject seems to be about unidentified ones here.
Thank you for proving my point. You're most useful when you don't intend to be.
Except the stealth bomber is not "unidentified" And the subject seems to be about unidentified ones here.
originally posted by: Springer
The previously banned member with the attitude problem has been banned again and several childish posts by said childish vainglorious poster have been removed.
Please carry on with the discussion sans the ridiculous interruptions...
Thanks.
originally posted by: billydebunker
a reply to: Gianfar
Vallée interprets this high strangeness case as an intelligently manufactured illusion, simply because he sees it as purely irrational that real ETs would do such a thing. Vallée's fundamental flaw of assuming that non-human beings would behave as we do is quite astonishing and should be obvious to any intellectual thinker capable of double checking his own assumptions.
Great post, So well written and informative. Vallee fails as a scientist and a Ufologist. Why waste time talking about him, unless as a way to deliberately avoid meaningful discussion of the very real and physical alien abduction crisis.