It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Revisiting Jaques Vallée - Beyond the Control Loop

page: 13
37
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:29 PM
link   
a reply to: billydebunker

Just FYI,

This is a courtesy notice.

I only respond to posters who maintain even a minimal amount of decorum, and who aren't
so lost in their own personal world that they can't have intelligent discussions with others
and play somewhat nice with others.

Have a nice day.

Kev




posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 02:40 PM
link   
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Hello again Kev,

When you made the observation




.....some particularly unstable personalities go into attack mode and make jerks out of themselves to dismiss the notion--and never have any evidence to make a clear case.


You do realize that this could produce further unstable behaviour of the type you describe. I suspect your intentions are merely clearing the route to a hypothetical, self operating, noose for them to utilise upon themselves. Let's leave this one dangling a while for now though hey?



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 03:25 PM
link   
a reply to: mirageman

Works for me.

Kev



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 04:44 PM
link   
Childish indignation removed
edit on 10-9-2016 by Springer because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 04:48 PM
link   

edit on 10-9-2016 by Springer because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 05:01 PM
link   

edit on 10-9-2016 by Springer because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 05:23 PM
link   
a reply to: billydebunker




I guess the irony of calling the most accurate and informative posts in here "unstable" is lost on you.


Now that's ironic.




Ah well, must be that British lack of humor. Or is it spelled "humour" on your rainy little island?


Indeed it is spelled "humour" in the home of the English language as it is in many of our fellow Commonwealth nations. That's because we find including "U" just adds to the amusement .

And we Brits love our rainy little islands. Unlike others It's so wet here we could never hang ourselves out to dry.


(post by DJW001 removed for a manners violation)

posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 05:30 PM
link   
Double post.
edit on 8-10-2016 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 05:31 PM
link   
a thread about the man that got it right amazing!



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 05:52 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 05:53 PM
link   
always loved the Camper Killer Commentary on Jaques Vallee

edit on 8-10-2016 by brice because: adjust youtube code



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 05:56 PM
link   

edit on 10-9-2016 by Springer because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 05:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: humanoidlord
a thread about the man that got it right amazing!

Well, I guess you're right, this thread is about me.


(post by DJW001 removed for a manners violation)

posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 07:00 PM
link   
a reply to: billydebunker


Please don't inject qualifiers into my statements, dude.


Someone has to do it if the premise is to be valid. If a single visual sighting does not create a radar return, it proves that not all UFOs are physical. It does not work the other way around.


(post by billydebunker removed for a manners violation)

posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 07:43 PM
link   
a reply to: billydebunker



Unless the stealth bomber is not a physical object? Lol.

The stealth bomber does show up on radar. Especially if it is within visual range.

No aircraft is entirely invisible to radar. The goal is to make detection and/or radar lock as hard as possible. Therefore, the detection range is small enough that there is not enough reaction time to deploy countermeasures that are effective.

www.f-117a.com...



posted on Oct, 8 2016 @ 08:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: billydebunker

originally posted by: Jake27

originally posted by: billydebunker
If flying saucers were not physical craft, they couldn't show up in photographs.


As someone else mentioned, holograms aren't physical and yet they'd show up just fine in a photo. You need to open your mind a little, you know? You're very closed minded and unnecessarily aggressive.
There could be non physical entities, from another dimension, or a parallel universe, or even this universe except made from dark matter. They may have the ability to appear solid, or even be able to manipulate reality and actually become solid.



SHOW ME a photo of a hologram flying saucer, please. Any old hologram flying saucer will do, thanks.
You're talking out of another part of your anatomy.





(post by billydebunker removed for a manners violation)

new topics

top topics



 
37
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join